BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1722
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 9, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                     AB 1722 (Alejo) - As Amended:  April 9, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :  California Department of Transportation:  changeable 
          message signs  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires, prior to June 30, 2013, the California 
          Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to update its policies 
          regarding changeable message signs, as prescribed.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires Caltrans to update its internal policies to allow the 
            following specific types of changeable message signs displays: 
             

             a)   Safety messages;  

             b)   Transportation-related messages;  

             c)   Reminders to register to vote; and,

             d)   Reminders to vote as elections approach.  

          1)Defines "changeable message sign."  

          2)Provides that this bill's provisions are not intended to alter 
            the requirements of the Emergency Alert System or the Amber 
            Plan, as specifically referenced.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Directs Caltrans, based on consultation with local agencies 
            and after holding public hearings, to adopt and publish rules 
            and regulations prescribing uniform traffic control standards. 
             Caltrans publishes these rules, regulations and standards in 
            the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 
            (California MUTCD).  

          2)Provides that only those official traffic control devices that 
            conform to the California MUTCD may be placed on a street or 
            highway.  









                                                                  AB 1722
                                                                  Page  2

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  : 

           Background  :  Existing federal law requires all states to follow 
          the federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 
          or to at least substantially comply with it.  The federal MUTCD 
          prescribes standards for signs, signals, and pavement markings 
          throughout the nation.  California has adopted its own MUTCD, 
          which has been approved by federal officials as being 
          "substantially in compliance"" with the federal MUTCD-i.e., 
          California's MUTCD has been found to be at least as restrictive 
          as the federal MUTCD.  

          In California, development of the California MUTCD is the 
          responsibility of the California Traffic Control Devices 
          Committee (CTCDC).  The CTCDC is convened and chaired by 
          Caltrans and the committee's membership includes eight voting 
          members representing the California Highway Patrol, the League 
          of California Cities, the California State Association of 
          Counties, and auto clubs.  Meetings of the CTCDC serve as 
          requisite public hearings prior to promulgating rules related to 
          traffic signs, signals, and pavement markings.  

          Both the federal and California MUTCDs include provisions 
          governing changeable message signs.  These provisions stipulate 
          that changeable message signs have a large number of 
          applications, including but not limited to:  

          1)Incident management and route diversion;

          2)Warning of adverse weather conditions;

          3)Special event applications associated with traffic control or 

            conditions;

          4)Control at crossing situations;

          5)Lane, ramp, and roadway control;

          6)Priced or other types of management lanes;

          7)Travel times;









                                                                  AB 1722
                                                                  Page  3

          8)Warning situations;

          9)Traffic regulations;

          10)Speed control; and,

          11)Destination guidance.  

          Both the federal and the California MUTCD also limit the use of 
          changeable message signs to traffic operations, regulatory, 
          warning and guidance information.  The use of changeable message 
          signs for advertising is prohibited; however, safety- and 
          transportation-related messages such as, "DON'T DRINK AND 
          DRIVE," "SEAT BELT BUCKLED?," and "OZONE ALERT CODE RED-USE 
          TRANSIT" are authorized.  

           Discussion  :  According to the author, "AB 1722 would use an 
          existing state infrastructure to increase motorists' awareness 
          of an important civic duty of participating in our state's 
          democracy.  Adding upcoming voter registration deadlines and 
          Election Day to the list of other current sign display messages 
          is an innovative way to use our state's technology to increase 
          civic engagement."  

          The author further asserts that the means by which the state can 
          outreach to voters has become increasingly constrained because 
          of the current fiscal climate.  The author has introduced this 
          bill to increase civic engagement by displaying election-related 
          reminders on changeable message signs for motorists to read.  
          Generally, Caltrans' policy relative to signs is to minimize the 
          number of signs whenever possible, in part, to avoid "sign 
          information overload" which can interfere with motorist ability 
          to assimilate information and respond properly and safely to 
          roadway situations.  In fact, both the federal and California 
          MUTCD provide that, "Traffic control devices or their supports 
          shall not bear any advertising message or any other message that 
          is not related to traffic control."  According to the Federal 
          Highway Administration, "This position is founded on safety and 
          operational concerns, particularly as related to driver 
          distraction.  Highway signs and other traffic control devices 
          convey crucial information.  In order for road users to perceive 
          and respond appropriately to critical information, we must make 
          sure that its conspicuity is preserved so that the safe and 
          orderly movement of traffic is not compromised."  









                                                                  AB 1722
                                                                  Page  4

          Application of these standards has not always been consistent, 
          however,  In fact, Caltrans itself applied to the Federal 
          Highway Administration (FHWA) in 2008 for a waiver to allow 
          California to sell advertising on its changeable message signs 
          as a way to raise revenue, despite the policy concerns regarding 
          driver distractions.  (FHWA never approved the waiver request.)  
          Additionally, changeable message signs are regularly used to 
          notify motorists of abducted persons via "Amber Alerts," which 
          are not technically transportation or safety related.  

           Committee concerns  :  The committee is concerned that displaying 
          non transportation- or safety-related messages will lessen the 
          effectiveness of the changeable message signs and reduce the 
          safety benefits the signs otherwise provide.  Furthermore, this 
          bill sets bad precedent in the use of signs for reasons other 
          than their intended purposes and would undoubtedly lead to 
          efforts to use the signs for other, equally admirable effects, 
          for example, encouraging motorists to donate blood, read books 
          to children, or develop healthy lifestyles.  A proliferation of 
          these other types of messages would further reduce the 
          effectiveness of the changeable message signs on motorist 
          safety.   
           
           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Common Cause

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093