BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 16, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                    AB 2113 (Hueso) - As Amended:  March 29, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :  Enhanced driver's licenses

           SUMMARY  :  Allows the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to issue 
          enhanced driver's licenses (EDLs) that are acceptable at border 
          crossings as proof of identity and citizenship.  Specifically, 
           this bill  :  

          1)Makes findings and declarations regarding traffic congestion 
            at California/Mexico border crossings and the federal 
            government's endorsement of EDLs that allow for far faster 
            processing of border crossers.  

          2)Allows DMV to enter into a memorandum of understanding with a 
            federal agency for the purposes of obtaining approval for the 
            issuance of an EDL, instruction permit, provisional license, 
            or identification (ID) card (all of these instruments, other 
            than EDLs, are hereafter referred to as "related documents") 
            that is acceptable as proof of identity and citizenship 
            pursuant to the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI).  

          3)Allows DMV, upon the request of an applicant, to issue an 
            initial EDL or related document, or renew any of these 
            documents, for a person who is 16 years of age or older and is 
            a resident of both California and the United States.  

          4)Requires the applicant to: submit sufficient proof that meets 
            the requirements of the WHTI to establish his or her identity, 
            residency, and citizenship; certify, under the penalty of 
            perjury, that the information he or she has submitted is true 
            and correct to the best of his or her knowledge; and sign a 
            declaration acknowledging his or her understanding of radio 
            frequency identification (RFID) technology.  

          5)Requires DMV to include in the EDL or related document 
            reasonable security measures to protect against unauthorized 
            disclosure of personal information regarding the person who is 
            the subject of the document.  

          6)Requires the EDL or related document to include RFID 








                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  2

            technology that will signal a secure system to pull up the 
            person's biographic and biometric data for the cross border 
            patrol and a machine readable zone or barcode that can be 
            electronically read by the cross border patrol.  

          7)Allows an EDL be suspended, revoked, or restricted as are 
            other driver's licenses under existing law.  

          8)Requires an applicant applying for an initial EDL or related 
            document to have his or her facial image and signature 
            captured or reproduced by DMV at the time of application or 
            renewal.  

          9)Allows the facial image and signature to be available to 
            federal, state, or local government agencies for law 
            enforcement purposes authorized by law, as well as to other 
            states to the extent authorized by federal law, to DMV for 
            purposes authorized by law, and to any other entities, if the 
            person provides written authorization for the release of his 
            or her facial image or signature.  

          10)Prohibits DMV from disclosing the person's facial image or 
            signature, or copies of a digital image of any document 
            required for obtaining an EDL or related document, other than 
            as described above.  

          11)Requires DMV to examine and verify the genuineness, 
            regularity, and legality of an application and proof submitted 
            for an initial or renewal of an EDL or related document.  

          12)Allows DMV to require the submission of additional 
            information to establish identity, residency, and citizenship. 
             

          13)Requires DMV to deny an application or renewal of an EDL or 
            related document if it is not satisfied with the genuineness, 
            regularity, and legality of the application or supporting 
            documentation or the truth of any statement contained in the 
            application or supporting documentation, or for any other 
            reason authorized by law.  

          14)Allows an applicant to appeal DMV's denial of an application 
            for the issuance or renewal of an EDL or related document.  

          15)Requires DMV to retain copies or digital images of documents 








                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  3

            provided by applicants for EDLs and related documents.  

          16)Requires DMV, after denying an application for an EDL or 
            related document, to retain the facial image of the applicant 
            and the reason for denial for not less than one year, unless 
            fraud is suspected, in which case the applicant's facial image 
            and the reason for denial must be retained for not less than 
            10 years.  

          17)Exempts the facial image, signature, copies, and digital 
            image of documents required for EDLs and related documents 
            from public disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act.  

          18)Prohibits, except as required by federal law, information 
            submitted by an applicant for an EDL or related document from 
            being disclosed to a foreign nation.  

          19)Requires an applicant for initial issuance or renewal of an 
            EDL or related document to submit an additional nonrefundable 
            application fee of $75 with his or application in addition to 
            fees normally required for a driver's license or ID card.  

          20)Requires these additional fees to be deposited into the 
            Enhanced Driver's License and Identification Card Subaccount, 
            which this bill establishes in the Motor Vehicle Account. 

          21)Requires moneys in the Subaccount, upon appropriation, to be 
            expended by DMV to implement this EDL program.  

          22)Requires moneys in the Subaccount, including any interest 
            accrued, to remain in the Subaccount at the end of each fiscal 
            year.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  Establishes procedures for the issuance of 
          driver's licenses, instruction permits, and ID cards but makes 
          no provision for any of these documents to meet the WHTI 
          standards that would allow them to be used as proof of identity 
          and citizenship under a federal program.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The author reports that he is carrying this bill as a 
          result of information he gathered in chairing hearings of the 
          Select Committee on California-Mexico Bi-national Affairs. "The 
          information provided at the hearings has significantly raised 








                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  4

          awareness of the impact border wait times have on our state's 
          economy."  The intent of this bill is to reduce travel and 
          processing times and strengthen security at border crossings as 
          a means of stimulating cross-border business activities.  

          According to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an 
          EDL is "the standard document issued by a state or (Canadian) 
          province that has been enhanced in process, technology and 
          security to denote identity and citizenship for purposes of 
          entering into the United States at the land and sea port of 
          entry."  The CBP goes on to explain, "When the EDL is presented 
          by a United States of Canadian citizen traveler, no other 
          documentation is required for purposes of proving identity and 
          citizenship."  

          An EDL may be used in "Ready Lanes," which are vehicle lanes 
          operated by the CBP at border crossings exclusively for 
          travelers who possess RFID-enabled travel documents (which may 
          also include U.S. passport cards and so-called "trusted travel 
          documents").  These documents allow information contained in a 
          wireless device or "tag" to be read from a distance at Ready 
          Lanes, similar to those contained in car keys and employee 
          identifications.  This technology eliminates the need to key-in 
          traveler information and translates into 60% faster processing 
          than manual queries.  

          The genesis of the EDL was the need for heightened security 
          measures after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.  Congress passed the 
          Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 
          (IRTPA), requiring U.S. and Canadian travelers to present a 
          passport or other document that denotes identity and citizenship 
          when entering the U.S.   The WHTI went into effect on June 1, 
          2009 for land and sea travel into the U.S.  The goal of WHTI is 
          to facilitate entry for U.S. citizens and legitimate foreign 
          visitors, while increasing U.S. border security.  The states of 
          Washington, New York, Michigan and Vermont as well as four 
          Canadian provinces have all successfully implemented EDLs.  

          According to the author, "Each year, 45 million vehicle 
          passengers and 15 million pedestrians cross the border into 
          California from the six ports of entry -- San Ysidro, Otay Mesa, 
          Tecate, Calexico, Calexico East and Andrade.  In San Ysidro, the 
          busiest port of entry in the world, an astounding 50,000 
          vehicles and 25,000 pedestrians are processed into the U.S. each 
          day.  At today's average wait time of 70 minutes, more than 8 








                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  5

          million trips are lost due to congestion.  This is a loss of 
          nearly $1.3 billion in revenues, three million potential working 
          hours, 35,000 jobs and $42 million in wages annually in the San 
          Diego region alone.  There is an urgent economic need to 
          responsibly expedite the movement of people across the 
          California-Mexico border.   EDL's will help decrease border wait 
          times by at least 30 minutes and encourage people to travel from 
          Mexico into California using CBP's Ready Lanes.  As more 
          travelers obtain RFID-enabled travel documents, CBP converts 
          more vehicle lanes into Ready Lanes.  California's economy will 
          be the primary beneficiary of this expedited travel."  

          RFID is a controversial technology that tends to raise privacy 
          concerns.  The American Civil Liberties Union, for instance, 
          worries that creating a database of biometric images "could pose 
          a threat to anonymity and anonymous speech as well as lead to 
          surveillance by government and private entities, as surveillance 
          cameras become more ubiquitous."  The Consumer Federation of 
          California adds, "This technology has been widely criticized, 
          including in Washington State, where security researchers 
          analyzed EDLs and found security lacking."    

          In response to those concerns, the CBP states that it "believes 
          that the practices, processes, and procedures we institute at 
          the border mitigate the risks of cloning, skimming, and 
          'killing' RFID tags embedded in documents."  CBP further points 
          out that, "There is no personally identifiable information on 
          the RFID tags.  The tag is simply a unique reference number that 
          links to a secure law enforcement database where information is 
          stored?RFID technology has been commercially available in one 
          form or another since the 1970s.  It is now part of our daily 
          lives and can be found in car keys, employee identification, 
          medical history/billing, highway toll tags, and security access 
          cards?In utilizing vicinity RFID technology, DHS adheres to 
          stringent requirements for safeguarding personal data.  No 
          personal information is stored on the card - only a reference 
          number, which points to the information housed in secure 
          databases."  Additionally, it should be noted that the use of 
          EDLs is entirely voluntary and the bill explicitly requires 
          applicants to sign a declaration acknowledging their 
          understanding of RFID technology.  

          One other possible (if misplaced) concern is that this bill 
          would somehow provide a backdoor means of providing undocumented 
          immigrants residing in California access to identity documents 








                                                                  AB 2113
                                                                  Page  6

          that can be used to facilitate their remaining in this country.  
          The bill, as well as the federal program it seeks to implement, 
          in fact restricts the issuance of EDLs to persons who are U.S. 
          citizens, a more rigorous requirement than is applied to 
          applicants for standard California driver's licenses.  
          
           Double Referral  :  This bill is also referred to the Assembly 
          Judiciary Committee.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Chamber of Commerce
          Councilmember David Alvarez, City of San Diego
          Governor, State of Baja California
          Imperial County Transportation Commission
          Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce 
          San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce
          San Ysidro Smart Border Coalition
          Secretary of Tourism, State of Baja California
          Smart Border Coalition

           Opposition 
           
          American Civil Liberties Union
          Consumer Federation of California
          Electronic Frontier Foundation
          Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Howard Posner / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093