BILL NUMBER: AB 1411	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 28, 2011

INTRODUCED BY    Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and
the Economy   (   V. Manuel Pérez
(Chair), Beall, Block, and Hueso   )  
Assembly Member   V. Manuel Pérez 
    (   Principal coauthor:   Senator 
 DeSaulnier   ) 

                        MARCH 10, 2011

    An act to amend Sections 7076.1 and 7085.1 of, and to
repeal Section 7085 of, the Government Code, relating to economic
development.   An act to amend Sections 7071, 7072,
7073.1, 7076, 7076.1, 7081, 7085, 7085.1, and 7085.5 of the
Government Code, relating to economic development. 


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1411, as amended,  Committee on Jobs, Economic
Development, and the Economy   V. Manuel Pérez  .
Economic development:  omnibus bill.  
enterprise zones.  
   The Enterprise Zone Act provides for the designation and oversight
by the Department of Housing and Community Development of various
types of economic development areas throughout the state, including
enterprise zones, targeted tax areas, local agency military base
recovery areas (LAMBRAs), and Manufacturing Enhancement Areas,
collectively known as geographically targeted economic development
areas, or G-TEDAs. Pursuant to these provisions, qualifying entities
in those areas may receive certain tax and regulatory incentives.
 
   This bill would revise various definitions for purposes of the act
and modify specified requirements for designating and administering
enterprise zones, LAMBRAs, and G-TEDAs collectively. The bill would
impose new requirements on the Department of Housing and Community
Development with respect to the enterprise zone program and modify
department and Franchise Tax Board reporting requirements. 

   (1) Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community
Development to submit a report to the Legislature every 5 years
evaluating specified effects of enterprise zones.  
   This bill would repeal, recast, and make various changes to these
provisions.  
   (2) Existing law requires a geographically targeted economic
development area (G-TEDA) to report to the Department of Housing and
Community Development every 2 years on progress made toward its
existing goals and objectives and plans for the following 2-year
period. Existing law also requires that a copy of this biennial
report be submitted to the legislative bodies of the local
jurisdictions comprising the G-TEDA for review.  
   This bill would delete the requirement that this report be
submitted to the legislative bodies of the local jurisdictions
comprising the G-TEDA. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    Section 7071 of the  
Government Code   is amended to read: 
   7071.  The Legislature finds and declares as follows:
   (a) The health, safety, and welfare of the people of California
depend upon the development, stability, and expansion of private
business, industry, and commerce, and there are certain areas within
the state that are economically depressed due to a lack of investment
in the private sector. Therefore, it is declared to be the purpose
of this chapter to  help stabilize local communities, alleviate
poverty, and enhance the state's economic prosperity through the
implementation of public and privately funded programs and services
that  stimulate business and industrial growth in the depressed
areas of the state  by relaxing regulatory controls that
impede private investment  . 
   (b) The geographically targeted economic development area (G-TEDA)
programs are based on the economic principle that targeting
significant incentives to lower income communities allows these
communities to more effectively compete for new businesses and retain
existing businesses, which results in increased tax revenues, less
reliance on social services, and lower public safety costs. Residents
and businesses also directly benefit from these more sustainable
economic conditions through improved neighborhoods, business
expansion, and job creation.  
   (b) It 
    (c)     Therefore, it  is in the
economic interest of the state to have one strong, combined, and
 business-friendly   business- and community
development-friendly  incentive program to help attract business
and industry to the state, to help retain and expand existing state
business and industry, and to create increased job opportunities for
all Californians. 
   (c) No enterprise zone shall be designated in which any boundary
thereof is drawn in a manner so as to include larger stable
businesses or heavily residential areas to the detriment of areas
that are truly economically depressed. 
   (d)  Nothing in this   This  chapter
shall  not  be construed to infringe upon regulations
relating to the civil rights, equal employment rights, equal
opportunity rights, or fair housing rights of any person.
   SEC. 2.    Section 7072 of the   Government
Code   is amended to read: 
   7072.  For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions
shall apply:
   (a) "Department" means the Department of Housing and Community
Development.
   (b) "Date of original designation" means the earlier of the
following:
   (1) The date the eligible area receives designation as an
enterprise zone by the department pursuant to this chapter.
   (2) In the case of an enterprise zone deemed designated pursuant
to subdivision (e) of Section 7073, the date the enterprise zone or
program area received original designation by the former Trade and
Commerce Agency pursuant to Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section
7070) or Chapter 12.9 (commencing with Section 7080), as those
chapters read prior to January 1, 1997.
   (c) "Eligible area" means any of the following:
   (1)  (A)    An area designated as an enterprise
zone pursuant to Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 7070), as it
read prior to January 1, 1997, or as a targeted economic development
area, neighborhood development area, or program area pursuant to
Chapter 12.9 (commencing with Section 7080), as it read prior to
January 1, 1997. 
   (2) A geographic area that, based upon the determination of the
department, fulfills at least one of the following criteria:
 
   (A) The proposed geographic area meets the Urban Development
Action Grant criteria of the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development.  
   (B) The area within the proposed eligible area has experienced
plant closures within the past two years affecting more than 100
workers.  
   (C) The city or county has submitted material to the department
for a finding that the proposed geographic area meets criteria of
economic distress related to those used in determining eligibility
under the Urban Development Action Grant Program and is therefore an
eligible area.  
   (D) The area within the proposed zone has a history of
gang-related activity, whether or not crimes of violence have been
committed.  
   (3) A geographic area that meets at least two of the following
criteria:  
   (B) A geographic area within census tracts of the proposed
eligible area with a median household income for a family of four
that does not exceed 80 percent of the statewide median income for
the most recently available calendar year, as well as meeting at
least one of the following criteria:  
   (A) 
    (i)  The census tracts within the proposed eligible area
have an unemployment rate not less than 3 percentage points above
the statewide average for the most recent calendar year as determined
by the Employment Development Department. 
   (B) 
   (ii)  The  county of   census tracts
for  the proposed eligible area  has  are
served by public schools that have  more than 70 percent of the
children enrolled in  public school participating in
 the federal free lunch program. 
   (C) The median household income for a family of four within the
census tracts of the proposed eligible area does not exceed 80
percent of the statewide median income for the most recently
available calendar year.  
   (iii) The area within the proposed zone has experienced
significant distress factors, as defined by the department,
including, but not limited to, a history of significant gang-related
activity, high crime rates, or a significant number of plant or
business closures, or all of these.  
   (2) The amendments made to this subdivision during the 2011
portion of the 2011-12 Regular Session shall apply only to requests
for proposals issued on or after January 1, 2012. 
   (d) "Enterprise zone" means any area within a city, county, or
city and county that is designated as an enterprise zone by the
department in accordance with  Section  
Sections  7073  and 7073.3 that include an eligible area and
a qualifying commercial or industrial area, or both, as defined by
the department  .
   (e) "Governing body" means a county board of supervisors or a city
council, as appropriate.
   (f) "G-TEDA" means a geographically targeted economic development
area, which is an area designated as an enterprise zone  , a
Manufacturing Enhancement Area  ,  a targeted tax
area, or a local agency military base recovery area.
   (g) "High-technology industries" includes, but is not limited to,
the computer, biological engineering, electronics, and
telecommunications industries.
   (h) "Resident," unless otherwise defined, means a person whose
principal place of residence is within a targeted employment area.
   (i) (1) "Targeted employment area" means an area within a city,
county, or city and county that is composed solely of those census
tracts designated by the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development as having at least 51 percent of its residents of
low- or moderate-income levels, using either the most recent United
States  Department of  Census  Bureau  data
available at the time of the original enterprise zone application or
the most recent census data available at the time the targeted
employment area is designated to determine that eligibility. The
purpose of a "targeted employment area" is to encourage businesses in
an enterprise zone to hire eligible residents of certain geographic
areas within a city, county, or city and county. A targeted
employment area may be, but is not required to be, the same as all or
part of an enterprise zone. A targeted employment area's boundaries
need not be contiguous. A targeted employment area does not need to
encompass each eligible census tract within a city, county, or city
and county. The governing body of each city, county, or city and
county that has jurisdiction of the enterprise zone shall identify
those census tracts whose residents are in the most need of this
employment targeting. Only those census tracts within the
jurisdiction of the city, county, or city and county that has
jurisdiction of the enterprise zone may be included in a targeted
employment area.
   (2) At least a part of each eligible census tract within a
targeted employment area shall be within the territorial jurisdiction
of the city, county, or city and county that has jurisdiction for an
enterprise zone. If an eligible census tract encompasses the
territorial jurisdiction of two or more local governmental entities,
all of those entities shall be a party to the designation of a
targeted employment area. However, any one or more of those entities,
by resolution or ordinance, may specify that it shall not
participate in the application as an applicant, but shall agree to
complete all actions stated within the application that apply to its
jurisdiction, if the area is designated.
   (3) Each local governmental entity of each city, county, or city
and county that has jurisdiction of an enterprise zone shall approve,
by resolution or ordinance, the boundaries of its targeted
employment area, regardless of whether a census tract within the
proposed targeted employment area is outside the jurisdiction of the
local governmental entity.
   (4) (A) Within 180 days of updated United States census data
becoming available, each local governmental entity of each city,
county, or city and county that has jurisdiction of an enterprise
zone shall approve, by resolution or ordinance, boundaries of its
targeted employment area reflecting the new census data. If no
changes are necessary to the boundaries based on the most current
census data, the enterprise zone may send a letter to the department
stating that a review has been undertaken by the respective local
governmental entities and no boundary changes are required.
   (B) A targeted employment area boundary approved prior to the 2000
United States census data becoming available that has not been
reviewed and its boundaries revised to reflect the most recent census
data, shall be reviewed and updated, and a new resolution or
ordinance submitted by the appropriate local governmental entity to
the department, by July 1, 2007. However, enterprise zones that
expire on or prior to December 31, 2008, shall be exempt from the
update requirement.
   SEC. 3.    Section 7073.1 of the  
Government Code   is amended to read: 
   7073.1.  (a) Except as provided in subdivision  (e)
  (e)  , any city, county, or city and county with
an eligible area within its jurisdiction may complete a preliminary
application for designation as an enterprise zone. The applying
entity shall establish definitive boundaries for the proposed
enterprise zone and the targeted employment area. An entity may
propose zones in areas with noncontiguous boundaries, and the
department may designate those areas as zones if the director
determines both of the following:
   (1) The noncontiguous area is needed to implement the applicant's
economic development strategy.
   (2) The excluded area between the proposed zone boundaries would
not, based on the proposed economic strategy, also benefit from the
zone designation.
   (b) (1) In designating enterprise zones, the department shall
select from the applications submitted those proposed enterprise
zones that, upon a comparison of all of the applications submitted,
indicate that they propose the most appropriate economic development
strategy and implementation plan utilizing state and local programs
and incentives to create jobs, attract private sector investment, and
improve the economic conditions within the zone proposed. The
department shall prescribe a format that promotes succinct and
focused strategies and plans, and set minimum standards for the
strategies and plans. For the purposes of this subdivision, important
elements of a strategy or plan may include, but are not limited to,
all of the following:
   (A) An assessment of current financial and community development
strengths, needs, and opportunities.
   (B) A framework for investment of time, action, and money.
   (C) Clear articulation of goals.
   (D) Measurable objectives, including targets.
   (E) Proposed implementation activities and tasks, including
timeframes, and a framework for evaluating performance, including
qualitative and quantitative benchmarks. 
   (F) An identification of local resources, including incentives,
the jurisdiction will utilize to implement the strategy or plan and
how those resources will help to leverage or maximize the benefit of
state resources that become available for enterprise zone
communities. 
   (2) For purposes of this subdivision, local  incentives
  resources  may include, but are not limited to,
all of the following:
   (A) The suspension or relaxation of locally originated or modified
building codes, zoning laws, general development plans, or rent
controls.
   (B) The elimination or reduction of fees for applications,
permits, and local government services.
   (C) The establishment of a streamlined permit process.
   (D) Elimination or reduction of construction taxes or business
license taxes.
   (E) The provision or expansion of infrastructure.
   (F) The targeting of federal block grant moneys, including small
cities, education, and health and welfare block grants.
   (G) The targeting of economic development grants and loan moneys,
including grant and loan moneys provided by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   (H) The targeting of state and federal job disadvantaged and
vocational education grant moneys, including moneys provided by the
federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-220), or its
successor.
   (I) The targeting of federal or state transportation grant moneys.

   (J) The targeting of federal or state low-income housing and
rental assistance moneys.
   (K) The use of tax allocation bonds, special assessment bonds,
bonds under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Chapter
2.5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title
5), industrial development bonds, revenue bonds, private activity
bonds, housing bonds, bonds issued pursuant to the Marks-Roos Local
Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of
Chapter 5), certificates of participation, hospital bonds,
redevelopment bonds, school bonds, and all special provisions
provided for under federal tax law for enterprise community or
empowerment zone bonds. 
   (L) Redevelopment tax increment moneys and local financing
authorities.  
   (M) Federal Workforce Investment Act moneys and programs funded
with those moneys.  
   (N) Federal Community Development Block Grant Program moneys.
 
   (O) CalWORKs funding and other related resources.  
   (P) Local education entities, including K-12, adult education,
community colleges, and public and private universities. 
   (3) When designating new enterprise zones, the department shall
take into consideration the location of existing zones and make every
effort to locate new zones in a manner that will not adversely
affect any existing zones.
   (4) When reviewing and ranking new enterprise zone applications,
the department shall give bonus points to applications from
jurisdictions that meet minimum threshold points and at least
 two   both  of the following criteria:
   (A) The percentage of households within the census tracts of the
proposed enterprise zone area, the income of which is below the
poverty level, is at least 17.5 percent.
   (B) The average unemployment rate for the census tracts of the
proposed enterprise zone area was not less than five percentage
points above the statewide average for the most recent calendar year
as determined by the Employment Development Department. 
   (C) The applicant jurisdiction has, and can document that it has,
a unique distress factor affecting long-term economic development,
including, but not limited to, resource depletion, plant closure,
industry recession, natural disaster, or military base closure.

   (5) Except as modified pursuant to paragraph (4), applications
shall be ranked by the appropriateness of the economic development
strategy and implementation plan, including all of the following:
   (A) The extent the strategy clearly identifies the local
resources, incentives, and programs that will be made available to
the zone for meeting its goals and objectives.
   (B) The extent the strategy provides for attracting private sector
investment.
   (C) The extent the strategy includes related regional and
community-based partnerships for achieving the goals and objectives
in the strategy.
   (D) The extent the strategy fits within the jurisdiction's overall
economic development strategy, including the extent the strategy and
implementation plan is appropriate for the local community.
   (E) The extent the strategy addresses the hiring and retention of
unemployed or underemployed residents or low-income individuals in
the proposed zone and surrounding areas.
   (F) The extent the strategy sets reasonable and measurable
benchmarks, goals, and objectives.
   (G) The extent the strategy sets forth an appropriate funding
schedule for management, oversight, and program delivery within the
zone relative to the benchmarks, goals, and objectives in the
strategy.
   (H) The extent that the economic development strategy has a
comprehensive incentive package for attracting private investment to
the enterprise zone.
   (c)  In evaluating applications for designation, the department
shall ensure that applications are not disqualified solely because of
technical deficiencies, and shall provide applicants with an
opportunity to correct the deficiencies. Applications shall be
disqualified if the deficiencies are not corrected within two weeks.
   (d)  Except upon dedesignation pursuant to subdivision (c) of
Section 7076.1, Section 7076.2, or Section 7085.1, a designation made
by the department shall be binding for a period of 15 years from the
date of the original designation.
   (e)     The applicant shall be required to
begin implementation of the enterprise zone plan contained in the
final application within six months after notification of final
designation, or the enterprise zone shall be dedesignated. 

   (e) 
    (f)     (1)  This section shall
 only  apply  only  to enterprise zone
applications for which the department has issued a solicitation for
new enterprise zone designations on or after January 1, 2007. 
   (2) The amendments made to this section during the 2011 portion of
the 2011-12 Regular Session shall apply only to enterprise zone
applications for which the department has issued a solicitation for
new enterprise zone designations on or after January 1, 2012. 
   SEC. 4.    Section 7076 of the   Government
Code   is amended to read: 
   7076.   (a)     The department shall serve
as a liaison between the state and enterprise zone residents,
businesses, workers, nonprofit organizations, and local governments.
State agencies and departments shall affirmatively support their
statutory responsibilities under this chapter and, consistent with
their statutory duties, respond to requests made by and on the behalf
of an enterprise zone.  
   (a) 
    (b)  (1) The department shall provide technical
assistance to the enterprise zones designated pursuant to this
chapter with respect to all of the following activities:
   (A) Furnish limited onsite assistance to the enterprise zones when
appropriate.
   (B) Ensure that the locality has developed a method to make
residents, businesses, and neighborhood organizations aware of the
opportunities to participate in the program.
   (C) Help the locality develop a marketing program for the
enterprise zone.
   (D) Coordinate activities of other state agencies regarding the
enterprise zones.
   (E) Monitor the progress of the program.
   (F) Help businesses to participate in the program.
   (2) Notwithstanding existing law, the provision of services in
subparagraphs (A) to (F), inclusive, shall be a high priority of the
department.
   (3) The department may, at its discretion, undertake other
activities in providing management and technical assistance for
successful implementation of this chapter. 
   (b) The applicant shall be required to begin implementation of the
enterprise zone plan contained in the final application within six
months after notification of final designation or the enterprise zone
shall lose its designation. 
   (c) The department shall assess a fee of fifteen dollars ($15) on
each enterprise zone and manufacturing enhancement area for each
application for issuance of a certificate pursuant to subdivision (j)
of Section 17053.47 of, subdivision (c) of Section 17053.74 of,
subdivision (c) of Section 23622.7 of, or subdivision (i) of Section
23622.8 of, the Revenue and Taxation Code. The department shall
collect the fee for deposit into the Enterprise Zone Fund, pursuant
to Section 7072.3, for the costs of administering this chapter. The
enterprise zone  or manufacturing enhancement area 
administrator shall collect this fee at the time an application is
submitted for issuance of a certificate. 
   (d) Certificates for hiring credits shall be processed and
approved or denied based upon the regulations and administrative
memoranda in effect as of the date of the application.
Clarifications, interpretations, and other items contained within a
memorandum shall be binding upon the department, businesses,
enterprise zones, and all other applicable entities, as consistent
with state and federal law, unless the memorandum is modified or
repealed in writing.  
   (e) (1) (A) The department shall maintain, and post on its
Internet Web site, a catalog of all administrative memoranda in
effect that implement this chapter, including the subject matter of
the memoranda and the effective dates of their publication,
modification, or repeal, along with the text of the memoranda. 

   (B) The department shall post on its Internet Web site the
publication, modification, or repeal of any of those administrative
memoranda, within 10 business days of that publication, modification,
or repeal.  
   (2) The department shall post on its Internet Web site enterprise
zone and targeted employment area boundary approvals, modifications,
and repeals within 10 business days of the approval, modification, or
repeal becoming final. 
   SEC. 5.    Section 7076.1 of the  
Government Code   is amended to read: 
   7076.1.  (a) The department may audit the program of any
jurisdiction in any designated G-TEDA at any time during the duration
of the designation, as appropriate. However, the department shall
audit each G-TEDA at least once every five years from the date of
designation or the operative date of this section, whichever is the
latest. The matters to be examined in the course of an audit shall
include an examination of the progress made by the G-TEDA toward
meeting the goals, objectives, and commitments set forth in its
original application and the department's memorandum of understanding
with the G-TEDA.
   (b) The department shall, for each audit, determine a result of
superior, pass, or fail in accordance with subdivision (c). The
results of each audit shall be based upon the success of the G-TEDA
in making substantial and sustained efforts since the later of its
designation or last audit to meet the standards, criteria, and
conditions contained in the application and the memorandum of
understanding (MOU) between the department and the G-TEDA, as may be
amended pursuant to the agreement of the G-TEDA and the department.
In each audit, the department shall focus upon the G-TEDA's use of
the marketing plan, local incentives, financing programs, job
development, and program management as described in the application
and the MOU. The department shall also evaluate the vouchering plan,
staffing levels, budget, and elements unique to each application.
   (c) For purposes of subdivision (b), an audit determination of
superior, pass, or fail shall be made in accordance with the
following:
   (1) A G-TEDA will be determined to be superior if each
jurisdiction comprising the G-TEDA does all of the following:
   (A) Meets  90 to  100 percent of its goals, objectives,
and commitments as defined in its application, most recent audit,
biennial report, and memorandum of understanding with the department,
and as determined by the department in consultation with the G-TEDA.
An equivalent or similar commitment may be substituted for an
existing commitment of a G-TEDA if it is determined by the department
that an original commitment was not realistically practical or is no
longer relevant.
   (B) Demonstrates that it has reviewed and updated its goals,
objectives, and commitments as defined in its original application,
most recent audit, biennial report, and memorandum of understanding
with the department.
   (C) Identifies to the department's satisfaction that it has
incorporated economic development commitments in addition to those
commitments previously made in its application.
   (2) (A) A G-TEDA will be determined to be passing if each
jurisdiction comprising the area meets  or exceeds 
75  to 90  percent of its goals, objectives, or commitments
as defined in its original application, most recent audit, biennial
report, and memorandum of understanding with the department, and as
determined by the department in consultation with the G-TEDA. An
equivalent or similar commitment may be substituted for an existing
commitment of a G-TEDA if it is determined by the department that an
original commitment was not realistically practical or is no longer
relevant.
   (B) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be passing may appeal in
writing to the department for a determination of superior. Only one
appeal                                             may be filed
pursuant to this subparagraph with respect to a determination by the
department, and may be filed no later than 30 days after the G-TEDA's
receipt of the determination to which the appeal pertains. The
department shall respond in writing to any appeal that is properly
filed pursuant to this subparagraph within 60 days of the date of
that filing.
   (3) (A) A G-TEDA will be determined to be failing if any
jurisdiction comprising the G-TEDA fails to meet or exceed 75 percent
of its goals, objectives, or commitments as defined in its original
application, most recent audit, biennial report, and memorandum of
understanding with the department, and as determined by the
department in consultation with the G-TEDA. An equivalent or similar
commitment may be substituted for an existing commitment of a G-TEDA
if it is determined by the department that an original commitment was
not realistically practical or is no longer relevant.
   (B) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be failing shall enter into a
written agreement with the department that specifies those items
that the G-TEDA is required to remedy or improve. Failure of the
G-TEDA and the department to negotiate and enter into a written
agreement as so described within 60 days of the last day upon which
the department is required to deliver a response letter pursuant to
subparagraph (C)  of paragraph (4)  shall result in the
dedesignation of the G-TEDA on January 1 immediately following the
department's written notice of dedesignation to the G-TEDA. 
A 
    (C)     A  written agreement entered
into pursuant to this  subparagraph   paragraph
 shall be for a six-month period. If, upon the expiration of the
agreement, the department determines that the G-TEDA has not met or
implemented at least 75 percent of the conditions set forth in the
agreement, the department shall, after immediately providing written
notification to each jurisdiction comprising the G-TEDA that the
G-TEDA is to be dedesignated  , dedesignate   .
Dedesignation of  the G-TEDA  is  effective on the
first day of the month next following the date upon which the
agreement expired. If, upon expiration of the agreement, the
department determines that the G-TEDA has met or implemented at least
75 percent of the conditions set forth in the agreement, the
department shall do either of the following:
   (i) Allow the G-TEDA an additional year, or a longer period in the
department's discretion, to meet or implement those conditions in
their entirety.
   (ii) Pursuant to written notice provided immediately to each
jurisdiction that comprises the G-TEDA that the G-TEDA is to be
dedesignated, dedesignate the G-TEDA effective on January 1
immediately following the date of the department's written
notification of dedesignation to those jurisdictions. 
   Any 
    (D)     Any  business, located within
any jurisdiction that comprises a G-TEDA that has been dedesignated,
that has elected to avail itself of any state tax incentive
specifically applicable to a G-TEDA for any taxable or income year
beginning prior to the dedesignation of the G-TEDA may, to the extent
the business is otherwise still eligible for those incentives,
continue to avail itself of those incentives for a period equal to
the remaining life of the G-TEDA. However, any business, located
within any jurisdiction that comprises a G-TEDA that has been
dedesignated, that has not availed itself of any state tax incentive
in the manner described in the preceding sentence may not, after
dedesignation of the G-TEDA, avail itself of any state incentive
specifically applicable to a G-TEDA.
   (4) (A) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, a G-TEDA
shall be determined to be failing if any jurisdiction comprising the
G-TEDA, in the determination of the director, provides funding
support in at least three of the previous five years at a level that
is less than 75 percent of the amount committed to in the G-TEDA's
memorandum of understanding with the department.
   (B) In the event that a G-TEDA is determined to be failing
pursuant to this paragraph, subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) shall
apply.
   (C) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be failing pursuant to this
paragraph may appeal in writing to the department. The appeal shall
be filed within 30 days of the G-TEDA's receipt of the determination
to which the appeal pertains. The department shall respond in writing
to any appeal that is properly filed within 60 days of the date of
filing. 
   (d) In undertaking its audit responsibilities pursuant to this
section, the department shall seek appropriate opportunities to
provide technical assistance and training to help G-TEDAs address
inadequacies identified through the audit of the program. Assistance
may include, but is not limited to, workshops, mentoring programs,
and referrals to other federal, state, and local public and private
entities.  
   (d) 
    (e)  (1) For purposes of this section, "dedesignation"
means that a G-TEDA is no longer a G-TEDA for purposes of either
Section 7073 or 7085.
   (2) Upon notification by the department of the dedesignation of a
G-TEDA and the end of the appeal period with respect to that
dedesignation, the department shall initiate an application process
for a new designation as provided in Section 7073, 7073.8, 7085,
7097, or 7114. 
   (f) In addition to any other oversight activities that the
department determines are appropriate and necessary, the department
shall review the progress reports submitted by a G-TEDA pursuant to
Section 7085.1 and determine whether an audit is warranted. 
   SEC. 6.    Section 7081 of the  Government
Code   is amended to read: 
   7081.   (a)    Notwithstanding any other
provision of state law, and to the extent permitted by federal law,
the Employment Development Department and the State Department of
Education shall give high priority to the training of unemployed
individuals who reside in a targeted employment area or a designated
enterprise zone.  The  
   (b) When developing workforce development and training plans and
strategies, including, but not limited to, federal Workforce
Development Act funds, a state entity shall consider how the G-TEDA
programs could be integrated so as to maximize the benefits to
workers and businesses.  
   (c) The Employment Development Department shall, consistent with
its duties to assist unemployed workers who are registered in the
one-stop career centers, provide letters to unemployed prospective
employees that could be used to certify their eligibility as a person
participating in a program developed pursuant to the federal
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 2081 et seq.). 

    (d)     The  department may assist
localities in designating local business, labor, and education
consortia to broker activities between the employment community and
educational and training institutions. Any available discretionary
funds may be used to assist the creation of those consortia. 
   (e) Local education entities that administer student work permits
shall consider how enterprise zone program hiring credits could be
used to benefit lower income students who apply for work permits at
their offices. 
   SEC. 7.    Section 7085 of the   Government
Code   is amended to read: 
   7085.  (a) Notwithstanding Section 7550.5, the department shall
submit a report to the Legislature every  five  
six  years  beginning January 1, 1998,  that
evaluates the effect of the program on  retaining and increasing
 employment  among targeted populations as described in
subdivision (c)  ,  public and   private 
investment, and incomes, and on state and local tax revenues in
designated enterprise zones. The report shall include a department
review of the progress and effectiveness of each enterprise zone,
including, but not limited to, any efforts made regarding training
 and placement  of unemployed individuals pursuant to
Section 7081. The Employment Development Department  , the State
Department of Social Services, and the State Department of Education
 shall, for the purposes of the report, provide the department
with existing data on unemployed individuals receiving training. The
Franchise Tax Board shall make available to the department and the
Legislature aggregate information on the dollar value of enterprise
zone tax credits that are claimed each year by businesses 
pursuant to Section 7085.5. The Department of General Services shall
provide information on the use and outcomes that the department
tracks relating to the enterprise zone procurement preference  .

   (b) An enterprise zone governing body shall provide information at
the request of the department as necessary for the department to
prepare the report required pursuant to subdivision (a). 
   (c) Targeted populations included within the report required
pursuant to subdivision (a) shall include, but not be limited to, the
disabled, disabled veterans, individuals formerly on forms of
federal and state assistance, individuals within the targeted
employment areas, ex-offenders, and veterans.  
   (d) The base year for the report required pursuant to subdivision
(a) shall be the calendar year commencing January 1, 2012. 

  SECTION 1.    The Legislature finds and declares
that this act by the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic
Development, and the Economy is the committee's annual omnibus bill
on geographically targeted economic development areas. 

  SEC. 2.    Section 7076.1 of the Government Code
is amended to read:
   7076.1.  (a) The department may audit the program of any
jurisdiction in any designated G-TEDA at any time during the duration
of the designation, as appropriate. However, the department shall
audit each G-TEDA at least once every five years from the date of
designation or the operative date of this section, whichever is the
latest. The matters to be examined in the course of an audit shall
include an examination of the progress made by the G-TEDA toward
meeting the goals, objectives, and commitments set forth in its
original application and the department's memorandum of understanding
with the G-TEDA.
   (b) The department shall, for each audit, determine a result of
superior, pass, or fail in accordance with subdivision (c). The
results of each audit shall be based upon the success of the G-TEDA
in making substantial and sustained efforts since the later of its
designation or last audit to meet the standards, criteria, and
conditions contained in the application and the memorandum of
understanding (MOU) between the department and the G-TEDA, as may be
amended pursuant to the agreement of the G-TEDA and the department.
In each audit, the department shall focus upon the G-TEDA's use of
the marketing plan, local incentives, financing programs, job
development, and program management as described in the application
and the MOU. The department shall also evaluate the vouchering plan,
staffing levels, budget, and elements unique to each application.
   (c) For purposes of subdivision (b), an audit determination of
superior, pass, or fail shall be made in accordance with the
following:
   (1) A G-TEDA will be determined to be superior if each
jurisdiction comprising the G-TEDA does all of the following:
   (A) Meets 100 percent of its goals, objectives, and commitments as
defined in its application, most recent audit, biennial report, and
memorandum of understanding with the department, and as determined by
the department in consultation with the G-TEDA. An equivalent or
similar commitment may be substituted for an existing commitment of a
G-TEDA if it is determined by the department that an original
commitment was not realistically practical or is no longer relevant.
   (B) Demonstrates that it has reviewed and updated its goals,
objectives, and commitments as defined in its original application,
most recent audit, biennial report, and memorandum of understanding
with the department.
   (C) Identifies to the department's satisfaction that it has
incorporated economic development commitments in addition to those
commitments previously made in its application.
   (2) (A) A G-TEDA will be determined to be passing if each
jurisdiction comprising the area meets or exceeds 75 percent of its
goals, objectives, or commitments as defined in its original
application, most recent audit, biennial report, and memorandum of
understanding with the department, and as determined by the
department in consultation with the G-TEDA. An equivalent or similar
commitment may be substituted for an existing commitment of a G-TEDA
if it is determined by the department that an original commitment was
not realistically practical or is no longer relevant.
   (B) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be passing may appeal in
writing to the department for a determination of superior. Only one
appeal may be filed pursuant to this subparagraph with respect to a
determination by the department, and may be filed no later than 30
days after the G-TEDA's receipt of the determination to which the
appeal pertains. The department shall respond in writing to any
appeal that is properly filed pursuant to this subparagraph within 60
days of the date of that filing.
   (3) (A) A G-TEDA will be determined to be failing if any
jurisdiction comprising the G-TEDA fails to meet or exceed 75 percent
of its goals, objectives, or commitments as defined in its original
application, most recent audit, biennial report, and memorandum of
understanding with the department, and as determined by the
department in consultation with the G-TEDA. An equivalent or similar
commitment may be substituted for an existing commitment of a G-TEDA
if it is determined by the department that an original commitment was
not realistically practical or is no longer relevant.
   (B) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be failing shall enter into a
written agreement with the department that specifies those items
that the G-TEDA is required to remedy or improve. Failure of the
G-TEDA and the department to negotiate and enter into a written
agreement as so described within 60 days of the last day upon which
the department is required to deliver a response letter pursuant to
subparagraph (C) shall result in the dedesignation of the G-TEDA on
January 1 immediately following the department's written notice of
dedesignation to the G-TEDA. A written agreement entered into
pursuant to this subparagraph shall be for a six-month period. If,
upon the expiration of the agreement, the department determines that
the G-TEDA has not met or implemented at least 75 percent of the
conditions set forth in the agreement, the department shall, after
immediately providing written notification to each jurisdiction
comprising the G-TEDA that the G-TEDA is to be dedesignated,
dedesignate the G-TEDA effective on the first day of the month next
following the date upon which the agreement expired. If, upon
expiration of the agreement, the department determines that the
G-TEDA has met or implemented at least 75 percent of the conditions
set forth in the agreement, the department shall do either of the
following:
   (i) Allow the G-TEDA an additional year, or a longer period in the
department's discretion, to meet or implement those conditions in
their entirety.
   (ii) Pursuant to written notice provided immediately to each
jurisdiction that comprises the G-TEDA that the G-TEDA is to be
dedesignated, dedesignate the G-TEDA effective on January 1
immediately following the date of the department's written
notification of dedesignation to those jurisdictions.
   Any business, located within any jurisdiction that comprises a
G-TEDA that has been dedesignated, that has elected to avail itself
of any state tax incentive specifically applicable to a G-TEDA for
any taxable or income year beginning prior to the dedesignation of
the G-TEDA may, to the extent the business is otherwise still
eligible for those incentives, continue to avail itself of those
incentives for a period equal to the remaining life of the G-TEDA.
However, any business, located within any jurisdiction that comprises
a G-TEDA that has been dedesignated, that has not availed itself of
any state tax incentive in the manner described in the preceding
sentence may not, after dedesignation of the G-TEDA, avail itself of
any state incentive specifically applicable to a G-TEDA.
   (4) (A)  Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, a
G-TEDA shall be determined to be failing if any jurisdiction
comprising the G-TEDA, in the determination of the director, provides
funding support in at least three of the previous five years at a
level that is less than 75 percent of the amount committed to in the
G-TEDA's memorandum of understanding with the department.
   (B) In the event that a G-TEDA is determined to be failing
pursuant to this paragraph, subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) shall
apply.
   (C) Any G-TEDA that is determined to be failing pursuant to this
paragraph may appeal in writing to the department. The appeal shall
be filed within 30 days of the G-TEDA's receipt of the determination
to which the appeal pertains. The department shall respond in writing
to any appeal that is properly filed within 60 days of the date of
filing.
   (d) (1) For purposes of this section, "dedesignation" means that a
G-TEDA is no longer a G-TEDA for purposes of either Section 7073 or
7085.1.
   (2) Upon notification by the department of the dedesignation of a
G-TEDA and the end of the appeal period with respect to that
dedesignation, the department shall initiate an application process
for a new designation as provided in Section 7073, 7073.8, 7097, or
7114.  
  SEC. 3.    Section 7085 of the Government Code is
repealed. 
   SEC. 4.   SEC. 8.   Section 7085.1 of
the Government Code is amended to read:
   7085.1.  (a) The governing board of the G-TEDA shall report to the
department by October 1, 2008, and by that date every other year
thereafter, on the activities of the G-TEDA in the previous two
fiscal years and its plans for the current and following fiscal year.
The biennial report shall include at least  both 
 all  of the following:
   (1) The progress the G-TEDA has made during the period covered by
the report relative to its goals, objectives, and commitments set
forth in its original application and the department's memorandum of
understanding with the G-TEDA.
   (2) Identification of the previous two years' funding, including
in-kind funding. The previous two years' funding levels shall be
compared to the funding levels identified in its original application
and the department's memorandum of understanding with the G-TEDA,
and the amount identified in the previous biennial report. An
explanation of any meaningful discrepancies in these amounts shall be
provided. 
   (3) Identification of the financial value of local incentives
provided during the report period, and of federal and other state
resources accessed to serve the residents, workers, and businesses in
the G-TEDA.  
   (4) The following information based on the certification
applications approved in the zones relating to the hiring credit:
 
   (A) The number of jobs for which certifications have been issued.
 
   (B) The number of new employees for which certifications have been
issued.  
   (C) The number of employees replacing previous employees for which
certifications, were issued.  
   (D) The number of employees by qualified employee category
pursuant to Sections 17053.74 and 23622.7 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code.  
   (E) The total range and the average, median, and mean employee
wage rates that were certified.  
   (F) The number of businesses obtaining certification for qualified
employees.  
   (G) The industry classification, based on the North American
Industry Classification System, of businesses obtaining certification
of qualified employees.  
   (H) The distribution of employee certifications among industry
sectors, based on the North American Industry Classification System.
 
   (I) The distribution of employee certifications by the annual
receipts and asset value of the business obtaining qualified employee
certifications.  
   (J) The number of state-certified small businesses that submitted
qualified employee certification applications.  
   (K) The number of state-certified disabled veteran owned-business
enterprises that submitted applications. 
   (b) The progress of the G-TEDA in meeting the goals, objectives,
and commitments set forth in the original application and the
memorandum of understanding with the department shall be reviewed at
least biennially by the legislative bodies comprising the G-TEDA.
   (c) An enterprise zone governing body shall provide information at
the request of the department as necessary for the department to
prepare the report required pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (f).
   (d) (1) G-TEDAs designated prior to January 1, 2007, shall have
until April 15, 2008, to update their benchmarks, goals, objectives,
and funding levels for administering the G-TEDA program, in order to
make them measurable and conducive to the successful completion of
the economic development strategy. The local legislative body and the
department shall approve the updated goals and objectives. The
updated goals and objectives shall be included as an update to the
existing memorandum of understanding between the G-TEDA and the
department.
   (2) G-TEDAs that fail to obtain approved updated goals and
objectives by April 15, 2008, shall be dedesignated effective July 1,
2008. The Director of Housing and Community Development shall
provide notice of prospective dedesignation to the local government
no later than May 1, 2008. The director may authorize up to two 60
calendar day extensions, if the local government and G-TEDA are
acting in good faith and the additional time would allow them to meet
the requirements of this subdivision. Businesses located within a
G-TEDA that have been dedesignated shall continue to have access to
tax incentives previously authorized within the G-TEDA pursuant to
Section 7082.2.
   (3) G-TEDAs designated prior to January 1, 2007, are not required
to implement the biennial reporting requirements of subdivisions (a)
and (b) until October 1, 2009.
   (4) G-TEDAs that expire prior to January 1, 2010, are not required
to meet the conditions of this subdivision.
   (e) The department shall biennially, beginning on or before
December 31, 2008, make available to the Legislature information
related to the progress that each G-TEDA is making toward
implementing its goals, objectives, and commitments set forth in the
original application, the department's memorandum of understanding
with the G-TEDA, and the G-TEDA's biennial report. 
   (f) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5, the department shall submit a
report to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2011, addressing
the period of January 1, 2005, to July 1, 2010, inclusive, and
submit a report every six years thereafter, addressing the period of
the six immediately preceding fiscal years, that evaluates the effect
of the program on employment, investment, and incomes, and on state
and local tax revenues in designated enterprise zones. The assessment
shall differentiate the progress made by G-TEDAs designated prior to
January 1, 2007, and those designated after January 1, 2007.
 
   SEC. 5.  The Legislature finds and declares both of the following:
 
   (a) This is an act by the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic
Development, and the Economy for code maintenance.  

   (b) The changes made by this act to subdivision (e) of Section
7085.1 of the Government Code are technical, nonsubstantive
corrections.  
   (f) G-TEDAs that fail to submit a timely biennial report to the
department shall be audited pursuant to Section 7076.1. This
subdivision shall apply to all reports due on or after October 1,
2012. 
   SEC. 9.    Section 7085.5 of the  
Government Code   is amended to read: 
   7085.5.   (a)    The Franchise Tax Board shall
annually make available to the department and the Legislature
information, by enterprise zone and by city or county, on the dollar
value of the enterprise zone tax credits  and other tax-related
incentives  that are claimed each year by businesses and shall
design and distribute forms and instructions that will allow the
following information to be accessible: 
   (a) 
    (1)  The  total  number of jobs for which the
hiring credits are claimed. 
   (b) The number of new employees for which hiring credits are
claimed.  
   (c) 
    (2)  The number of businesses claiming each individual
tax credit. 
   (d) 
       (3)  The nature of the business claiming each
individual tax credit. 
   (e) 
    (4)  The distribution of zone tax incentives among
industry groups. 
   (f) 
    (5)  The distribution of zone tax incentives by the
annual receipts and asset value of the business claiming each
individual tax credit. 
   (6) The total amount of capital investments made, as well as the
value of the total amount of credit claimed by businesses under the
sales and use tax credit.  
   (g) 
    (7)  Any other information that the Franchise Tax Board
and the department deem to be important in determining the cost to,
and benefit derived by, the taxpayers of the state. 
   (b) In developing this information, the Franchise Tax Board shall
review returns from personal and corporate tax returns. The totals
for each tax incentive shall, at a minimum, be reported separately.