BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1917
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 28, 2012

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                                Julia Brownley, Chair
               AB 1917 (Dickinson) - As Introduced:  February 22, 2012

          �Note:  This bill is double-referred to the Assembly Higher 
          Education Committee and will be heard as it relates to issues 
          under its jurisdiction.]
           
          SUBJECT  :   Education finance:  acquisition of food services

           SUMMARY  :   Requires public schools, colleges, and universities 
          to adopt policies to ensure that food service contractors 
          disclose all discounts, allowances, and incentives the 
          contractor receives and pay them to the school, college, or 
          university.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires school district governing boards, the Board of 
            Governors of the California Community Colleges, the Trustees 
            of the California State University, and requests the Regents 
            of the University of California to develop and adopt policies 
            and procedures for the acquisition of food services to ensure 
            a service contractor fully discloses to the school, campus 
            auxiliary organization, or other unit of the public 
            postsecondary segment all discounts, rebates, allowances and 
            incentives received by the service contractor from its 
            suppliers.

          2)Requires the contractor to pay to the above entities the full 
            amount of the discount, rebate or credit.

          3)Requires that a record of such transactions be available for 
            public review as part of any statutorily-required audit.

          4)Requires any necessary changes to contractual agreements be 
            implemented upon the renewal, extension, or amendment of an 
            existing service agreement.

           EXISTING LAW  authorizes school district governing boards to 
          establish cafeterias, which are defined as synonymous with food 
          service.  Existing law also authorizes public postsecondary 
          institutions to enter into agreements for the purchase of goods 
          and services, including food services.  When education 
          institutions enter into agreements with food service contractors 








                                                                  AB 1917
                                                                  Page  2

          for food services, federal regulations require that the 
          contractor credit them for any rebates and other cost reductions 
          the contractor receives from its suppliers.

           FISCAL EFFECT :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   Elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and 
          universities that provide food services are referred to 
          collectively as school food authorities (SFAs).  SFAs typically 
          contract with food service contractors for food services.  
          Contractors then can use their purchasing power to negotiate 
          rebates and other cost reductions from suppliers.  Federal 
          regulations require that such cost reductions be credited back 
          to the SFA.  SFAs are responsible for ensuring that invoices 
          from contractors are net of all applicable discounts, rebates, 
          and credits.

           Oversight hearing.   On March 7, 2012 the Assembly Committee on 
          Accountability and Administrative Review (AAR) held an oversight 
          hearing on "Rebates and Transparency in K-12 and Higher 
          Education Food Service Contracts."  The hearing was prompted by 
          a $20 million settlement in 2010 in New York State that resolved 
          allegations that Sodexo, a food service contractor, had 
          overcharged New York public schools and universities by not 
          remitting rebates collected from its suppliers.  Background 
          information prepared by AAR Committee staff indicates (among 
          other things):

          1)Several contracts reviewed were silent on off-invoice rebates, 
            raising questions in some cases about whether the rebates 
            should have been remitted and may still be owed to the schools 
            involved.

          2)As many as 52 of some 170 food contracts in California may be 
            in violation of rules that prohibit requiring school districts 
            to purchase all food supplies through a contractor's vendors.

          3)California Department of Education (CDE) officials believe 
            food service contractors continue to collect questionable 
            rebates under fixed-price contracts.

          4)The CDE is investigating a complaint from one school district 
            that its food service contractor is collecting and refusing to 
            disclose or remit off-invoice rebates.









                                                                  AB 1917
                                                                  Page  3

           This bill  addresses these issues by codifying the federal 
          regulations requiring the crediting of cost reductions to the 
          SFA and requiring SFAs to develop policies and procedures to 
          ensure compliance.  

           Required State Oversight.   Since 2009, federal regulations have 
          required state education agencies to review and approve Food 
          Service Management Company (FSMC) and Food Service Consulting 
          Company (FSCC) contracts prior to execution.  Contracts, 
          including all supporting documentation, must be reviewed 
          annually, and on-site reviews must be conducted at least once 
          every five years.  A federal audit found the California 
          Department of Education (CDE) to be out of compliance with these 
          requirements.  The CDE agrees with the audit and says the lack 
          of compliance is due to lack of positions.  The CDE submitted a 
          request for 6.5 positions beginning in 2012-13.  The positions 
          would be funded with $556,000 from federal funds already 
          available for this purpose.  The Governor did not approve this 
          request in his 2012-13 budget proposal.  The CDE indicates that, 
          with adequate staffing, it could effectively monitor FSMC and 
          FSCC contracts to ensure compliance with federal regulations and 
          ensure that school districts receive the full credits they are 
          owed.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support  
          None on file

           Opposition 
           None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087