BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1446 (Feuer) 
          As Amended  May 17, 2012
          Majority vote 

           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    7-1         TRANSPORTATION      11-1        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Smyth, Alejo, Bradford,   |Ayes:|Bonnie Lowenthal,         |
          |     |Campos, Davis, Gordon,    |     |Achadjian, Blumenfield,   |
          |     |Hueso                     |     |Bonilla, Buchanan, Eng,   |
          |     |                          |     |Carter, Galgiani, Norby,  |
          |     |                          |     |Portantino, Solorio       |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight                    |Nays:|Jeffries                  |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      13-4                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Norby, Solorio  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Wagner           |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Allows the Los Angeles County Metropolitan 
          Transportation Authority (MTA), subject to voter approval, to 
          extend the length of imposition of an existing transactions and 
          use tax of 0.5% for specified purposes. Specifically,  this bill  : 
           

          1)Allows MTA to extend an existing transactions and use tax 
            approved by voters in 2008 beyond the existing 30-year period, 
            without a limit as to its duration, subject to the following:

             a)   The extension shall be proposed in a transactions and 
               use tax ordinance, or an amendment of the previously 








                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  2

               approved ordinance, and is approved by a majority 
             of the entire membership of MTA; and,

             b)   Provides that the tax can only be imposed if the 
               proposing ordinance, or amended ordinance, is approved by 
               two-thirds of the voters voting on the measure in a special 
               or general election.

          2)Allows MTA to incur bonded indebtedness payable from the 
            proceeds of the tax extension pursuant to MTA's bond issuance 
            provisions in existing law, and any successor act, and 
            specifies that proceeds from the bonds must be used to 
            accelerate the completion of the capital projects and capital 
            programs listed in existing law for MTA, and for operations as 
            specified.

          3)Requires, upon completion of the projects identified in 2) 
            above, that any funds remaining from the bonds and any funds 
            remaining from the proceeds of the tax, after payment of the 
            bonded indebtedness, must be deposited in MTA's sales tax 
            revenue fund to be used for the purposes of projects and 
            programs contained in the expenditure plan or MTA's Long Range 
            Transportation Plan (LRTP) or its successor plans, and for 
            operation costs as specified.

          4)Requires MTA, prior to submitting the ordinance to the voters, 
            to amend the expenditure plan with updates of the estimated 
            total cost for each project or program, the schedule during 
            which MTA anticipates funds will be available for each project 
            or program, and the expected completion dates for each project 
            or program.

          5)Allows revenues raised under the tax extension to facilitate 
            the transportation of people and goods within Los Angeles 
            County.

          6)Clarifies that proceeds from the transactions and use tax can 
            be used as specified without the requirement to bond against 
            the proceeds.

          7)Makes legislative findings and declarations.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Allows MTA to impose a transactions and use tax at a rate of 








                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  3

            0.5% that is applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated 
            areas of the county for a period not to exceed 30 years.

          2)Provides, for purposes of the imposition of the transactions 
            and use tax, the following requirements:

             a)   The tax shall be proposed in a transactions and use tax 
               ordinance that conforms with specified laws and that is 
               approved by a majority of the entire membership of the MTA;

             b)   The tax may be imposed only if the proposing ordinance 
               is approved by two-thirds of the voters in a specified 
               manner; and,

             c)   The proposing ordinance shall specify, in addition to 
               the rate of tax and other matters, that the tax be imposed 
               for a period not to exceed 30 years and the net revenues 
               derived from the tax are to be administered and allocated 
               by the MTA as specified.

          3)Allows MTA to incur bonded indebtedness payable from the 
            proceeds of the tax.

          4)Requires MTA, prior to submitting the ordinance to the voters, 
            to adopt an expenditure plan for the net revenues derived from 
            the tax, as specified.

          5)Allows transactions and use taxes by qualifying entities to be 
            imposed at a rate of 0.25% or a multiple thereof, if the 
            following requirements are met:

             a)   The ordinance proposing the tax must be approved by a 
               two-thirds vote of all members 
             of the governing body;

             b)   If for general purposes, the tax must be approved by a 
               majority vote of the voters in the city or county;

             c)   If for specific purposes, the tax must be approved by a 
               two-thirds vote of the voters in the city or county; and,

             d)   The maximum combined rate of transactions and use taxes 
               in any location may not exceed 2%.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 








                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  4

          Committee:

          1)Increased revenues to the MTA if the tax is approved again by 
            MTA and the voters.  The amount of new revenues should be 
            roughly similar to those raised by Measure R, the original 
            sales tax, which is expected to raise $40 billion over 30 
            years.

          2)Negligible direct state fiscal impact.

           COMMENTS  :  SB 314 (Murray), Chapter 785, Statutes of 2003, 
          originally enacted provisions that authorized MTA to impose a 
          0.5% sales tax, for no more than six and one-half years, for 
          specific transportation projects and programs.  That sales tax 
          was never imposed. 

          AB 2321 (Feuer), Chapter 302, Statutes of 2008, modified those 
          provisions to require MTA's tax ordinance to specify that the 
          tax is imposed for a period not to exceed 30 years, and required 
          the MTA to include specified projects and programs in its Long 
          Range Transportation Plan.  AB 2321 additionally required MTA to 
          notify members of the Legislature representing the County of Los 
          Angeles of proposed amendments to the expenditure plan, as 
          specified, and authorized MTA to incur bonded indebtedness.  In 
          November of 2008, more than 67% of Los Angeles County voters 
          approved this tax in a ballot measure known as Measure R.

          This bill authorizes MTA to place on the ballot for Los Angeles 
          County voter approval the permanent extension of an existing 
          countywide 0.5% sales and use tax.  Revenue from the existing 
          0.5% tax is dedicated to construction and operation of rail, 
          highway, and bus projects in MTA's Long Range Transportation 
          Plan, as well as local initiatives such as street and signal 
          improvements, bicycle and pedestrian projects, and more.  The 
          bill is author-sponsored.

          According to the author, this bill is intended to give Los 
          Angeles County voters the opportunity to extend the duration of 
          a local source of funding for an ambitious program of 
          transportation infrastructure projects that will transform the 
          Los Angeles region.  The anticipated new revenue can be bonded 
          against to build projects in MTA's transportation plan sooner.

          The author notes that efforts are underway to obtain federal 
          loans secured by Measure R revenues to expedite the construction 








                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  5

          of Measure R projects.  While these efforts may yet succeed, 
          under all circumstances additional Measure R revenues will be 
          necessary to accelerate Measure R projects to the maximum 
          extent.  The bill does not change the project list already 
          contained in current law and all Measure R rail, highway, bus 
          and other projects will be accelerated at the same rate, without 
          prioritizing any one category.

          California's Transactions and Use Tax Law was adopted in 1969 to 
          authorize the adoption of local add-on rates to the combined 
          state and local sales tax rate.  Over the years, the law was 
          amended to provide specific authorizations for various 
          particular cities, counties, special districts and countywide 
          authorities.  Prior to 2003, the most common transactions and 
          use tax measures were those for a specific countywide need, 
          usually related to transportation.  Since a 2003 change in law 
          (SB 566 (Scott), Chapter 709, Statutes of 2003)), add-on taxes 
          by cities and some counties for general purposes have become 
          more frequently imposed.

          This bill allows MTA to impose a transactions and use tax with 
          no limit as to the duration 
          of the tax.  The Legislature may wish to ask the author first 
          why the existing 30-year authority granted in 2008 through 
          legislation and approved by voters is not enough, and second, 
          why, four years later, an extension is needed but no limit is 
          specified. 

          Support arguments:  The Los Angeles Economic Development Council 
          estimated in 2008 that Measure R projects alone will create 
          166,000 jobs.  This bill will help to expedite the building of 
          transportation projects in Los Angeles County.

          Opposition arguments: The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 
          has concerns about the bill's intent to use the revenue stream 
          for the purpose of incurring additional debt and believes that 
          the risks of getting money upfront to complete projects will far 
          outweigh the rewards.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 
          319-3958 


                                                                FN: 0003686








                                                                  AB 1446
                                                                  Page  6