BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                AB 1569
                                                                Page  1


        ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
        AB 1569 (Allen)
        As Amended April 16, 2012
        Majority vote 

         HEALTH              15-3        JUDICIARY           10-0        
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Monning, Logue, Atkins,   |Ayes:|Feuer, Wagner, Atkins,    |
        |     |Eng, Garrick, Gordon,     |     |Dickinson, Gorell, Huber, |
        |     |Roger Hern�ndez, Torres,  |     |Jones, Monning,           |
        |     |Mansoor, Mitchell,        |     |Wieckowski, Bonnie        |
        |     |Nestande, Pan, V. Manuel  |     |Lowenthal                 |
        |     |P�rez, Silva, Williams    |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
        |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
        |Nays:|Ammiano, Hayashi, Smyth   |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         APPROPRIATIONS      16-0                                        
         
         -------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |
        |     |Bradford, Charles         |
        |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
        |     |Donnelly, Gatto, Hall,    |
        |     |Hill, Lara, Mitchell,     |
        |     |Nielsen, Norby, Solorio,  |
        |     |Wagner                    |
        |     |                          |
         -------------------------------- 
         SUMMARY  :  Extends the sunset date in current law providing counties 
        with the option to implement court-ordered assisted outpatient 
        treatment (AOT) programs for mentally ill persons from January 1, 
        2013, to January 1, 2017, and requires a related evaluation report 
        to be submitted to the Legislature by July 1, 2015.  

         EXISTING LAW  : 

        1)Establishes, pursuant to AB 1421 (Thomson), Chapter 1017, Statutes 
          of 2002, the AOT Demonstration Project Act of 2002 (Act) to permit 
          counties to provide AOT services for people with serious mental 
          illnesses when a court finds that a person's recent history of 
          hospitalizations or violent behavior, and noncompliance with 








                                                                AB 1569
                                                                Page  2


          voluntary treatment, indicates the person is likely to become 
          dangerous or gravely disabled without the court-ordered outpatient 
          treatment.

        2)Sunsets the Act on January 1, 2013, and requires the Department of 
          Mental Health (DMH) to submit a report and evaluation to the 
          Legislature of all counties implementing an AOT program by July 
          31, 2011.
         
         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

        1)Based on experience to date, likely minor state trial court costs.

        2)Minor, absorbable one-time costs to DMH to collect data from 
          counties and prepare an evaluation report.

        3)To the extent the involuntary AOT program is implemented more 
          widely throughout the state, and is successful in helping treated 
          individuals avoid hospitalizations or interaction with the 
          criminal justice system, there could be minor avoided costs in 
          local law enforcement or health care programs.  To date, only one 
          county has implemented an AOT program.  

         COMMENTS  :  The author states that scientific research demonstrates 
        that sustained AOT services can be highly successful for individuals 
        with the most severe and persistent mental illnesses.  The author 
        points to numerous studies of New York's AOT law, also known as 
        Kendra's Law, that have found that, in the first five years of the 
        program, the estimated 3,900 individuals who received treatment 
        orders experienced increases in engagement of services and adherence 
        to prescribed medications, and reductions in hospitalizations, 
        homelessness, arrests, and, incarcerations.  The author notes that, 
        while only Nevada County has opted to implement an AOT program in 
        California, this bill is needed to ensure that counties continue to 
        have another tool available for providing the legal and clinical 
        treatment structure necessary to give severely mentally ill 
        individuals who chronically refuse voluntary treatment the support 
        they need to achieve stability and meaningful recovery in their 
        communities.

        According to a December 2011 report that DMH submitted to the 
        Legislature, as required by AB 2357 (Karnette), Chapter 774, 
        Statutes of 2006, which extended the sunset date of AB 1421, from 
        2008 to 2013, the only fully implemented AOT program is in Nevada 








                                                                AB 1569
                                                                Page  3


        County where it has been operational since 2008.  For fiscal years 
        (FY) 2008-09 and 2009-10, data show that the AOT program served a 
        total of four court-ordered individuals over two years.  However, 
        DMH notes that recent data suggest an additional six individuals 
        were served by Nevada County through FY 2010-11.  According to the 
        report, 75% of referrals to Nevada County's AOT program result in a 
        "voluntary" agreement by the individual to accept mental health 
        treatment assistance.  Of the four individuals served by Nevada 
        County's program, the data show that the total hospitalization days 
        for all individuals in the 12 months prior to AOT were 239, compared 
        to 97 days during their participation in the program.  

        Supporters of this bill, including the California Psychiatric 
        Association, the California State Sheriffs' Association, and the 
        National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, state that AB 1421 needs to 
        be extended because it is a valuable early intervention alternative 
        to revolving door hospitalization and incarceration for a small 
        group of individuals who meet certain stringent criteria and 
        occupies a unique niche in counties' continuum of care that supports 
        recovery from severe and persistent mental illness.  They note that, 
        in Nevada County, AOT saved $1.81 in hospitalization and 
        incarceration costs for every $1.00 invested and it has had a 
        positive fiscal impact on decreasing costs to other county systems, 
        such as emergency departments, ambulance, law enforcement, and the 
        courts.  

        Opponents of this bill, including Disability Rights California, the 
        American Civil Liberties Union of California, and other patient 
        advocacy groups, argue that AOT is unnecessary as there are good 
        alternatives to ensure access to needed mental health services; AOT 
        has not been widely implemented and does not work; and, the current 
        Lanterman-Petris Short Act law allows for involuntary mental health 
        treatment under statutorily defined criteria.  They maintain that 
        forced treatment is inconsistent with mental health recovery 
        principles of self-determination and empowerment and state that 
        California should increase the availability of a full array of 
        voluntary mental health services for the mentally disabled and 
        expand programs that have demonstrated success in saving lives and 
        money.


         Analysis Prepared by  :    Cassie Royce / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097     










                                                                AB 1569
                                                                Page  4


                                                                    FN: 
                                                                    0003380