BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2099 (Cedillo)
          As Introduced February 23, 2012
          Majority vote 

           LABOR & EMPLOYMENT         5-1                                  
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Swanson, Alejo, Allen,    |     |                          |
          |     |Furutani, Yamada          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Morrell                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Increases the fine for specified wage and hour 
          violations from not less than $100, to not less than $250 and 
          makes a non substantive technical change.   

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)States that every employer or other person acting either 
            individually or as an officer, agent, or employee of another 
            person is guilty of a misdemeanor and is, punishable by a fine 
            of not less than $100 or by imprisonment for not less than 30 
            days, or by both, who does any of the following:

             a)   Requires or causes any employee to work for longer hours 
               than those fixed, or under conditions of labor prohibited 
               by an order of the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC);

             b)   Pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less 
               than the minimum fixed by an order of the IWC; and,

             c)   Violates or refuses or neglects to comply with specified 
               provisions of the law or any order or ruling of the IWC.

          1)Provides for other fines and/or penalties for violations of 
            our state's labor laws.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, current monetary penalties 
          serve as an inadequate disincentive for wage and hour violations 








                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  2


          by employers.  Existing laws set a fine of $100 for employers 
          who either require employees to work longer than fixed hours, 
          work under conditions prohibited by an order of the IWC, pay 
          employees less than minimum wage, or neglect to comply with 
          provisions of the Labor Code.  

          The author believes the fine was adequate when it was first 
          enacted, however it now needs to be raised to further discourage 
          employers from engaging in these serious violations.

          Arguments in support:  The California Rural Legal Assistance 
          Foundation (CRLAF) asserts that violations are commonly 
          committed by unscrupulous employers operating in the underground 
          economy and the current fine amount is too low to deter even 
          insignificant misconduct.  CRLAF believes an increase in fines 
          for these crimes is essential if prosecutors are to have the 
          tools they need to address the massive scale of wage theft that 
          is involved in some of these cases.  A good example is found in 
          the recent $2.2 million settlement of a CRLAF class action 
          lawsuit brought on behalf of thousands of seasonal agricultural 
          workers.  The employer and labor contractor, acting as joint 
          employers, were alleged to have systematically cheated the 
          workers of minimum wages and overtime wages.  For the 
          above-stated reasons they support the bill.
           
           Arguments in opposition:  A broad coalition of employer groups 
          states that the Labor Code provision this bill seeks to amend, 
          already imposes a statutory penalty, despite the lack of any 
          specific intent on behalf of the employer or his or her agent to 
          violate the law.  They also state, that specifically, the 
          penalty may be imposed simply on the basis that the employer 
          "neglected" to comply.  "Neglect" is one of the lowest civil 
          standards of liability to prove and requires no evidence of 
          actual intent to do harm.  Accordingly, an employer who is 
          trying to comply with California's wage and hour laws, even 
          seeks out direction from the Division of Labor Standards 
          Enforcement for advice on how to comply, may still be subject to 
          this statutory penalty if a court ultimately determines the 
          employer failed to comply with a duty under the Labor Code or 
          Wage Orders.  Finally, they believe that due to the risk of 
          liability and litigation under this existing provision of the 
          Labor Code, they are opposed to any increase in the statutory 
          penalty that may be imposed and there is no evidence that a 
          stronger deterrent is needed in the Labor Code than those that 








                                                                  AB 2099
                                                                  Page  3


          already exist.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Lorie Alvarez / L. & E. / (916) 
          319-2091 


                                                                FN: 0003211