BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1915
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 9, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 1915 (Alejo) - As Amended: March 26, 2012
Policy Committee:
TransportationVote:13-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill allows up to 10% of the state funds for the Safe
Routes to School (SR2S) program to be allocated for making
infrastructure improvements, excluding school bus shelters, that
create safe routes to bus stops located outside the vicinity of
schools.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs for Caltrans to modify program
guidelines. The bill could result in a reallocation of SR2S
funding, and may alter the proximity of some funded projects
with respect to a school site, but will not change the purpose
of these funds in providing infrastructure improvements along
roadways used by students in their travel to school.
COMMENTS
1)Background . The goal of both the federal and state SR2S
programs is to remove barriers that prevent children from
walking or biking to school. The federal program provides
grants for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects
(such as education and enforcement). The state program
provides grants only for infrastructure projects. In 1999,
California was the first state to enact its own SR2S program,
with dedicated funding from the State Highway Account, on the
premise that encouraging more children to walk and bicycle to
school would result in healthier children, improved air
quality, reduced fuel consumption and greenhouse gas
emissions, and less traffic congestion near schools. The state
SR2S program is to be funded at $45 million in the latest
AB 1915
Page 2
annual cycle, and funds are distributed on a statewide,
competitive basis. Applications exceed available funds by a
6:1 ratio. Typical projects include installing curbs,
sidewalks, traffic signals, crosswalks, warning signs, and
bike paths.
2)Purpose . According to the author, this bill is intended to
serve the safety needs of low-income rural school children who
depend on buses to transport them to school and often walk
along busy roads with insufficient or poor quality walking
infrastructure. Supporters argue that current law does not
specify that the SR2S program can support infrastructure
improvements to increase pedestrian safety for children
walking to school bus stops. As a result, rural communities
that must use buses to get their children to school cannot
enjoy the benefits of the SR2S program.
3)Prior Legislation . AB 516 (V. Manuel Perez)/Chapter 277 of
2011 modified the SR2S program to facilitate increased
participation from low-income communities.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081