BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1530
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 16, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    AB 1530 (Huffman) - As Amended:  May 2, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and 
          Taxation     Vote:                            7-1
                        JEDE                                  4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY 

          This bill establishes the Clean Manufacturing and Job Creation 
          Incentive Act of 2012.  Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Authorizes any city, county, or city and county to establish a 
            clean manufacturing zone within its boundaries by ordinance or 
            resolution for the purpose of providing incentives to 
            manufacturing businesses to locate within the jurisdiction. 
             
          2)Specifies an extensive list of potential local incentives, 
            ranging from the suspension of locally originated or modified 
            zoning laws and rent controls, to the elimination or reduction 
            of the local government's share of business property taxes, 
            construction taxes or business license taxes.

          3)Requires a copy of the resolution or ordinance to be 
            transmitted to the Governor's Office of Business and Economic 
            Development (GO-Biz) within 60 days of approval.

          4)Requires GO-Biz, within 30 days of receiving an ordinance, to 
            carry out specified activities, including designating a 
            liaison for permit assistance.

          5)Requires state agencies, based on their existing resources and 
            authorities, to prioritize permit and license applications 
            submitted by a manufacturer or a local government.

          6)Sunsets the Government Code (GC) provisions of this bill 
            January 1, 2020.  









                                                                  AB 1530
                                                                  Page  2


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          The cost to the state is dependent on the number of local 
          governments that choose to participate in the program.  Assuming 
          5-10 of California's over 500 cities and counties opt in, GO-Biz 
          would have to hire staff, with costs of approximately $150,000.  
          There would be additional cost pressure on state agencies that 
          are required to assign a higher priority to permit and license 
          applications for facilities within the designated zones.  The 
          cost pressure results because the affected state agencies are 
          involved in other permitting and licensing activities, much of 
          which is in response to statutory deadlines, so the work cannot 
          be easily deferred.


           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the author, AB 1530 creates incentives 
            for new manufacturing businesses to locate in California and 
            for existing businesses to remain here and expand.  The author 
            notes the bill is not limited to specific types of 
            manufacturing, and does not circumvent or shortcut the 
            permitting and review process, but it does allow local 
            jurisdictions to designate an appropriate space as a Clean 
            Manufacturing Zone, and provide incentives and assistance.  
            The author argues AB 1530 will stimulate growth in the 
            manufacturing industry, without compromising California's high 
            environmental, public health, and safety standards.

           2)The state's prior tax rebate program  .  In 1993, cities, 
            counties, redevelopment agencies and special districts were 
            authorized to rebate some or all of their property tax 
            revenues to the owners of economic revitalization 
            manufacturing property.  A property tax rebate required a 
            majority vote of the local agency's governing board.  To 
            qualify for the local tax rebate, the economic revitalization 
            manufacturing property had to meet specified criteria.

            When the Legislature extended the program's sunset date to 
            January 1, 2003, it required the Legislative Analyst to report 
            on the program.  In 2002, the Legislative Analyst noted that 
            no local governments had reported giving property tax rebates 
            and, the program was allowed to sunset.









                                                                  AB 1530
                                                                  Page  3

           3)Related legislation.

              a)   AB 1789 (Corbett) of 2004 authorized a county to exempt 
               from property taxation the qualified personal property of a 
               qualified life science entity during its startup period.  
               AB 1789 was held on the Assembly Revenue and Taxation 
               Committee's Suspense File.  

              b)   SB 1767 (Ducheny), of 2004 authorized specified local 
               agencies to provide an economic development incentive to 
               private manufacturing entities.  SB 1767 died in the Senate 
               Committee on Local Government.  

          4)There is no registered opposition to this bill.
            


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081