BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1647
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1647 (Gordon)
As Amended May 2, 2012
Majority vote
NATURAL RESOURCES 5-1 APPROPRIATIONS 12-0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Chesbro, Dickinson, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield, |
| |Huffman, Monning, Skinner | |Bradford, Charles |
| | | |Calderon, Campos, Davis, |
| | | |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara, |
| | | |Mitchell, Solorio |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Knight | | |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Revises the hearing and enforcement process for waste
tire facility and waste tire hauling violations. Specifically,
this bill :
1)Authorizes the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
(CalRecycle) to issue penalties of $1,000 to $10,000 per day
for violations at major tire facilities, and $500 to $5,000
per day at minor tire facilities.
2)Authorizes CalRecycle to revoke, suspend, or deny a waste tire
facility permit for up to three years if it determines that
the permit was obtained by a material misrepresentation or
failure to disclose relevant factual information, or if the
operator, during the previous three years, has been issued a
final order for, failed to comply with, or has been convicted
of specified violations.
3)Authorizes CalRecycle to revoke, suspend, or deny a waste tire
facility permit for a period of up to five years for a
chronic, recurring pattern of noncompliance, and for five
years or greater for violations that result in a significant
harm to human health or the environment.
4)Authorizes CalRecycle to "serve an administrative accusation"
to any tire hauler subject to civil liability. Specifies that
AB 1647
Page 2
upon receipt of a notice of defense, CalRecycle shall schedule
a hearing within 15 days, and that the hearing be held within
60 days, unless the party waives the right to a hearing.
Requires the director to issue a decision within 60 days of
the hearing.
5)Authorizes CalRecycle to revoke, suspend for up to three years
if it finds that the hauler commits more than three
violations; if the violation poses an immediate threat of harm
to public safety or the environment; if it shows a "repeating
and recurring occurrence" or that the failure to comply may
post a threat to public safety or the environment; or, if the
hauler commits any misrepresentation or omission of a
significant fact or other required information, as specified.
6)Authorizes CalRecycle to revoke, suspend, or deny a waste and
used tire hauler registration for three to five years, or may
suspend, revoke, or deny a waste and used tire hauler
registration permanently, under specified circumstances.
7)Repeals the requirement that hearings relating to these
provisions comply with the formal hearing process before an
administrative law judge and instead establishes informal
hearing requirements.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Requires, pursuant to the California Tire Recycling Act (Act),
CalRecycle to administer a tire recycling program that
promotes and develops alternatives to the landfill disposal of
waste tires. The tire recycling program may include, among
other things, grants, subsidies, and loans to businesses or
other enterprises and public entities involved in activities
that result in reduced landfill disposal or stockpiling of
waste tires. Activities eligible for funding may include the
manufacturing of products made from used tires such as
rubberized asphalt and crash barriers.
2)Requires CalRecycle to adopt a five-year plan, which must be
updated every two years, to establish goals and priorities for
the tire recycling program. Every two years, CalRecycle is
required to submit the adopted five-year plan to the
Legislature.
AB 1647
Page 3
3)The tire recycling program is funded by the California Tire
Recycling Management Fund. The fund is supported by the
California tire fee, which is a $1.75 per tire charge imposed
on a person who purchases a new tire.
4)Establishes an "administrative adjudication bill of rights,"
which specifies fundamental adjudicatory protections,
including (in part) the right to an open hearing, the right to
a written decision, the right to an unbiased decision maker,
and the separation of adjudicatory from adversary functions.
5)Establishes a formal hearing process to determine whether a
right, authority, license, or privilege should be revoked,
suspended, limited, or conditioned. Requires that the process
be initiated by an accusation (a statement of charges) that
allows the "respondent" to prepare a defense. Allows the
respondent 15 days to request a hearing. Formal hearings are
before an administrative law judge.
6)Establishes an informal hearing process for the following:
a) A proceeding where there is no disputed issue of
material fact;
b) A proceeding where there is a disputed issue of material
fact, if the matter is limited to:
i) A monetary amount of not more than $1,000;
ii) A disciplinary sanction against an employee that
does not involve discharge from employment, demotion, or
suspension of not more than five days;
iii) A disciplinary sanction against a student that does
not involve a expulsion from an academic institution or
suspension for more than 10 days; or,
iv) A disciplinary sanction against a licensee that does
not involve an actual revocation of a license or an
actual suspension of a license for more than five days,
but clarifies that this provision does not preclude an
agency from imposing a stayed revocation or a stayed
suspension in an informal hearing.
AB 1647
Page 4
c) A preceding where, by regulation, the agency has
authorized use of an informal hearing; or,
d) A proceeding where an evidentiary hearing for
determination of facts is not required by statute, but
where the agency determines the federal or state
Constitution may require a hearing.
7)Authorizes the presiding officer to deny the use of the
informal hearing procedure or to convert an informal hearing
to a formal hearing under specified circumstances.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, this bill has net costs of a minor, likely absorbable
amount to CalRecycle to hear cases within given timeframes and
provide notices (special fund). (While CalRecycle will face new
workload as a result of this bill, it will also see a reduction
in current workload resulting from preparation of cases for
formal hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH), per existing law. The net effect will likely be a near
wash.)
COMMENTS : According to the author, tire recyclers and
processors have been reporting an increasing number of waste
tires that are being sent to unpermitted facilities. The tires
are trucked to California ports, loaded onto cargo ships, and
transported overseas. An investigative report by Today/Tonight
in Australia found that containers of waste tires are shipped to
Vietnam, offloaded to trucks, and then transported to China (in
violation of Chinese law) where they are burned for fuel. The
transport and burning of these tires generates significant
greenhouse gases and other air emissions.
Legitimate California-based tire recyclers, processors, and
tire-derived product (TDP) manufacturers indicate that they have
noticed as much as a 50% drop in waste tire feedstock. Some
have expressed concern that they may be unable to stay in
business if they have to compete with illegal tire baling
operations.
In response to these concerns, CalRecycle released a bulletin
and held a workshop to discuss the permitting, storage, and
hauling requirements applicable to baled waste tires.
AB 1647
Page 5
CalRecycle states that, "waste tire baling is becoming more
common because it allows for the efficient storing and
transporting of waste tires." Regulations define baled tires as
"whole or altered waste tires that have been compressed and then
secured with a binding material for the purpose of reducing
their volume." Baled tires must be managed as waste tires. The
bulletin clarifies that waste tire baling facilities are waste
tire facilities (not collection facilities) and must be managed
as such; baled tires are not tire derived product (TDP) and are
not exempt from waste tire hauling requirements; common carrier
exemptions may apply to loads of baled tires, but require an
exemption letter from CalRecycle; transportation of baled tires
may result in overweight containers; and, baled tires must be
manifested.
At the workshop, CalRecycle identified 13 "business practice"
changes that they can make administratively to improve
enforcement of waste tire hauling and storage requirements. The
workshop also included a discussion of "statutory options" that
require legislative action. This bill implements two of the
statutory changes identified by CalRecycle to streamline the
enforcement process for violations of waste tire storage and
hauling requirements.
Under current law, hearings relating to the denial, revocation,
or suspension of a waste tire facility permit or a waste tire
hauler registration must go through the formal OAH process.
According to CalRecycle, hearings are scheduled approximately
six months after they are requested, allowing illegal facilities
to continue to operate. This bill establishes an informal
hearing process, with the director of CalRecycle acting as the
presiding officer.
Current law also specifies that a permit cannot be revoked,
suspended, or denied prior to the hearing, except when necessary
"to prevent or mitigate an imminent or substantial endangerment
to the public health or safety or the environment." This bill
allows CalRecycle to revoke, suspend, or deny a permit prior to
a hearing in any case, as determined by the department.
Analysis Prepared by : Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916)
319-2092
AB 1647
Page 6
FN: 0003698