BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1430
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 11, 2011
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Cameron Smyth, Chair
AB 1430 (Committee on Local Government) - As Introduced: April
5, 2011
SUBJECT : The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000 omnibus bill.
SUMMARY : Makes several minor, non-controversial changes to the
laws affecting local government organization and reorganization.
Specifically, this bill :
1)Revises various definitions contained in the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of
2000 (Act).
2)Make other minor technical and conforming changes to
provisions contained in the Act for consistency purposes.
EXISTING LAW establishes the procedures for the organization and
reorganization of cities, counties, and special districts.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS :
1)As statutes go into effect, local officials and others often
discover problems or inconsistencies in the language of the
law and approach the Legislature to correct them. These minor
problems do not warrant separate bills, particularly since,
according to the Legislative Analyst, in 2001-02 the average
cost to produce a single bill was $17,890.
The Assembly Local Government Committee has found that it is
expeditious and relatively inexpensive to respond to multiple
minor, non-controversial requests on related issues by
combining them into an annual "omnibus bill." Since AB 720
(Local Government Committee), Chapter 388, Statutes of 2001,
which was a clean-up bill for AB 2838 (Hertzberg), Chapter
761, Statutes of 2000, the major rewrite of the laws governing
local agency organization and reorganization, the Committee
has focused its omnibus bill efforts on LAFCO-related issues,
most recently with AB 2795 (Local Government Committee),
AB 1430
Page 2
Chapter 47, Statutes of 2010. The Committee has carried on
this practice this year by addressing a number of minor, but
still necessary, changes in this bill. The bill reflects the
concerns of LAFCOs and others who have brought proposals and
issues to the Committee. All proposals have been thoroughly
vetted by a large number of stakeholders. Any proposal that
provokes any controversy or opposition is rejected for
inclusion.
2)Support Arguments: This bill provides an efficient and
cost-effective way to make a number of minor technical and
non-controversial changes to law, rather than introducing a
bill for each change.
Opposition Arguments: None at this time.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
CALAFCO �SPONSOR]
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by : Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)
319-3958