BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1700
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  March 21, 2012

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
                 AB 1700 (Butler) - As Introduced:  February 15, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :  Property taxation: change in ownership: exclusion: 
          cotenancy interests.

           SUMMARY  :  Provides that a "change-of-ownership" reassessment of 
          property is not triggered when one co-owner of a principal 
          residence dies and his or her interest in the property is 
          transferred to the other owner, as specified.  Specifically, 
           this bill  :  

          1)Revises existing property tax law to provide that a transfer, 
            occurring on or after January 1, 2013, of a co-tenancy 
            interest in real property from one co-tenant to the other that 
            takes effect upon the death of the transferor cotenant does 
            not constitute a "change in ownership" only if all the 
            following requirements are satisfied:

             a)   The transfer is solely between and by two individuals 
               who, together, own 100% of the real property in a joint 
               tenancy or as tenants in common;

             b)   As a result of the death of the transferor cotenant, the 
               deceased cotenant's tenancy in common or joint tenancy 
               interest in the real property is transferred to the 
               surviving cotenant, which results in the surviving cotenant 
               holding a 100% ownership interest in the real property 
               immediately after the transfer, thereby terminating the 
               cotenancy;

             c)   For the one-year period immediately preceding the 
               transfer, the real property was co-owned by the transferor 
               and the transferee, and both cotenants have been the owners 
               of record of that real property;

             d)   The real property constituted the principal residence of 
               both cotenants immediately preceding the transfer 
               cotenant's death;

             e)   The transferor and the transferee continuously resided 
               at that residence for the one-year period immediately 








                                                                  AB 1700
                                                                  Page  2

               preceding the transfer; and,

             f)   The transferee has signed, under penalty of perjury, an 
               affidavit affirming that he or she continuously resided 
               with the transferor at the residence for the one-year 
               period immediately preceding the transfer.

          2)Specifies that a transfer of cotenancy interest in real 
            property from one cotenant to the other shall take effect upon 
            the death of the transferor cotenant under any of the 
            following circumstances:

               i)     Pursuant to the transferor cotenant's will or trust, 
                 upon the death of the transferor cotenant;

               ii)    Through intestate succession from the transferor 
                 cotenant; or,

               iii)   By operation of law, upon the death of the 
                 transferor cotenant.
          3)Defines "cotenancy interest" to mean an interest in real 
            property held only as tenants in common or joint tenants.

          4)Defines "principal residence" to mean a dwelling eligible for 
            either the homeowners' exemption or the disabled veterans' 
            exemption.

          5)Provides that no reimbursement is required because of the 
            creation of a new crime or infraction, unless the Commission 
            on State Mandates determines that this bill contains costs 
            mandated by the state.

          6)Declares that no appropriation is made by this act and 
            therefore the state shall not reimburse any local agency for 
            any property tax revenues lost.

          7)Takes immediate effect as a tax levy.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full 
            cash value of that property.

          2)Requires a reassessment of real property to current fair 
            market value upon a "change of ownership of that property," as 








                                                                  AB 1700
                                                                  Page  3

            defined.

          3)Provides that a transfer of property due to death results in a 
            property tax reassessment, unless the transfer qualifies for 
            one of numerous exemptions available under existing law, 
            including a transfer between spouses, domestic partners, 
            parents and their children, grandparents and grandchildren or 
            between persons who own property in a joint tenancy where the 
            surviving joint tenant has the "original transferor" status.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)Existing law protects from property tax increase transfers of 
            real property between married people, registered domestic 
            partners, parents and their children, grandparents and their 
            grandchildren, and also joint tenants who are "original 
            transferors."  This bill creates an exclusion from property 
            tax reassessment for transfers of interest in principal 
            residences between any two people who live together, including 
            unmarried people, persons who are not registered domestic 
            partners, siblings, friends, companions or just roommates who 
            share the cost of housing.  While existing law centers around 
            family members, this bill widens the net further in the case 
            of co-tenants who are not family members.  The Committee may 
            wish to discuss whether this bill creates a precedent.

          2)According to the author, this bill protects surviving 
            co-owners from the financial hardship of property reassessment 
            when a loved one passes away.  The author notes that people 
            who live and own a home together and are unmarried, whether by 
            choice or because of the law, should be treated equally to 
            married couples.

            The sponsor, Equality California, writes that California has a 
            strong policy interest in keeping surviving co-owners in their 
            homes, especially in times of crisis or when they are grieving 
            the loss of a loved one.  Equality California believes that AB 
            1700 "would benefit many Californians, including same-sex 
            couples, seniors and families."

          3)This is not the first attempt at creating an exemption from 
            property tax re-assessment for a co-owner of a principal 
            residence when the other co-owner passes away.  Similar 








                                                                  AB 1700
                                                                  Page  4

            legislation in prior years includes AB 2735 (De Leon, 2010), 
            which would have applied to transfers between the dates of 
            January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2021, and AB 103 (De Leon, 
            2009) which would have applied to transfers between the dates 
            of January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020.  Both bills died in 
            the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

            SB 153 (Migden) was introduced in the 2007-08 Legislative 
            Session and was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger with the 
            following veto message:

            "Existing law already provides that real property transferred 
            between spouses and registered domestic partners, or between 
            parents, grandparents, and children is exempt from 
            reassessment.  Further, co-owners not covered by any of these 
            exemptions have the option of changing a real property title 
            to a joint tenancy, thus ensuring that a reassessment does not 
            occur upon the death of one joint tenant.  Given these 
            exemptions and options provided under existing law, this bill 
            is not necessary."

            SB 565 (Migden), Chapter 416, Statutes of 2005, exempts from 
            reassessment to current fair market value a transfer of any 
            interest in real property between registered domestic 
            partners. 

            Since similar previous bills have either been vetoed or failed 
            passage during the legislative process, the Committee may wish 
            to ask the author and sponsor to explain how this situation 
            has changed from prior years. 

          4)This bill contains provisions that specify that no 
            reimbursement is required for local agencies implementing the 
            bill's provisions and that no appropriation is to be made for 
            reimbursement of any local agency for any lost property tax 
            revenues.  In this way, there is a fiscal cost to local 
            agencies because of annual property tax reductions that will 
            be assumed to occur because of the prohibition to reassess 
            properties under the provisions of the bill.  Additionally, 
            reductions in property taxes to K-12 and community college 
            districts would need to be offset by the state's General Fund. 


          5)Support argument  : Supporters argue that this bill will protect 
            surviving co-owners from the financial hardship of property 








                                                                  AB 1700
                                                                  Page  5

            reassessment when a loved one passes away.

             Opposition argument  : This bill may result in reduced property 
            taxes to local agencies which will impact the state's general 
            fund because of the need to backfill schools.

          6)AB 1700 is double-referred to the Assembly Revenue & Taxation 
            Committee.






           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   
                                               
           Support 
           
          Equality California �SPONSOR]

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 
          319-3958