BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2168
                                                                  Page 1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2168 (Chesbro and Dickinson)
          As Amended  May 15, 2012
          Majority vote 

           NATURAL RESOURCES   7-0         APPROPRIATIONS      12-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chesbro, Knight,          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |
          |     |Brownley, Dickinson,      |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |Huffman, Monning, Skinner |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
          |     |                          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Department of Forestry and 
          Fire Protection (CalFire) to coordinate with a Timber Harvest 
          Plan's (THP) interdisciplinary review team to ensure that all 
          necessary members of the team are present at the preharvest 
          inspection, if such an inspection is needed.  Specifically,  this 
          bill  :

          1)Requires CalFire to coordinate with a THP interdisciplinary 
            review team to ensure that all necessary members of the team 
            that request participation in a preharvest inspection are 
            present for the inspection, if one is needed.

          2)Requires a review team member who requests participation in a 
            preharvest inspection to make a good faith effort to 
            participate in the scheduled inspection.

          3)Allows CalFire to schedule an additional onsite visit to 
            complete the preharvest inspection if there are compelling 
            reasons why a member of the review team could not attend the 
            first scheduled inspection, and the director articulates those 
            reasons in writing to the person who submitted the plan.

           EXISTING LAW  :  Pursuant to the Z'Berg-Nejedly Forest Practice 
          Act of 1973:

          1)Prohibits any person from conducting timber operations unless 
            a THP has been prepared by a registered professional forester 
            and approved by CalFire.  Generally, a THP must contain a 








                                                                  AB 2168
                                                                  Page 2


            description of the location of the planned harvest, the 
            harvest method, measures to avoid excessive erosion, timeframe 
            of operations, and other information required by forest 
            practice rules adopted by the Board of Forestry.

          2)Limits the effective period of a THP to three years.  A THP 
            under which work has commenced but not completed is eligible 
            for two one-year extensions if "cause" is shown and all timber 
            operations comply with the THP and all applicable rules and 
            regulations.  A notice of extension must be provided to 
            CalFire no sooner than 30 days but at least 10 days prior to 
            the expiration of a THP.

          3)Requires CalFire to establish interdisciplinary review teams 
            to review THPs to assist in the evaluation of the plans and 
            their impacts on the environment.  In general, each review 
            team, when possible, shall consist of a representative from 
            the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control 
            Board, Department of Fish and Game, Department of 
            Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, a representative 
            of county government when the county government so requests, 
            California Coastal Commission (for plans in the coastal zone), 
            California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (for plans in the 
            Tahoe Basin), and the Department of Forestry and Fire 
            Protection.  Other members of the review team may include 
            representatives from the Department of Parks and Recreation, 
            Native American tribes, and federal, state, and county 
            agencies.

          4)Requires an interdisciplinary review teams to review a THP 
            before CalFire makes a determination on the plan.  The review 
            team assists CalFire in determining whether a preharvest 
            inspection is needed and, if so, what areas of concern are to 
            be examined during inspection.  If a preharvest inspection is 
            needed, CalFire has 30 days from the date the inspection is 
            completed to review the plan and take public comment.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, minor, absorbable costs to CalFire, which might need 
          to engage in a small amount of communication by telephone or 
          email.

           COMMENTS  :  There is currently a timber harvest working group 
          chaired by Assemblyman Chesbro and Assemblyman Dickinson that 








                                                                  AB 2168
                                                                  Page 3


          consists of several stake holders from the Legislature, 
          Administration, timber industry, and the environmental 
          community.  The mission statement of this group is to develop 
          reforms to the timber harvest regulatory program so the cost of 
          the program:  1) is reasonable for the state, landowners, and 
          timber industry, 2) establishes adequate funding for an 
          efficient state regulatory program that meets the requirements 
          of the Forest Practice Act, the California Environmental Quality 
          Act, the California and federal Endangered Species Act, and 
          other applicable environmental laws, and 3) does not lead to 
          unintended consequences of accelerated forest land conversion 
          and job loss.

          During the initial meetings of the timber harvest working group, 
          timber operators highlighted the inefficiencies with the 
          preharvest inspection process.  Specifically, the 
          interdisciplinary review teams are not required to ensure that 
          the agencies interested in the inspection coordinate their field 
          visits with each other.  As such, timber operators are often 
          faced with having to accommodate different review team members 
          on different days to review the same THP.  This inefficient 
          process can cost the timber operator additional time and money, 
          extend the plan review period, and ultimately delay the 
          commencement of timber operations.  This bill requires CalFire 
          to coordinate with the review team to ensure that all necessary 
          members of the team are present for the preharvest inspection if 
          an inspection is needed.

          This bill is consistent with the working group's mission by 
          helping to eliminate unreasonable costs to land owners and the 
          timber industry without further compromising the required 
          environmental review.

          The timber harvest working group continues to meet to discuss 
          timber harvest reform.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Mario DeBernardo / NAT. RES. / (916) 
          319-2092 


                                                                FN: 0003651










                                                                 AB 2168
                                                                  Page 4