BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 9, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                AB 1704 (Huffman) - As Introduced:  February 15, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Water, Park and 
          Wildlife     Vote:                            5-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill prohibits, effective January 1, 2013, the sale of coal 
          tar pavement products and, effective July 1, 2013, the 
          application of a coal tar pavement product on a driveway, 
          parking area, airport runway or playground.  The bill also 
          authorizes the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to 
          enforce the prohibition on sale and application of coal tar 
          pavement products and cleanup of illegal applications.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual costs of an unknown amount to DTSC, likely in excess of 
          $150,000, for education, outreach, inspection, enforcement, 
          cleanup, corrective action and laboratory testing. (Toxic 
          Substances Control Account (TSCA).)

          (DTSC notes that costs to implement the bill will depend, 
          largely, upon the prevalence of coal tar pavement product use in 
          the state.  Because this prevalence is unknown, DTSC is unable 
          to provide an accurate estimate of the workload it expects to be 
          associated with this bill. The department expresses concern, 
          however, that the bill creates new responsibilities for the 
          department without increasing funding.  DTSC reports that the 
          balance in its administrative funds is particularly low and that 
          the department would find it difficult to absorb new 
          responsibilities with existing resources.  (DTSC just released a 
          budget change proposal to reduce funding from TSCA by 24 
          positions in the budget year.))

           COMMENTS  









                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  Page  2

           1)Rationale  .  The author contends coal tar pavement products are 
            toxic, carcinogenic and harmful to wildlife and ecosystems and 
            it is, therefore, inappropriate to allow their sale or use in 
            California.  The author contends there are safer, economical 
            and effective alternatives to coal tar pavement products.

           2)Background  .  Coal tar is used as a sealant and is applied on 
            top of asphalt in parking lots, pavements, driveways, airport 
            runways, playgrounds, roads and other applications.  Coal tar 
            contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).  According 
            to a recent study of sealed pavement runoff conducted by the 
            United Sates Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 
            sealants applied to asphalt surfaces leached measurable 
            quantities of PAHs.  The US EPA study notes preexisting 
            research finding that coal tar has been shown to have a 
            detrimental effect on the overall health of a variety of 
            aquatic organisms and that the primary components of coal tar 
            that are presumably responsible for these toxic effects are 
            PAHs.  

            It is not clear how much, if any, coal tar paving product is 
            used in California.  The author was not able to provide 
            documentation estimating use of such products in the state.  
            However, the author's office reports a request from the 
            Airport Council to make that organization's members exempt 
            from the bill's prohibition, evidence that coal tar pavement 
            products are used in the state to some extent.  The policy 
            committee analysis notes that the South Coast Air Quality 
            Management District (SCAQMD), the jurisdiction of which covers 
            one of the most populous and heavily industrialized regions of 
            the state, reports no coal tar pavement sealants sold in the 
            district because it exceeds air district limits on volatile 
            organic compounds.  

            Some have expressed concern that this bill, and other bills 
            seeking to ban or limit certain chemicals or products, 
            inappropriately interferes with the Green Chemistry 
            Initiative, which statutorily requires DTSC to adopt 
            regulations to identify and prioritize chemicals of concern, 
            to evaluate alternatives, and to specify regulatory responses 
            where chemicals of concern are found in consumer products.

           3)Support  .  This bill is supported by the Santa Clara Valley 
            Water District and a long list of public health and 
            conservation groups, who are concerned about the health and 








                                                                  AB 1704
                                                                  Page  3

            environmental effects of coal tar pavement product runoff.

           4)There is no opposition formally registered to this bill.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081