BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          AB 1968 (Wieckowski) - Peace officers: arming probation 
          officers.
          
          Amended: August 6, 2012         Policy Vote: Public Safety 4-3
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 16, 2012                          
          Consultant: Jolie Onodera       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 1968 would authorize a probation officer or 
          deputy probation officer to carry firearms, but only as 
          determined by the chief probation officer on a case-by-case or 
          unit-by-unit basis and only under the terms and conditions 
          specified by the chief probation officer. This bill would 
          require each chief probation officer to develop a policy for 
          arming probation officers and deputy probation officers who 
          comprise high risk caseloads no later than June 30, 2013.This 
          bill would require the policy to be implemented no later than 
          December 31, 2013,

          Fiscal Impact: 
                 One-time state reimbursable costs to local probation 
               departments potentially in the low hundreds of thousands of 
               dollars (General Fund) to develop policies on arming 
               probation officers who supervise high-risk caseloads. 
                 Potential future one-time and ongoing local costs, 
               potentially state-reimbursable, in the range of tens of 
               thousands to low millions of dollars, depending on the 
               timing and extent of local arming policies mandated to be 
               implemented by December 31, 2013. In the absence of a 
               definition of 'high-risk caseloads', the number of 
               potential individuals to be supervised is unclear.

          Background: Under existing law, probation officers and deputy 
          probation officers are peace officers whose authority extends to 
          any place in the state while engaged in the performance of the 
          duties of their respective employment and for the purpose of 
          carrying out the primary function of their employment. Except as 
          specified, these peace officers may carry firearms only if 
          authorized and under those terms and conditions specified by 
          their employing agency. Existing law does not include probation 







          AB 1968 (Wieckowski)
          Page 1


          officers or deputy probation officers among peace officers 
          authorized to carry firearms off duty. Any probation officers 
          who are permitted to carry firearms are required under existing 
          law to meet specified training requirements and must qualify 
          with the firearm at least quarterly.

          Proposed Law: This bill would do the following:
                 Provides that a probation officer or deputy probation 
               officer is authorized to carry firearms, but only as 
               determined by the chief probation officer on a case-by-case 
               or unit-by-unit basis and only under the terms and 
               conditions specified by the chief probation officer.
                 Requires each chief probation officer to develop a 
               policy for arming probation officers and deputy probation 
               officers who comprise high risk caseloads no later than 
               June 30, 2013.
                 Requires the arming policy to be implemented no later 
               than December 31, 2013.

          Related Legislation: AB 2157 (Logue) 2010 would have amended the 
          requirement that probation officers authorized to carry firearms 
          must qualify with that firearm on a quarterly basis and instead 
          required firearms qualification only on a bi-annual basis. This 
          bill failed in the Senate Committee on Public Safety.
          
          Staff Comments: Existing law permits probation officers to be 
          armed only if so authorized by their employing agency. 
          Currently, not all probation departments in California arm their 
          officers. According to the Chief Probation Officers of 
          California, approximately 80 percent of county probation 
          departments currently have armed officers. 

          This bill mandates each chief probation officer to develop a 
          policy for arming probation officers and deputy probation 
          officers who comprise high risk caseloads no later than June 30, 
          2013. The additional staff time and workload necessary to 
          research and develop arming policies for officers supervising 
          high risk caseloads within the six-month time period will result 
          in state-reimbursable costs to local probation departments, 
          likely in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (General Fund) 
          statewide. 

          This bill additionally mandates the arming policies to be 
          implemented by December 31, 2013. Although the specific details 








          AB 1968 (Wieckowski)
          Page 2


          of the policies are left to the discretion of the chief 
          probation officer, the bill requires implementation of the 
          arming policy that has been developed within six months, the 
          associated costs of which could be determined to be 
          state-reimbursable, given the presumptive language contained in 
          the bill stating "Each chief probation shall develop a policy 
          for arming probation officers?" and further mandating "This 
          policy shall be implemented?" The one-time and ongoing costs 
          would vary by local probation department and would be dependent 
          on the number of officers to be armed pursuant to the policy. 
          Staff notes that even in those counties that currently arm 
          probation officers who supervise high risk caseloads, by 
          mandating that each chief probation officer develop a policy for 
          arming its officers and subsequently implement that policy, any 
          existing costs incurred by the counties could be determined to 
          be reimbursable by the state. Ongoing costs could range from 
          tens of thousands of dollars to upwards of several million 
          dollars statewide, based on annual costs for arming, storage, 
          compensation, and training of approximately $6,500 per officer. 

          Proposed Author Amendments: 
           Provide that the provisions of the bill shall apply only to 
            those counties that, prior to January 1, 2013, have neither 
            adopted an arming policy nor that have armed deputy probation 
            officers who supervise high risk parole caseloads.
           Add the following intent language, "It is the intent of this 
            bill that in any county which has neither adopted an arming 
            policy nor armed deputy probation officers supervising state 
            high risk parolees, the Chief Probation Officer shall consider 
            the safety of their employees as his or her primary 
            consideration prior to adopting an arming policy. Nothing 
            herein is intended to limit, or shall limit, the discretion of 
            the Chief Probation Officer regarding arming of deputy 
            probation officers nor require that the Chief Probation 
            Officer arm any deputy probation officer under his or her 
            jurisdiction."