BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1565
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1565 (Fuentes)
          As Amended  July 6, 2012
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |53-22|(May 30, 2012)  |SENATE: |26-10|(August 28,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2012)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    B.,P. & C.P.  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires prequalification for school public works 
          projects costing $1 million or more and funded by specified 
          funds.  Requires the prequalification questionnaire and uniform 
          system a school district uses to rate bidders on those public 
          works projects to contain at a minimum, issues covered by the 
          questionnaire and guidelines for rating bidders developed by the 
          Department of Industrial Relations (DIR).

           The Senate amendments  : 

          1)Require a school district to use prequalification for any 
            school facility construction project costing $1 million or 
            more and receiving funds from the Leroy Green School 
            Facilities Act of 1998 or any future school bond.  Further 
            requires: 

             a)   Prospective bidders to submit to the school district a 
               standardized questionnaire and financial statement, under 
               oath, which shall not be public records or open to 
               inspection; 

             b)   The school district to adopt and apply a uniform system 
               of rating bidders; 

             c)   The questionnaire, financial statement, and uniform 
               system of rating bidders to contain at a minimum, issues 
               covered by the standardized questionnaire and model 
               guidelines for rating bidders developed by the DIR; and, 

             d)   That a bid accompanying a proposal form shall not be 
               accepted from a bidder who has not both submitted a 
               completed questionnaire and financial statement for 
               prequalification at least 10 days prior to the public bid 








                                                                  AB 1565
                                                                  Page  2

               opening date and been prequalified at least five days prior 
               to the public bid opening date. 

          2)Authorize a school board to establish a prequalification 
            process on a quarterly or annual basis, and stipulates that 
            the prequalification shall be valid for one calendar year from 
            the date of initial prequalification. 

          3)Specify that the provisions of this bill do not preclude a 
            local school district governing board from prequalifying or 
            disqualifying a subcontractor.

          4)Specify that bidders shall include the general contractor, and 
            if utilized, all electrical, mechanical and plumbing 
            subcontractors, as specified, instead of subcontractors who 
            perform more than 3% of the total project cost.  Further 
            requires that the school district make available a list of all 
            prequalified electrical, mechanical and plumbing 
            subcontractors to bidders at least five days prior to the 
            public bid opening date.

          5)Delete prequalification criteria for school districts that opt 
            to prequalify and related reporting requirements.  

          6)Delete the requirement that subcontractors be prequalified. 

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Allows the school district to use the prequalification process 
            for the following public works contracts: 

             a)   Contracts costing $50,000 or more for equipment, 
               materials, supplies, non-construction services, and 
               non-maintenance repairs; or, 

             b)   Contracts costing $15,000 or more for construction 
               projects.  

          2)Requires a school district utilizing prequalification for 
            public works projects to adopt and apply a uniform system of 
            rating bidders based on completed questionnaires and financial 
            statements to determine the size of the contracts upon which 
            each bidder shall be deemed qualified to bid. 

          3)Prohibits school districts from furnishing bid proposal forms 








                                                                  AB 1565
                                                                  Page  3

            to people who have not both submitted a questionnaire and 
            financial statement for prequalification at least five 
            calendar days prior to the public bid opening date and been 
            prequalified at least one calendar day prior to the public bid 
            opening date.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill required prequalification 
          for school construction projects and required the 
          prequalification questionnaire and uniform system of rating 
          bidders to contain substantially similar information, questions, 
          and requirements to the questionnaire and guidelines for rating 
          bidders developed by the DIR. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Senate Appropriations 
          Committee: 

          1)Unknown, but significant ongoing state-reimbursable General 
            Fund (Proposition 98) costs to school districts related to 
            establishing and administering the prequalification process - 
            likely as an additional contract cost for construction 
            management consultants.  (About one-third of school districts 
            meet the enrollment threshold mandated under this bill.)  
            Additional costs would be incurred to address appeals from 
            contractors denied qualification.  If this process added 0.1% 
            to 0.5% to project costs, for every $500 million in 
            state-funded school construction projects, state mandated 
            costs would be $500,000 to $2.5 million.

          2)To the extent this process eliminates unqualified contractors 
            who would otherwise be the winning bidder, districts might 
            avoid certain costs associated with an underperforming 
            contractor, such as time delays or inferior construction, and 
            any associated legal costs.

          3)The DIR will incur minor one-time costs ($75,000 or less) to 
            determine any impact of the prequalification process on Labor 
            Code violations and to make any recommendations for improving 
            the process.

           COMMENTS  :   Prequalification can be used by public entities to 
          prequalify interested bidders prior to the actual bid.  
          Interested bidders are required to submit a questionnaire, 
          financial statement, a notarized statement from a surety, and 
          proof of insurance.  Prequalification enables public entities to 
          score a contractor based on previous performance, compliance 








                                                                  AB 1565
                                                                  Page  4

          with health, safety, and labor laws, and the completion of 
          recent projects.  Prequalification also allows public entities 
          to determine whether a contractor has previously worked on 
          school construction projects or has a record of litigation and 
          criminal convictions related to construction work.  
          
          AB 574 (Hertzberg), Chapter 972, Statutes of 1999, allowed many 
          public agencies to require licensed contractors wishing to bid 
          on public works jobs to prequalify for the right to bid on a 
          specific public works project.  AB 574 further authorized public 
          entities to require prospective bidders to complete 
          questionnaires and required the DIR, in collaboration with 
          affected agencies and interested parties, to develop a 
          standardized questionnaire and model guidelines for rating 
          bidders that public entities may use.  AB 574 applied to all 
          cities, counties, and special districts, but did not apply to 
          K-12 school districts.

          Existing law authorizes every public agency to adopt a 
          prequalification system.  Current law allows a public agency to 
          establish two different kinds of prequalification procedures for 
          public works projects.  A public agency may establish a 
          prequalification procedure linked to a single project or adopt a 
          procedure by which a contractor may qualify to bid on projects 
          put out for bid by that particular agency for a period of one 
          year after the date of initial prequalification. 

          A public agency that requires prequalification must use a 
          standardized questionnaire and financial statement, adopt and 
          apply an objective uniform system of rating bidders based on 
          completed questionnaires and financial statements, and create an 
          appeals process to allow a contractor denied prequalification to 
          challenge that determination.  

          Current law does not mandate a public entity to utilize the 
          prequalification process or require that an expenditure amount 
          trigger the use of the prequalification process.

          This bill, as amended in the Senate, is consistent with Assembly 
          actions. 


           Analysis Prepared by :    Joanna Gin / B.,P. & C.P. / (916) 
          319-3301 









                                                                  AB 1565
                                                                  Page  5


                                                               FN: 0005524