BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1606
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 28, 2011

            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL 
                                      SECURITY
                              Warren T. Furutani, Chair
                  AB 1606 (Perea) - As Introduced:  February 7, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   Local public employee organizations: impasse 
          procedures.

           SUMMARY  :   Clarifies impasse procedures governing local public 
          agencies and employee organizations.   Specifically,  this bill  :  


          1)Authorizes the employee organization to request that the 
            parties differences be submitted to a fact-finding panel if 
            the parties are unable to effect settlement of the controversy 
            within 30 days after the appointment of a mediator, or if the 
            dispute was not submitted to mediation within 30 days after 
            the date that either party provided the other with written 
            notice of a declaration of impasse.

           EXISTING LAW  , as established by the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act 
          (MMBA):

          1)Contains various provisions intended to promote full 
            communication between public employers and their employees by 
            providing a reasonable method of resolving disputes regarding 
            wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment 
            between public employers and public employee organizations.

          2)Allows, as established by AB 646 (Atkins), Chapter 680, 
            Statutes of 2011, local public employee organizations to 
            request fact-finding if a mediator is unable to reach a 
            settlement within 30 days of appointment.

          3)Allows an employer to implement their last, best and final 
            offer once any applicable mediation and fact-finding 
            procedures have been exhausted and, despite the implementation 
            of the best and final offer, allows a recognized employee 
            organization the right each year to meet and confer.

          4)Delegates jurisdiction over the employer-employee relationship 
            to the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) and charges 
            PERB with resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory 








                                                                  AB 1606
                                                                  Page  2

            duties and rights of local public agency employers and 
            employee organizations.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author, "Ambiguity in the drafting 
          of AB 646 has called into question whether an employer can forgo 
          all impasse procedures, including mediation and fact-finding.  
          In fact, several local government employers argue that AB 646 
          does not require fact-finding if the parties do not engage in 
          mediation.  

          "Last December, PERB adopted emergency regulations to implement 
          the provisions of AB 646. The adopted regulations provide that, 
          if the parties opt to mediate, a fact-finding request can be 
          filed not sooner than 30 days, but not more than 45 days, 
          following the appointment or selection of a mediator. In cases 
          where a dispute is not submitted to a mediator, the request for 
          fact-finding must occur within 30 days following the date that 
          either party provided the other with written notice of 
          declaration of impasse.
           
          "However, the issue whether AB 646 requires that mediation occur 
          as a precondition to an employee organization's ability to 
          request fact-finding remains unresolved.  AB 1606 would clarify 
          that fact-finding is available to employee organizations in all 
          situations, regardless of whether the employer and employee have 
          engaged in mediation."

          Supporters state, "During the PERB rulemaking process, it became 
          apparent that AB 646 was drafted in a manner that called into 
          question whether mediation was a precondition to an employee 
          organization's ability to request factfinding.  Numerous 
          employers and employee organizations provided public comments on 
          the issue.  The majority of interested parties, both employer 
          and labor representatives, urged a reading of AB 646 that 
          provides for a factfinding request whether mediation occurs or 
          not.  In December 2011, PERB adopted emergency regulations that 
          implemented the majority opinion, allowing factfinding to be 
          requested in all circumstances, because they found it to be the 
          most efficient was to implement the entirety of AB 646 and 
          accurately reflect the intent of the Legislature.

          "AB 1606 seeks to provide a final, statutory clarification of 
          this question, by revising the Government Code to allow 








                                                                  AB 1606
                                                                  Page  3

          factfinding in all circumstances in which a local public 
          employer and its employees have reached an impasse in their 
          negotiations.  AB 1606 properly reflects the intent of the 
          Legislature to strengthen collective bargaining by ensuring 
          employers and employees operate in good faith and work 
          collaboratively to deliver government services in a fair, 
          cost-efficient manner."

          Opponents state, "While it is indicated that this bill is 
          intended to be technical and clarifying of existing law, the 
          language states that the panel shall consider different items 
          when reaching their decision.  It is believed these factors take 
          more and more discretion away from the Board (i.e., the 
          financial ability of the public agency, consumer price index, 
          etc.) and puts it into the hands of the fact finding panel.  
          While it is not mentioned in the bill's text, the decision of 
          the fact finding panel will be made public so it could also have 
          political implications.

          "This bill would be applicable to both formal contract 
          negotiations and any Meet and Confer process involving changes 
          to departmental operations that have an impact to the wages, 
          hours or working conditions of employees.  The fact finding 
          panel would be required to consider, weigh, and be guided by the 
          criteria outlines in arriving at their findings and 
          recommendations.  The broad criteria allows for the panel to 
          consider factors normally not considered by the County as being 
          relevant to operations.  The costs of this process or revenue 
          impacts are unknown at this time.  However, many County 
          agencies/departments implement operational changes to gain 
          efficiencies and/or lower costs that require a Meet and Confer 
          process to address impacts to employees.  This bill could 
          significantly impact the proposed changes which could be 
          implemented."

          On December 8, 2011, PERB approved amendments to three 
          regulation sections and the adoption of two new regulation 
          sections as emergency regulations necessary for the 
          implementation of the provisions of AB 646.  The emergency 
          rulemaking package was submitted to the Office of Administrative 
          Law (OAL) on December 19, 2011.  On December 29, 2011, OAL 
          approved the emergency regulatory action, effective on January 
          1, 2012.  Below is the relevant excerpt from those new 
          regulations:









                                                                  AB 1606
                                                                  Page  4

               32802. Request for Factfinding Under the MMBA.

               (a) An exclusive representative may request that the 
               parties' differences be submitted to a factfinding panel. 
               The request shall be accompanied by a statement that the 
               parties have been unable to effect a settlement. Such a 
               request may be filed:

               (1) Not sooner than 30 days, but not more than 45 days, 
               following the appointment or selection of a mediator 
               pursuant either to the parties' agreement to mediate or a 
               mediation process required by a public agency's local 
               rules; or
                
               (2) If the dispute was not submitted to mediation, not 
               later than 30 days following the date that either party 
               provided the other with written notice of a declaration of 
               impasse.


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :   

           Support 
           
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees 
          (Co-Sponsor)
          Peace Officers Research Association of California (Co-Sponsor)
          California Professional Firefighters (Co-Sponsor)
          Service Employees International Union (Co-Sponsor)
          Laborers' Locals 777 & 792


           Opposition 
           
          County of Orange Board of Supervisors
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916) 
          319-3957