BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS
                              LOU CORREA, CHAIRMAN
                                             


          Bill No:        AB 2133
          Author:         Blumenfield and Silva
          Version:        As amended April 26, 2012
          Hearing Date:   June 12, 2012
          Fiscal:         Yes
          Consultant:     Donald E. Wilson




                                 SUBJECT OF BILL  
          
          Veterans' priority registration  
           
                                   PROPOSED LAW  
           
           Give California resident student veterans 15 years of 
          priority registration for enrollment. 
           

                          EXISTING LAW AND BACKGROUND  
          
          1.  Existing law gives four years of priority registration 
          to student veterans.

          2.  Declares legislative intent regarding the categories of 
          priorities for purposes of enrollment planning and 
          admission at UC and CSU (described below) with one          
           exception:  CSU must admit with junior status any CCC 
          student meeting the associate degree for transfer 
          requirements, who will receive priority over other CCC 
          transfers Education Code �66747 established by SB 1440 
          (Padilla), Chapter 428, Statutes of 2010.  

          3.  Declares the Legislature's intent regarding the 
          categories of priority for purposes of undergraduate 
          resident student enrollment planning and admission at UC 
          and CSU, in the following order (Education Code � 66201): 

                       a)   Continuing undergraduate students in good 
          standing.










                       b)   CCC students who have successfully 
          completed a course of study in an approved transfer 
          agreement program.

                       c)   Other CCC students who have met all 
          requirements for transfer.

                       d)   Other qualified transfer students.

                       e)   California residents entering at the 
          freshman or sophomore levels.

          4.  Declares the Legislature's intent that within each of 
          the preceding categories, priority consideration for 
          admission be granted in the following order:

                       a)   California residents who are recently 
          released veterans of the Armed Forces, with priority within 
          this group to be given to veterans who were enrolled in 
          good standing prior to military service.

                       b)   CCC transfers, giving preference to 
          students from historically underrepresented or economically 
          disadvantaged families to the fullest extent possible in 
          transfer admissions decisions.

                       c)   Previously enrolled applicants provided 
          they left the campus in good standing.

                       d)   Applicants for a degree or credential 
          objective not generally offered at other public higher 
          education institutions in California.

                       e)   Applicants for whom the distance to 
          attend another institution would create financial or other 
          hardship. 

          5.  Requires UC and CSU maintain a student body comprised 
          of 60% upper division and 40% lower division students and 
          declares the Legislature's intent that this goal be reached 
          and maintained by instituting programs and policies that 
          increase the number of transfer students, rather than by 
          denying places to eligible freshmen applicants. (Education 

                                      Page 2









          Code � 66201.5) 

          6. Requires CCC and CSU, and requests UC, to give priority 
          for registration for enrollment to any member or former 
          member of the Armed Services for any academic term attended 
          at one of these institutions within two years of leaving 
          active duty, if the institution already administers a 
          priority enrollment system Education Code � 66025.8, 
          established by SB 272 (Runner), Chapter 356, Statutes of 
          2007].

          7.  SB 272 of 2007 (Runner) gave veterans priority 
          registration for two years.

          8.  SB 813 of 2011 (Senate Veterans Affairs Committee) 
          extended priority registration to four years.


                                         
                                    COMMENT  
          
          1.  AB 549 of 2011 (Harkey) and SB 813 of 2011 (Senate 
          Veterans Affairs) both sought to increase priority 
          registration to five years, which was amended to four years 
          in SB 813, which the governor signed.

          2.  The priority registration clock starts ticking from the 
          moment of discharge.  The extension of priority 
          registration was necessitated after it was found that SB 
          272 of 2007 (Runner) did not give a long enough 
          registration window since many veterans did not enroll in 
          school immediately upon discharge.

          The example given in a committee analysis for SB 813 of 
          2011 clearly illustrated the answer to the question, why 
          four years instead of two? 

          E.g. - A veteran separates from service say in February 
          2011, gets home, looks for job, and applies for acceptance 
          to a university in April.  This year admission is already 
          closed for the fall semester at some universities.  So, 
          this veteran will not be admitted to school for a year 
          after separating from the military.  One of the two 
          priority years is already consumed and the veteran is not 

                                      Page 3









          even attending school."

          3.  Now the question is why 15 years instead of four?

          Committee staff met with some community colleges last fall. 
           The problem is not that 15 years of priority registration 
          is needed, but that a veteran has 15 years under the new 
          G.I. Bill to attend classes.

          E.g. - A veteran waits ten years to attend college after 
          discharge.  He or she now has no priority registration and 
          has problems getting impacted classes, which may mean the 
          veteran does not finish within the four years of G.I. Bill 
          benefits.

          The problem this bill seeks to solve is to make sure that 
          when a veteran goes to school, he or she is able to finish 
          within four years of G.I. Bill benefits.  The answer to the 
          problem is to change when the clock starts ticking.  

          The legislature did not see fit to give 5 years of priority 
          registration much less 15.  Since the intent of the bill is 
          to make sure any veteran finishes within the benefits 
          period, then keep the law at four years of priority 
          registration but have the clock start ticking from the time 
          of enrollment instead of at the time of discharge.

          In discussions with the community college group, they 
          indicated the idea was good, but they did not have the 
          software available to implement the change in that manner.

          RECOMMENDATION - Change the bill from 15 years of priority 
          enrollment to four years of priority enrollment beginning 
          from the day a veteran starts classes.

          4.  There has been some discussion with California State 
          University to add some clarifying language that priority is 
          only granted after verification of veteran status.  E.g. - 
          "and after military or veterans status has been verified by 
          the institution."

          5.  Legislative Counsel advises that this bill is in 
          conflict with AB 649 (Harkey) and AB 1832 (Silva).
                                         

                                      Page 4











                                    SUPPORT  
          
          American Legion, Department of California
          AMVETS, Department of California
          California Association of County Veteran Service Officers
          California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office
          California State Commanders Veterans Council
          Community College League of California
          Coast Colleges
          National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
          North Orange County Community College District
          Orange County Community Colleges Legislative Task Force
          Rancho Santiago Community College District
          South Orange County Community College District
          Vietnam Veterans of America, California State Council


                                      OPPOSE  
          
          None received






















                                      Page 5