BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageA
          Date of Hearing:   April 24, 2012

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS
                                Bob Wieckowski, Chair
                AB 1704 (Huffman) - As Introduced:  February 15, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   Coal tar pavement sealants.

           SUMMARY  :   Prohibits the selling or applying of coal tar 
          pavement sealant products. Specifically,  this bill  :

             1.   Makes legislative findings concerning stormwater 
               contamination and the environmental and public health risk 
               from coal tar sealants and the polycyclic aromatic 
               hydrocarbons (PAHs) contained in coal tars.

             2.   Prohibits, beginning January 1, 2013 a person shall not 
               sell in this state a material that contains coal tar that 
               is intended for use as a pavement sealant.

             3.   Prohibits, beginning July 1, 2013,  a person from 
               applying a material that contains coal tar that is intended 
               for use as a pavement sealant on a driveway, parking area, 
               airport runway or playground.

             4.   Authorizes the Department of Toxic Substance Control 
               (DTSC) to issue a notice of corrective action to a person 
               in violation of the coal tar sale and use prohibition.

             5.   Authorizes a city or county to adopt an ordinance 
               providing for enforcement of the requirements of the coal 
               tar pavement sale and use prohibition.  The enforcement of 
               the local ordinance will be concurrent with DTSC's to 
               enforce this section.

           EXISTING LAW:
           
             1.   Under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act 
               of 1986 (commonly known as Proposition 65), requires the 
               Governor to revise and publish a list of chemicals that 
               have been scientifically proven to cause cancer or 
               reproductive toxicity each year.

             2.   Prohibits any person in the course of doing business in 
               California from knowingly exposing any individual to a 









                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageB
               chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive 
               toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning, 
               and prohibits such chemicals from being discharged into the 
               drinking water.

             3.   Authorizes the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to 
               control air pollution and to control criteria pollutant 
               emissions from specific source categories, including from 
               consumer products.

             4.   Authorizes CARB to regulate the emission of "toxic air 
               contaminants," defined as an air pollutant that may cause 
               or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious 
               illness, or that may pose a present or potential hazard to 
               human health (Health and Safety Code �39655).
             5.   Requires CARB to adopt regulations to achieve the 
               maximum feasible reductions in volatile organic compounds 
               (VOCs) emitted by consumer products (Health and Safety Code 
               �41712(b)).

             6.   Requires the DTSC to adopt regulations to establish a 
               process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical 
               ingredients in consumer products that may be considered a 
               "chemical of concern," in accordance with a review process, 
               as specified.

             7.   Requires DTSC to adopt regulations to establish a 
               process to evaluate chemicals of concern, and their 
               potential alternatives, in consumer products in order to 
               determine how best to limit exposure or to reduce the level 
               of hazard posed by a chemical of concern, as specified.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Not Known

           COMMENTS  :

           Need for the bill:   According to the author, "This bill is 
          proposing to ban the sale and use of coal tar sealants in 
          California due to their toxicity, carcinogenicity, and ability 
          to imperil watersheds, aquatic species, and contribution to 
          noxious indoor air quality in homes and buildings near coal tar 
          paved parking lots, driveways and playgrounds.  Under current 
          law, coal tar sealant is permissible to use in California.  Coal 
          tar sealants are  not a necessity  for public safety or public 
          health.  Cost comparable alternatives - asphalt sealants - are 









                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageC
          available and widely used in California.  Austin, TX, Washington 
          State, Washington DC, and two counties in Wisconsin have all 
          enacted bans, and federal legislation, HR 4166, has been 
          introduced to enact a nation-wide ban."

           Coal tar sealant  .  Coal tar is used as a sealant and is applied 
          on top of asphalt in parking lots, pavements, driveways, airport 
          runways, playgrounds, roads and other applications.  According 
          to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US/EPA), 
          there are two types of sealcoats generally used in the U.S. 
          today:  asphalt emulsion and coal tar emulsion.  Coal tar has 
          been shown to have a detrimental effect on the overall health of 
          a variety of aquatic organisms.  Recent literature has suggested 
          that coal tar-based asphalt sealants have impacted survival and 
          development of amphibians, embryo and larval mortality in fish, 
          and growth and biodiversity of macro invertebrates and benthic 
          phytoplankton.  The primary components of coal tar that are 
          presumably responsible for these toxic effects are PAHs.<1>

          Coal tar based pavement sealant (also known as sealcoat) is 
          widely used in the central and eastern U.S. and, to a lesser 
          extent, in the western U.S., where use of asphalt-based sealant 
          products is more common.  An estimated 320 million liters (85 
          million gallons) of coal-tar-based sealant use annually in the 
          United States has been reported.<2>

          A limited number of PAHs have been listed as chemicals known to 
          the State to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and 
          Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65, California Health 
          and Safety Code Section 25249.5 et seq.).  PAHs are generated by 
          combustion or pyrolysis of organic materials, and occur widely 
          as environmental pollutants, food contaminants (especially of 
          smoked or grilled food) and components of soots, tars and other 
          wastes and by-products of industrial processes.  They are found 
          in the particulate fractions of engine exhausts and other 
          emissions from mobile or stationary combustion sources.  PAHs 
          also occur in materials such as crude oil, coal, carbon blacks, 
          coal tar, and in some mineral oils.

           Coal tar sealant use in California.   There is no data provided 
          ---------------------------
          <1> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Assessment of Water 
          Quality of Runoff from Sealed Asphalt Surfaces,  September 2011.
          <2> Peter C. Van Metre, et al., "PAH volatilization following 
          application of coal-tar-based pavement sealant",  Atmospheric 
          Environment,  13 January 2012.








                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageD
          on the use of coal tar sealant in California.  The author has 
          not been able to identify any specific use of or applications of 
          coal tar sealants in California, nor is there evidence of coal 
          tar related PAHs discharge or exposure.  One potential reason 
          for this lack of evidence may be the state's strict air quality 
          standards for consumer products and the likelihood that most 
          coal tar sealants fail to meet the VOC standards.  
           
          According to the South Coast Air Quality Management District 
          (SCAQMD) no coal tar containing pavement sealers (parking lots 
          and roadways) are sold for use in the SCAQMD.  The VOC limit of 
          100g/l limits for waterproofing sealers and traffic coatings 
          limits coal tar formulations.

          The SCAQMD has also reported that here was a negligible amount 
          of industrial maintenance coating reported in 2010 by one 
          manufacturer that includes coal tar (total of 1,379 gallons or 
          0.004% of the gallons sold in 2010), comprised of coal tar epoxy 
          resin technology.  This high performance use of the coal tar 
          does not result in the type of leaching into the environment 
          that occurs from the coal tar asphalt sealers.

           State and federal legislation on coal tar sealants  .  In 2011 the 
          state of Washington adopted a ban on the sale and use of coal 
          tar sealants on driveway or parking areas containing levels of 
          PAHs in excess of 10,000 mg/kg.  On March 8, 2012 HR. 4166 - 
          Coal Tar Sealants Reduction Act of 2012 was introduced in 
          congress to prohibit the manufacture, processing, distribution 
          in commerce, and use of coal tar sealants and to provide a 
          nationwide ban on coal tar pavement sealant use by 2015.

           ISSUES OF CONCERN:
           
           California's Green Chemistry Initiative  :  In 2008, the Governor 
          signed AB 1879 and SB 509 into law, which enacted California 
          Green Chemistry Initiative.  AB 1879 (Feuer and Huffman) Chapter 
          559, Statutes of 2008, requires DTSC to adopt regulations to 
          identify and prioritize chemicals of concern, to evaluate 
          alternatives, and to specify regulatory responses where 
          chemicals of concern are found in consumer products.  SB 509 
          (Simitian) Chapter 560, Statutes of 2008, requires DTSC to 
          establish an online, public Toxics Information Clearinghouse 
          that includes science-based information on the toxicity and 
          hazard traits of chemicals used in daily life.










                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageE

          The Green Chemistry program should yield a comprehensive process 
          to identify and manage chemicals of concern and their 
          alternatives.  The provisions of AB 1704 would pre-empt the 
          authority of the DTSC to take additional actions under the Green 
          Chemistry Program.

           Regrettable Substitutions  :  When a specific product or substance 
          is banned, the alternative may result in even more severe public 
          health and environmental consequences than were brought about by 
          the original substance.  To avoid this problem, alternatives to 
          coal tar sealants should be analyzed to limit exposure and to 
          reduce the level of hazard they may pose.  The experience with 
          lead jewelry and MTBE has shown the potential or unanticipated 
          adverse effects of replacement or substitutions.  Such a process 
          is delineated in the Green Chemistry Initiative, but is lacking 
          from AB 1704.

           The penalties for violating the law lack enforcement  .  AB 1704 
          provides that the DTSC may seek a corrective action order in the 
          event that the prohibition on sale or use of coal tar sealants 
          is violated.  The provisions of Health and Safety Code section 
          25187 allows DTSC to issue orders to require a person take 
          corrective action with respect to the release of hazardous waste 
          or constituents, abate the effects thereof, and take any other 
          necessary remedial action.  This limited action would not 
          include penalties or fines for the sale of coal tar sealants and 
          would be limited to requiring corrective actions in cases where 
          coal tar sealants have been applied.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support
           
          Breast Cancer Fund
          California Coastal Alliance
          Clean Water Action
          Clean Water Network
          Environment California
          Environmental Defense Fund
          Environmental Working Group
          San Francisco Bay Keeper
          Santa Clara Valley Water District
          Save the Bay
          Sierra Club California









                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  PageF
          Surfrider Foundation
          The Help Group

           Opposition
           
          None on file
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Bob Fredenburg / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 
          319-3965