BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1915
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 23, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                    AB 1915 (Alejo) - As Amended:  March 26, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :  Safe Routes to School

           SUMMARY  :  Permits up to 10% of the state's Safe Routes to School 
          (SR2S) program funds to be used to assist eligible recipients in 
          making infrastructure improvements, other than school bus 
          shelters, that create safe routes to bus stops that are located 
          outside the vicinity of schools.

           EXISTING LAW:   

          1)Provides two separate and distinct SR2S programs-one federally 
            funded and one state funded.  The federal program provides 
            grants for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects 
            (such as education and enforcement).  The state program 
            provides grants only for infrastructure projects.  (This bill 
            affects the state SR2S program only; hence, any further 
            reference to the "SR2S" program will be to the state program.) 
             

          2)Establishes the California Department of Transportation 
            (Caltrans) as the multi-modal department responsible for the 
            statewide mobility of people, goods, and services.  Requires 
            Caltrans to administer an SR2S program for construction of 
            bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects.  

          3)Requires Caltrans to award grants to local governmental 
            agencies on a statewide, competitive basis using various 
            factors, as specified, including:  

             a)   Demonstrated need of an applicant;

             b)   Potential to reduce child injuries and fatalities;

             c)   Potential to encourage increased walking and bicycling 
               among students;

             d)   Identification of safety hazards;

             e)   Identification of current and potential walking and 








                                                                  AB 1915
                                                                  Page  2

               bicycling routes to school; 

             f)   Use of a public participation process; and,

             g)   Benefits to a low-income school.  

          4)Requires Caltrans, prior to awarding a construction grant for 
            construction that encompasses a freeway, highway, or county 
            road, to consult with and obtain approval from the California 
            Highway Patrol (CHP) to ensure the proposal complements the 
            CHP's Pedestrian Corridor Safety Program.  

           FISCAL EFFECT :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The goal of the SR2S programs administered by 
          Caltrans is to increase the number of children that walk or 
          bicycle to school by funding projects that remove barriers that 
          prevent or discourage them from doing so.  In 1999, California 
          was the first state in the country to legislate its own state 
          SR2S program with dedicated funding (from the State Highway 
          Account) on the premise that encouraging more children to walk 
          and bicycle to school would result in healthier children, 
          improved air quality, reduced fuel consumption and greenhouse 
          gas emissions, and less traffic congestion near schools.  This 
          year, the SR2S program was funded at $24.25 million.  Funds are 
          distributed on a statewide, competitive basis.  Typical projects 
          in these programs include installing curbs, sidewalks, traffic 
          signals, crosswalks, warning signs, and bicycle paths.  

          The author has introduced this bill to serve the safety needs of 
          low-income rural school children who often depend on buses to 
          transport them to school, often walking along busy roads with 
          insufficient or poor quality walking infrastructure.  

          Supporters of this bill argue that current law does not specify 
          that the SR2S program can support infrastructure improvements to 
          increase pedestrian safety for children walking to school bus 
          stops.  As a result, rural communities that must use buses to 
          get their children to school cannot enjoy the benefits of the 
          SR2S program.  By allowing the SR2S program funds to be used to 
          support infrastructure improvements that might not necessarily 
          be in the proximity of a school, the program can more 
          effectively serve the needs of low-income rural children.  

          Opponents of this bill argue that allowing SR2S funds to be used 








                                                                  AB 1915
                                                                  Page  3

          for bus stops that are not close to a school is in complete 
          opposition to the policy goals of both the state and federal 
          SR2S programs.  

           Previous legislation:

           AB 1475 (Soto), Chapter 663, Statutes of 1999, first enacted the 
          SR2S program until 2002.  Subsequent legislation, SB 10 (Soto), 
          Chapter 600, Statutes of 2001, extended the program until 2005, 
          and SB 1987 (Soto), Chapter 392, Statutes of 2004, extended 
          again until 2008.  Finally, AB 57 (Soto), Chapter 673, Statutes 
          of 2007, eliminated the sunset date, thereby extending the 
          program indefinitely.  

          AB 516 (V. Manuel Perez), Chapter 277, Statutes of 2011, 
          modified the SR2S program to facilitate increased participation 
          from socio-economically disadvantaged schools and communities.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Advancement Project
          Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
          PolicyLink

           Opposition 
           
          WALKSacramento
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093