BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1993
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 9, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     AB 1993 (Ma) - As Amended:  April 17, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              
          TransportationVote:8-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill restricts a peace officer's ability to impound the 
          vehicle driven by an unlicensed driver.  Specifically, this 
          bill:

          1)Prohibits a peace officer from towing and impounding a vehicle 
            driven by an unlicensed driver under either of the following 
            circumstances: 

             a)   The vehicle can be legally parked nearby and if the 
               unlicensed driver signed a document indemnifying the peace 
               officer and his or her employer from any harm or damage 
               that results from releasing the vehicle. 
             b)   The vehicle is turned over to a licensed driver who is 
               with the driver at the time of the stop or who can appear 
               at the scene within a reasonable amount of time.

          2)Requires the peace officer to inform the unlicensed driver, if 
            a licensed driver is not present, that the vehicle will not be 
            towed or impounded  if a licensed driver can retrieve the 
            vehicle within a reasonable amount of time.

          3)Provides discretion to the peace officer over whether to allow 
            a licensed driver who appears after a reasonable amount of 
            time to retrieve the vehicle and whether to assist the 
            unlicensed driver in contacting a licensed driver.

          4)Requires a licensed driver assuming control over a vehicle to 
            show proof of insurance.

          5)Requires a peace officer to obtain approval from a supervisory 








                                                                  AB 1993
                                                                  Page  2

            officer before towing and impounding a vehicle driven by a 
            person who has never been issued a driver's license and 
            requires the name of the supervisory officer to be included in 
            the incident report of the traffic stop.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Negligible direct state costs.

          2)Potential costs of an unknown amount, should local agencies 
            claim reimbursable costs with the Commission on State Mandates 
            and should the commission agree to those cost claims.  

            Generally, the bill provides discretion to peace officers.  It 
            seems unlikely the commission would grant claims for 
            reimbursement for local costs claimed as a result of local 
            discretionary actions.  However, the bill requires several 
            specific actions of peace officers involved in traffic stops, 
            such as requiring the peace officer to inform the unlicensed 
            driver, if a licensed driver is not present, that the vehicle 
            will not be towed or impounded if a licensed driver can 
            retrieve the vehicle within a reasonable amount of time, and 
            requiring supervisory officer approval before towing and 
            impounding certain vehicles.  While the costs of such 
            mandatory actions seem minor in isolation, applied statewide, 
            they may result in claims with the commission for state 
            reimbursement of a significant amount. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author intends this bill to result in more 
            reasonable treatment of those arrested for driving without a 
            license.  The author notes that vehicle impoundment for such 
            an offense is disproportional to the offense, which sometimes, 
            due to the cost of impoundment fees, results in abandonment of 
            the vehicle and falls frequently and heavily on undocumented 
            immigrants who cannot legally obtain a driver's licenses.  

           2)Background.   Many municipalities, presuming to act consistent 
            with state law, impound the vehicles of drivers who do not 
            possess a valid driver license.    However, recently, the 
            Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that law enforcement 
            cannot impound vehicles if the only offense is unlicensed 
            driving.  More recently, many municipalities have adopted 
            ordinances barring the practice in ways similar to the 








                                                                  AB 1993
                                                                  Page  3

            prohibition included in this bill.

           3)Support.   This bill is supported by the Immigrant Legal 
            Resource Center (sponsor) and other civil rights groups, who 
            contend 30-day impoundment for driving without a license is 
            inequitable to the offense and falls disproportionately on 
            undocumented immigrants.

           4)Opposition.   This bill is opposed by several major law 
            enforcement organizations and the League of California Cities, 
            who contend impounding the vehicle of an unlicensed driver is 
            appropriate and protective of public safety.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081