BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1585|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1585
          Author:   John A. Pérez (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/21/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  8-1, 7/3/12
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Harman, Kehoe, Lowenthal, 
            Pavley, Rubio, Simitian
          NOES:  Wyland
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-1, 8/16/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Dutton, Lieu, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-7, 3/26/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Reappropriation of Proposition 1C bond funds

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill reappropriates $50 million of 
          Proposition 1C bond funds to the Infill Infrastructure 
          Grant Program and the Transit-Oriented Development Program, 
          and transfers the responsibility to perform housing 
          functions of a former redevelopment agency (RDA) to the 
          Department of Housing and Community Development under 
          specified circumstances.  

           ANALYSIS  :    In November 2006, California voters approved 
          Proposition 1C, the $2.85 billion Housing and Emergency 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1585
                                                                Page 
          2

          Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006.  Among other things, 
          Proposition 1C included:

           $790 million for the Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) 
            Program, under which the Department of Housing and 
            Community Development (HCD) offers gap financing grants 
            to cover the costs of infrastructure improvements 
            necessary for the development of higher-density 
            affordable and mixed-income housing in locations 
            designated as infill.

           $300 million for the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) 
            Program, under which HCD  provides grants to cities, 
            counties, and transit agencies for the provision of 
            infrastructure necessary to support mixed-income housing 
            developments within close proximity to a transit station. 
             Housing developers may also obtain loans for the 
            development of the TOD housing units.  

          Over the succeeding years, the Legislature appropriated 
          these funds to HCD, and HCD awarded all of the funds 
          available under both programs.  For various reasons, some 
          awardees have returned their awards, making the funds again 
          available for a new round of awards.  HCD reports that it 
          currently has $25 million available for the IIG Program and 
          another $25 million available for the TOD Program.  HCD 
          made these particular awards in the first rounds of 
          funding, for which its appropriation (i.e., deadline to 
          encumber funds) expired on June 30, 2008.  

          Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor 
          Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed eliminating RDAs and 
          returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to 
          schools, cities, and counties to fund core services.  Among 
          the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to 
          implement the 2011-12 Budget, AB 26X1 (Blumenfield, Chapter 
          5, Statutes of 2011) dissolved all RDAs and established 
          procedures for winding down RDA activity.  Existing law 
          requires successor agencies to dispose of former RDAs' 
          assets and properties, at an oversight board's direction, 
          in an expeditious manner aimed at maximizing value.  
          Successor agencies are required to make any payments 
          related to enforceable obligations, as specified in an 
          adopted recognized obligation payment schedule, and remit 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1585
                                                                Page 
          3

          unencumbered balances of RDA funds and proceeds from asset 
          sales to the county auditor-controller for distribution to 
          local taxing entities in the county. 
          
          This bill:

          1. Appropriates $50 million to HCD as follows: 

             A.    $25 million for the purpose of funding infill 
                incentive grants under the IIG Program with priority 
                going to projects which previously qualified for a 
                grant and received a partial grant.

             B.    $25 million for the purpose of funding 
                transit-oriented grants and loans under the TOD 
                Program.  

          2. Transfers all rights, powers, assets, duties, and 
             obligations associated with the housing activities of a 
             former RDA to HCD under the following circumstances:

             A.    If a local housing authority designated by a city 
                or county to perform the former RDA's housing 
                functions refuses to accept the responsibility.  
                Requires HCD consult the local community regarding 
                expenditures, program administration, and other 
                rights, powers, and obligations, and requires HCD 
                provide contact information on its Internet Web site 
                in order to facilitate local input.

             B.    If a local housing authority designated to perform 
                the former RDA's housing functions initially accepts 
                the responsibility, but later determines it does not 
                implement the same type of housing programs that the 
                RDA did, lacks expertise to implement those programs, 
                and does not foresee the ability to obtain the 
                expertise.  Requires the local housing authority by a 
                two-thirds vote of its commission resolve to no 
                longer perform the housing functions, and notify HCD 
                as specified.

          3. Specifies any funds transferred to HCD in conjunction 
             with the transfer of responsibility for performance of a 
             former RDA's housing functions will be deposited into a 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1585
                                                                Page 
          4

             new State Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.  These 
             funds would be continuously appropriated to HCD for the 
             purpose of increasing the supply of low- and 
             moderate-income housing and awarded on a competitive 
             basis.  Priority would be given to eligible extremely 
             low, very low, and low-income projects.

          4. Authorizes HCD and local housing authorities to recover 
             administrative costs to manage the housing functions of 
             former RDA's consistent with existing RDA law.
          
           Comments  
           
           According to the author's office, it is important to 
          sustain and build critical infrastructure projects in our 
          state, especially in the housing sector.  Given the 
          economic downturn and loss of jobs in the construction 
          industry, the state must use its available resources to 
          stimulate recovery of the economy.   In 2006, the voters 
          approved Proposition 1C and put their faith in government 
          to use bond funds efficiently and as quickly as possible.   
          The appropriation in this bill will allow HCD to issue a 
          Notice of Funding Availability for infill and 
          transit-oriented projects that are shovel-ready and of 
          great value to our communities and neighborhoods. 
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Appropriation of $25 million from the Regional Planning, 
            Housing, and Infill Incentive Account to HCD (bond 
            funds).

           Appropriation of $25 million from the Transit-Oriented 
            Development Implementation Fund to HCD (bond funds).

           Unknown, potentially significant HCD administrative costs 
            to perform the housing functions of a former RDA in those 
            circumstances in which the responsibility is relinquished 
            by local housing authorities.  Actual costs would depend 
            upon the number of jurisdictions that transfer 
            responsibility to HCD, and the composition of the housing 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1585
                                                                Page 
          5

            assets and resources that are transferred.  All HCD costs 
            would be recoverable from housing assets and resources.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/16/12)

          AFSCME
          Bridge Housing
          California Association of Housing Authorities
          California Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies
          Commercial Investment Services
          John Stewart Company
          Oakland Tenants Union
          Resources for Community Development
          Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-7, 3/26/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, 
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Garrick, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Lara, Ma, Mendoza, 
            Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES:  Conway, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Logue, Mansoor, 
            Nielsen, Norby
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cook, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, 
            Harkey, Jones, Knight, Bonnie Lowenthal, Morrell, 
            Nestande, Olsen, Silva, Valadao, Wagner


          JJA:m  8/21/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          




                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1585
                                                                Page 
          6














































                                                           CONTINUED