BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2095
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2095 (Campos)
          As Amended  August 20, 2012
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(April 23,2012) |SENATE: |38-0 |(August 22,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2012)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
                   (vote not relevant)

          Original Committee Reference:   ED  . 

           SUMMARY :  Provides, until January 1, 2014, an exception to 
          provisions of existing law that govern the placement of 
          destination signs on the state highway system.  

           The Senate amendments  delete the entire contents of the bill and 
          replace them with provisions related to directional highway 
          signs.  Specifically, these amendments authorize, until January 
          1, 2014, the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to place 
          and maintain destination signs to a culturally unique and 
          historically significant community if the county in which the 
          community exists requests the sign and the city within which the 
          community exists provides a letter indicating that the city is 
          not opposed to the placement of the signs; provides that any 
          sign placed in accordance with these provisions need not be 
          removed when the authority to place the sign is repealed on 
          January 1, 2014.  
           
          EXISTING LAW  :  Authorizes Caltrans to place and maintain signs 
          on state highways directing motorists to culturally unique 
          communities within a city or county if all the following 
          conditions are met:  

          1)The name of the community is culturally unique and 
            historically significant.  

          2)The name of the community has resulted from the influence of a 
            culture over a significant period of time.  

          3)The general public and media commonly recognize the name of 
            the community.  

          4)The community is located within a city, county, or city and 








                                                                  AB 2095
                                                                  Page  2

            county.  

          5)Signs are consistent with the signing requirements for the 
            state highway system.  

          6)The geographical boundary of the community is within three 
            miles of the state highway exit.  

          7)Trailblazing signs are installed on the appropriate streets or 
            roads prior to installation of signs on the state highway.  

          8)The city, county, or city and county provides funds from 
            non-state sources that cover all costs for Caltrans to place 
            and maintain, or cause to be placed and maintained, 
            appropriate signs on state highways.  

          9)The governing body of the city, county, or city and county in 
            which the community is located adopts a resolution that does 
            the following: 

             a)   Designates the name of the community that is to be used 
               on directional signs;  

             b)   Defines the geographical boundaries of the community; 
               and,  

             c)   Requests the department to post signs on state highways. 
                

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill dealt with entirely 
          unrelated issues involving the California Interscholastic 
          Federation.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Costs to Caltrans would be reimbursed from 
          non-state sources, as required by this bill.  

           COMMENTS  :  Existing law provides an administrative process 
          whereby Caltrans will place highway signs directing motorists to 
          culturally unique districts, if certain conditions are met.  
          Chief among those conditions is a requirement that the 
          respective city or county requests the sign.  

          According to the author, the City of San Jose is home to the 
          largest Vietnamese population outside of Vietnam and the 
          Vietnamese business district (known as the Little Saigon 








                                                                  AB 2095
                                                                  Page  3

          Business District) is a hub of economic activity and cultural 
          wealth.  

          Caltrans has been working with proponents of the "Little Saigon" 
          signs in San Jose and is reportedly ready to proceed with 
          placing the signs except that the City of San Jose has failed to 
          pass a resolution requesting the signs.  Without the City's 
          request, Caltrans has no authority to place the signs.  

          This bill would authorize a general exception to the existing 
          administrative process that would accommodate the situation in 
          San Jose wherein the County of Santa Clara has requested that 
          Caltrans place a "Little Saigon" sign and the City of San Jose 
          does not officially oppose the sign.  

          This bill has not been heard in its current form in any Assembly 
          policy committee.  
          

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 


                                                                FN: 0005335