BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW
Mark Leno, Chair
Bill No: AB 1491
Author: Committee on Budget
As Amended: June 13, 2012
Consultant: Brady Van Engelen
Fiscal: Yes
Hearing Date: June 14, 2012
Subject: Continued funding for the Alfred E. Alquist
Seismic Safety Commission
Summary: Statutory changes necessary for the continued
funding of the Seismic Safety Commission.
Background: Existing law provides for the Seismic Safety
Account within the Insurance Fund. Funds within the account
may be appropriated by the Legislature to support the
activities of the Seismic Safety Commission and certain
administrative costs incurred by the Department of
Insurance. Existing law provides for assessments levied
against certain insurers to be deposited within the Seismic
Safety Account. The provisions establishing the Seismic
Safety Account and authorizing these assessments is set to
expire on July 1, 2012.
Proposed Law: This bill would make the following changes:
Continued funding for the Seismic Safety Commission.
Requires the Department of Insurance to calculate an annual
assessment to be charged to each commercial and residential
property exposure based on specified factors. Requires the
insurer to collect the assessment and remit it to the
Department of Insurance unless the insurer elects to pay
the assessment on the insured's behalf.
Fiscal Effect: Budget Bill Language has been included in
the 2012 Budget Act that would be implemented if this
measure does not receive the necessary votes for passage.
The adopted budget bill language would allow the Department
of Finance to augment the Seismic Safety Commission's
budget by $923,000 in General Fund in the event that fee
revenue is no longer available to cover the costs to
-1-
support the commission."
Support: Unknown
Opposed: Unknown
Comments: This bill provides the necessary statutory
references for the continued existence of the Alfred E.
Alquist Seismic Safety Commission. This bill would extend
the operation of these provisions indefinitely. This bill
is subject to a 2/3 vote.
-2-