BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1992
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 10, 2012

              ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER 
                                     PROTECTION
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                 AB 1992 (Huber) - As Introduced:  February 23, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   New Motor Vehicle Board: repeal.

           SUMMARY  :   Abolishes the New Motor Vehicle Board (NMVB) and its 
          duties and responsibilities on January 1, 2022.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the NMVB in the Department of Motor Vehicles 
            (DMV).

          2)Requires NMVB to collect fees for the administration of the 
            certification of third party dispute resolution processes for 
            new motor vehicles, as specified, resolve issues raised by 
            protests or petitions filed with the NMVB pursuant to an 
            appeal from a decision of the DMV, and, regulate franchises 
            subject to the Vehicle Code.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :

           Purpose of this bill  .  According to the author, "This measure 
          seeks to add a sunset date to the NMVB-Jan. 1, 2022, as written. 
           The goal is not to eliminate NMVB, but to put in place a 
          process by which its activities and goals may be periodically 
          examined.  This, in turn, can provide an impetus to policy 
          committees and affected parties to engage in a process that 
          could result in an updating of NMVB policies and procedures-or, 
          perhaps at some future date, if NMVB is deemed to no longer be 
          needed-to eliminate it.  The sunset process is a normal and 
          necessary part of government, to ensure the relevance and 
          appropriate function of government bodies and laws. 

          "California is a complex and dynamic state that needs support of 
          a responsive government.  It is imperative that entities no 
          longer of use to the people are removed from statute to ensure 
          that government is streamlined, efficient, and effective."









                                                                  AB 1992
                                                                  Page  2

           Background  .  The policy of establishing sunset dates is intended 
          to provide the Legislature an opportunity to conduct a regular 
          systematic performance review and evaluation of governmental 
          bodies, commonly referred to as the "Sunset Review" process.  
          Prompted by an impending sunset date, the Legislature may choose 
          to extend the sunset to a later date or instead terminate or 
          "sunset" the governmental body in question.  Regardless of 
          whether a governmental body has a sunset or not, the Legislature 
          may still conduct a review at any time.

          Each year, the Legislature enacts legislation extending sunset 
          dates and simultaneously making substantive policy changes.  
          This can be concerning if the Legislature and Administration are 
          unable to reach consensus related to the new policies prior to 
          the sunset date.  This most notably occurred regarding the 
          Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE).  The Governor 
          vetoed a bill both revising the functions of the BPPE and 
          extending its sunset and the BPPE became inoperative July of 
          2007, and remained inoperative, until early 2010.  The inability 
          to extend the sunset of the BPPE caused a significant lapse in 
          the regulation of private postsecondary education and a failure 
          to provide for the protection and interests of students and 
          institutions.  

          Similarly, the Governor vetoed a bill extending the sunset for 
          four boards (Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board, 
          Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, Board 
          of Barbering and Cosmetology, and the Dental Board of 
          California) in 2007 for reasons unrelated to the extension of 
          their respective sunset dates.  Legislation was enacted to 
          resurrect these boards six months after they were made 
          inoperative.  Likewise, in 2011, a bill to extend the sunset of 
          the Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) was vetoed by the 
          Governor.  BRN was reconstituted by way of budget trailer bill 
          legislation in February of 2012, two months after it was made 
          inoperative.

           NMVB  .  NMVB is a program within DMV with oversight provided by 
          Business, Transportation and Housing Agency. 

          Created in 1967 as the New Car Dealers Policy and Appeals Board, 
          NMVB's function was limited to hearing appeals from final 
          decisions of the Director of the DMV which were adverse to the 
          occupational license of a new motor vehicle dealer, 
          manufacturer, distributor, or representative. 








                                                                  AB 1992
                                                                  Page  3


          In 1973, the Legislature passed the California Automobile 
          Franchise Act giving NMVB its present name and creating a broad 
          statutory framework and forum for regulating and settling 
          disputes in the new vehicle industry.

          Within NMVB, there is a legal department which operates in a 
          quasi-judicial capacity to resolve disputes between franchised 
          dealers and manufacturers/distributors of new motor vehicles 
          (including motorcycles, and recreational vehicles).  There is 
          also a Consumer Mediation Services Program which attempts 
          through informal mediation to resolve disputes between consumers 
          and new motor vehicle dealers and/or manufacturers or 
          distributors.

           Opposition  .  The California New Car Dealers Association writes 
          in opposition, "The NMVB fulfills a crucial role. No dealer has 
          the wherewithal to stand on equal ground with multinational 
          automobile manufacturers in negotiating the terms of a franchise 
          relationship. Franchise laws, overseen by the NMVB, level this 
          playing field by allowing dealers to file a protest for a fair 
          hearing. The most important franchise laws are those that 
          provide dealers with a last line of defense against abusive 
          franchise activity. 

          "The NMVB is wholly supported by dealer/manufacturer fees. The 
          NMVB is one of the most cost-effective agencies in California 
          government. Paid for by manufacturer and dealer fees, the NMVB 
          reduces pressure on the judicial system to resolve industry 
          disputes.

          "The NMVB provides free consumer mediation.  California law 
          provides the NMVB with the ability to mediate consumer disputes 
          with dealers or manufacturers. This longstanding program has 
          very high settlement rates and has received positive reviews by 
          both consumers and dealers. This free program is an efficient 
          way to resolve disputes instead of resorting to costly 
          litigation."

           Double referred  . This bill is double-referred to Assembly 
          Transportation Committee.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 








                                                                 AB 1992
                                                                  Page  4

           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          B&B Cycles
          Barger Harley-Davidson
          Bellflower Motorsports
          California Motorcycle Dealers Association
          California New Car Dealers Association
          California Recreation vehicle Dealers Association
          Dudley Perkins Co.
          IRV Seaver Motorcycles
          Powersports of Vallejo
          Southbay Motorsports
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Rebecca May / B.,P. & C.P. / (916) 
          319-3301