BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1525
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 9, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 1525 (Allen) - As Amended: March 22, 2012
Policy Committee: Aging and
Long-Term CareVote: 4-1
Public Safety Vote: 4-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill makes a person or entity engaged in money transmission
a mandated reporter of suspected financial abuse of an elder or
dependent adult. Specifically, this bill:
1)Adds money transmitters to the list of mandated reporters of
suspected elder and dependent adult financial abuse, and
subjects money transmitters to the same reporting standards as
those that currently apply to employees and officers of
banking institutions in California.
2)Defines "money transmitter" as a person or entity engaged in
selling or issuing payment instruments, or in receiving money
for transmission.
3)Makes a money transmitter, and the employer of a money
transmitter, subject to civil penalties for failure to report
suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult.
FISCAL EFFECT
Potential minor court costs, if this bill resulted in a small
number of new limited civil filings for failure to report
suspected financial abuse.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . Existing law mandates reporting of suspected elder
and dependent adult financial abuse by all officers and
employees of certain financial institutions. The author
AB 1525
Page 2
states by folding money transmitters into this existing
financial abuse reporting framework, this bill provides
greater protections against financial abuses of vulnerable
elders and their families that are desperately needed,
especially in such dire economic times.
2)Opposition . The Money Services Roundtable (TMSRT), which
represents non-bank money transmitters such as MoneyGram and
Western Union, opposes this bill as unworkable. They argue
they have already instituted fraud protection measures, such
as point-of-sale written warnings. They further assert money
transmitters do not actually interact with customers and that
the retail agents who do interact with customers, such as
convenience store clerks, do so one a one-time basis.
According to TMSRT, the existing framework that applies to
depository institutions is not appropriate because agents lack
both training and basic information about the customer that
would be necessary to spot financial abuse.
Analysis Prepared by : Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081