BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1379
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 4, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 1379 (Bradford) - As Amended:  March 14, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              PERS Vote:4-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes public retirement systems with assets over 
          $4 billion to report annually to the Controller on investments 
          in California and emerging domestic markets, as specified.  
          Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Permits a state or local public retirement system with assets 
            over $4 billion to report to the Controller on investments in 
            California and emerging domestic markets, as specified, that 
            it adds to its portfolio on and after July 1, 2012.

          2)Requires the Controller, by June 1, 2012, to develop 
            streamlined and cost-effective methods of identifying 
            investments within the retirement system's portfolios that 
            meet the definitions of California investment and emerging 
            domestic market investment.  These methods are to be updated 
            at least every five years and be made available through the 
            Controller's Internet Web site.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Costs to the Controller's office of approximately $500,000 to 
            establish the methods for pension systems to identify 
            investments that meet the criteria within the bill and for the 
            Controller to process the information and make it available on 
            their web site.  Costs will vary depending on the number of 
            pension systems that elect to participate.  Costs likely to 
            decline after initial reports and rise again when the 
            mandatory five-year updates are prepared.  

          2)The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) 
            estimates that if they chose to participate, the costs to 








                                                                  AB 1379
                                                                  Page  2

            comply with the requirements of the bill would be 
            approximately $350,000.

          3)Costs could be incurred by the California State Teachers 
            Retirement System to the extent that either choose to 
            participate and depending on how easily their current data 
            collection and reporting can be modified to meet the 
            Controller's criteria

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose.   According to the author, California communities 
            represent a potentially significant investment opportunity for 
            institutional investors generating appropriate risk-adjusted 
            returns.  The state, however, does not track investments made 
            by public pension funds and does not engage private investors 
            on how to make the state a more attractive place in which to 
            invest.  More private investment, in turn, could result in 
            increased financial opportunities for the state's historically 
            underserved capital markets, also known as emerging domestic 
            markets, which include ethnic- and women-owned firms, urban 
            and rural communities, companies which serve 
            low-to-moderate-income populations, and other small- and 
            medium sized businesses.
              
           2)CalPERS and CalSTRS  .  Both entities have special initiatives 
            on California investments and investments in emerging domestic 
            managers.  According to information provided by CalPERS, the 
            capital that CalPERS invests in California is usually not 
            explicitly directed to the state but is the consequence of a 
            process weighing the financial merits of particular companies, 
            properties and projects, regardless of location.  
                
            3)Applicable retirement systems.   According to the most recent 
            data on public pension systems (fiscal year 2007-2008) that 
            are compiled by the Controller's Office, 15 public pension 
            funds in the state have assets over $4 billion.  In addition 
            to CalPERS and STRS, there are two University of California 
            systems, and two in Los Angeles County.  Also included in the 
            bill's criteria would be three pension systems within the City 
            of Los Angeles, the City and County of San Francisco, and the 
            Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino, 
            Sacramento, Alameda, and Contra Costa.  There are four or five 
            other systems that could be affected, as their assets may have 
            grown since the 2007-2008 fiscal year.








                                                                  AB 1379
                                                                  Page  3


           4)Previous legislation  .  AB 2570(Arambula) of 2006 was vetoed by 
            Governor Schwarzenegger on the basis of administrative costs, 
            and contained, among its other provisions, language similar to 
            AB 1379.


           Analysis Prepared by :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081