BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1404|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1404
          Author:   Feuer (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/9/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM.  :  6-2, 7/3/12
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley, Rubio, 
            Simitian
          NOES:  Gaines, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/6/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Dutton

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not relevant


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  additional registration fee:  
          vehicle-theft crimes

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the Counties of Los 
          Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino to increase the fee 
          imposed upon registration of a vehicle to fund vehicle 
          theft programs from $1 to $2.  Upon approval of the 
          increase that applies to all vehicles, the amount imposed 
          upon commercial vehicles would increase from $2 to $4.

           ANALYSIS :    Existing law establishes a basic vehicle 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1404
                                                                Page 
          2

          registration fee of $46, plus a $23 surcharge for 
          additional personnel for the California Highway Patrol 
          (CHP) for the new or renewal registration of most vehicles. 
           Existing law also authorizes local agencies to impose 
          separate vehicle registration fee surcharges in their 
          respective jurisdictions for a variety of special programs, 
          including $1 for a program to deter, investigate, and 
          prosecute vehicle theft.  A county board of supervisors 
          must adopt a resolution to impose this $1 surcharge on 
          every new or renewal vehicle registration, plus another $2 
          on commercial vehicles, within the county.

          The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) collects the 
          surcharge and remits those fees, after deducting its own 
          administrative costs, to the State Controller.  State law 
          continuously appropriates these funds, which the State 
          Controller disburses to each participating county based on 
          the number of registered vehicles within that county.

          Each quarter a participating county must submit to CHP a 
          report on the expenditures and activity, and by August 31st 
          every year, each county must submit a report to the State 
          Controller that describes for the fiscal year that just 
          ended:

           Total revenues received from the surcharge by the county;
           Total expenditures by the county on eligible programs;
           A summary of vehicle theft abatement activities and other 
            programs funded by the surcharge;
           The total number of stolen vehicles recovered and their 
            value; 
           The total number of vehicles stolen and a comparison to 
            the preceding fiscal year; and
           Any unexpended surcharge revenues received.

          The Controller may suspend collection of the fee if the 
          local agency is not reporting as required in law or is not 
          expending funds as authorized.  The Controller annually 
          reports to the Legislature on this program.

          This bill:

          1.Authorizes Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino 
            Counties to increase the vehicle theft surcharge imposed 







                                                               AB 1404
                                                                Page 
          3

            on all vehicles subject to annual registration in their 
            respective jurisdictions from $1 to $2, upon adoption of 
            a resolution by the county board of supervisors. 

          2.Increases the $2 surcharge that is currently imposed on 
            commercial vehicles from $2 to $4 upon approval of the 
            resolution that increases the surcharge for all vehicles. 
             

          3.Requires the county board of supervisors to submit the 
            resolution to DMV at least six months prior to the 
            operative date of the fee increase.

           Background

           SB 2139 (Davis), Chapter 1670, Statutes of 1990, authorized 
          counties to impose a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations 
          to fund vehicle theft programs.  Since then, the cost of 
          these programs has far outpaced the increased number of 
          registered vehicles on the road.

          Forty-seven counties impose the surcharge, including Los 
          Angeles County, where, in 1993, the Board of Supervisors 
          imposed a $1 fee to create a vehicle theft program called 
          the Taskforce for Regional Auto-theft Prevention (TRAP).

          TRAP is a multi-agency task force that investigates, 
          prosecutes, and deters vehicle theft and fraud on a 
          coordinated and cooperative basis.  The author and sponsors 
          report that TRAP has been highly successful in combating 
          vehicle theft and fraud by focusing on organized vehicle 
          theft rings, "chop shops," international auto theft rings 
          that steal vehicles and ship them to other countries, 
          individuals who obtain vehicles by fraud, and other forms 
          of vehicle theft.

          Los Angeles County reports that since 1993, TRAP has made 
          approximately 9,300 arrests, recovered over 23,000 vehicles 
          worth nearly $400 million, and prosecuted over 4,000 cases 
          of automobile theft.  In recent years TRAP has had to 
          reduce the number of personnel assigned to the program due 
          to increases in operating, fuel, and equipment costs.  The 
          sponsor states that these reductions have negatively 
          impacted TRAP's ability to effectively combat auto theft in 







                                                               AB 1404
                                                                Page 
          4

          Los Angeles County and notes that in 2004 TRAP employed 71 
          personnel to combat auto theft at a cost of $7.3 million.  
          This year, TRAP employed only 29 people at a cost of $7.2 
          million.  As time goes on, in the not-so-distant future the 
          TRAP team will not have sufficient funding to do its job.  
          This bill would give Los Angeles County the authority to 
          double the funds it has for the TRAP program.

           Proposition 26  .  Proposition 26 requires that any "change 
          in statute which results in a taxpayer paying a higher tax 
          must be imposed by an act passed by not less than 
          two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses 
          of the Legislature."  This bill does not result in a 
          taxpayer paying a higher tax but delegates to the Los 
          Angeles County Board of Supervisors the authority to impose 
          a higher surcharge on vehicle registrations to fund a 
          specific government function.  Ultimately, the Los Angeles 
          County Counsel would have to determine a vote threshold at 
          the county level.  So while this bill is a majority vote 
          measure in the Legislature, the local action to increase 
          the registration surcharge may be a two-thirds vote of the 
          electorate in a county.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           All administrative costs to the Department of Motor 
            Vehicles and the State Controller's Office are fully 
            recovered from fee revenues collected.

           Potential revenue gains of approximately $7.2 million for 
            Los Angeles County, $2.5 million for San Diego County, 
            and $1.6 million for San Bernardino County if increases 
            to vehicle surcharges are approved.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/9/12)

          Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (source) 
          Association of Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
          Burbank Police Department
          Chula Vista Police Department
          Greater Los Angeles New Car Dealers Association







                                                               AB 1404
                                                                Page 
          5

          Los Angeles District Attorney's Office
          Los Angeles Police Chiefs Association
          Los Angeles Police Protective League
          Monrovia Police Department
          Redlands Police Department
          San Bernardino County Sheriff
          San Bernardino District Attorney's Office
          San Diego District Attorney's Office

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/9/12)

          CalTax
          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association


          JJA:n  8/9/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****