BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 28, 2012

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
                                Sandre Swanson, Chair
                AB 2099 (Cedillo) - As Introduced:  February 23, 2012
          
          SUBJECT  :   Employment: wage, hour and working conditions 
          violations.

           SUMMARY  :   Increases the fine for specified wage and hour 
          violations from no less than $100 to no less than $250 and makes 
          non substantive technical change.   

           EXISTING LAW  states that every employer or other person acting 
          either individually or as an officer, agent, or employee of 
          another person is guilty of a misdemeanor and is, punishable by 
          a fine of not less than $100 or by imprisonment for not less 
          than 30 days, or by both, who does any of the following:

          1)Requires or causes any employee to work for longer hours than 
            those fixed, or under conditions of labor prohibited by an 
            order of the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC).

          2)Pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the 
            minimum fixed by an order of the IWC.

          3)Violates or refuses or neglects to comply with specified 
            provisions of the law or any order or ruling of the IWC.

           FISCAL EFFECT  : None

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author's office, current monetary 
          penalties serve as an inadequate disincentive for wage and hour 
          violations by employers.  Existing laws sets a fine of $100 for 
          employers who either require employees to work longer than fixed 
          hours, work under conditions prohibited by an order of the IWC, 
          pay employees less than minimum wage, or neglect to comply with 
          provisions of the Labor Code.  

          The author believes the fine was adequate when it was first 
          enacted, however it now needs to be raised to further 
          discouraging employers from engaging in these serious 
          violations.

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :








                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  2


          The California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (CRLAF) asserts 
          that violations are commonly committed by unscrupulous employers 
          operating in the Underground Economy and the current fine amount 
          is too low to deter even insignificant misconduct.  CRLAF 
          believes an increase in fines for these crimes is essential if 
          prosecutors are to have the tools they need to address the 
          massive scale of wage theft that is involved in some of these 
          cases.  A good example is found in the recent $2.2 million 
          dollar settlement of a CRLAF class action brought on behalf of 
          thousands of seasonal agricultural workers.  The employer and 
          labor contractor, acting as joint employers, were alleged to 
          have systematically cheated the workers of minimum wages and 
          overtime wages.  For the above-stated reasons they support the 
          bill.

           
          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :

          A broad coalition of employer groups states that the Labor Code 
          provision this bill seeks to amend, already imposes a statutory 
          penalty, despite the lack of any specific intent on behalf of 
          the employer or his/her agent to violate the law.  They also 
          state, that specifically, the penalty may be imposed simply on 
          the basis that the employer "neglected" to comply.  "Neglect" is 
          one of the lowest civil standards of liability to prove and 
          requires no evidence of actual intent to do harm.  Accordingly, 
          an employer who is trying to comply with California's wage and 
          hour laws, even seeks out direction from the Division of Labor 
          Standards Enforcement (DLSE) for advice on how to comply, may 
          still be subject to this statutory penalty if a court ultimately 
          determines the employer failed to comply with a duty under the 
          Labor Code or Wage Orders.  Finally, they believe that due to 
          the risk of liability and litigation under this existing 
          provision of the Labor Code, they are opposed to any increase in 
          the statutory penalty that may be imposed and there is no 
          evidence that a stronger deterrent is needed in the Labor Code 
          than those that already exist.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
          California Communities United Institute








                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  3

          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          State Building and Construction Trades Council of California

           Opposition 
           
          Air Conditioning Trade Association 
          Associated Builders and Contractors of California
          CalChamber
          California Association of Health Facilities
          California Farm Bureau Federation 
          California Framing Contractors Association 
          California Grocers Association 
          California Independent Grocers Association 
          California Lodging Industry Association
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association  
          Construction Employers' Association
          Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors Association of California 
          Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. 

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Lorie Alvarez / L. & E. / (916) 
          319-2091