BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2193|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2193
          Author:   Lara (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/21/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 6/27/12
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Alquist, Blakeslee, Huff, Liu, Price, 
            Simitian, Vargas
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Hancock, Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 8/16/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Dutton, Lieu, Price, 
            Steinberg
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  68-10, 5/30/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Long-term English learners

           SOURCE  :     Californians Together


           DIGEST  :    This bill defines long-term English learner and 
          English learner at-risk of becoming a long-term English 
          learner and requires the Department of Education (CDE) to 
          annually ascertain and provide to school districts and 
          schools the number of pupils in each school district and 
          school, as specified, who are, or are at risk of becoming, 
          long-term English learners.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law defines "English learner" as a 
          child who does not speak English or whose native language 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2193
                                                                Page 
          2

          is not English and who is not currently able to perform 
          ordinary classroom work in English.  (Education Code (ED) 
          Section 306)

          Both federal and state law require that each school 
          district with English language learners annually assess 
          these students' English language development until they are 
          redesignated as English proficient.  (ED Section 313)

          Under No Child Left Behind, the CDE and each local 
          educational agency (LEA) must identify any school that has 
          not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for at least two 
          years as in Program Improvement (PI).  Schools that remain 
          in Program Improvement are subject to increasing 
          requirements and sanctions. 

          Existing law further requires that the CDE develop a 
          statewide system of school support to provide for intensive 
          and sustained support and technical assistance for school 
          districts, county offices of education, and schools in need 
          of improvement.  Existing law requires that the system of 
          support consist of regional consortia, as well as district 
          assistance and intervention teams, and other technical 
          assistance providers.  Regional consortia are required to 
          work collaboratively with school districts and program 
          improvement schools to (1) review and analyze all facets of 
          the school's operation; (2) assist the LEA or school in 
          developing recommendations for improving pupil performance 
          and school operations; and (3) assist the LEA or school in 
          efforts to eliminate misassignments of personnel.  (ED 
          Section 52059)

          This bill defines "long-term English learner" and "English 
          learner at-risk of becoming a long-term English learner" 
          and requires CDE to annually ascertain and provide to 
          school districts and schools the number of pupils in each 
          school district and school, as specified, who are, or are 
          at risk of becoming, long-term English learners.

           Comments
           
          A recent report by Californians Together, Reparable Harm: 
          Fulfilling the Unkept Promise of Educational Opportunity 
          for California's Long-Term English Learners, presented 







                                                               AB 2193
                                                                Page 
          3

          survey data collected from 40 school districts.  Major 
          findings of the survey included the following:

           The majority (59%) of secondary school English learners 
            are "Long Term English Learners" (defined as being in 
            U.S. schools for more than six years without sufficient 
            English proficiency to be reclassified).

           California school districts that do not have a shared 
            definition of Long-term English learners.

           Several contributing factors include; no receipt of 
            language development programs, being given elementary 
            school curricula and materials that were not designed to 
            meet EL needs, weak language development program models, 
            inconsistent programs, social and linguistic isolation 
            and other things.

           Few districts have designated programs or formal 
            approaches designed for Long Term English Learners. 

           English learners  .  The CDE provides the following 
          information on English learners in California's public 
          schools:

           In the 2010-11 school year, there were approximately 1.4 
            million ELs in California public schools, constituting 
            23.2% of the total enrollment.

           Seventy-one percent of English learners are enrolled in 
            the elementary grades (K-6) with the remaining 29% 
            enrolled in grades 7-12.  

           Although English learner data are collected for 59 
            language groups, 94% speak one of the top 10 languages in 
            the state, which include Spanish (82.7%), Vietnamese, 
            Cantonese, Pilipino (Filipino or Tagalog), Hmong, 
            Mandarin, Korean, Arabic, Punjabi, and Russian.

           During 2010-2011, the CDE administered the California 
            English Language Development Test (CELDT) to 1.57 million 
            students, 1.25 million of whom were tested under the 
            annual assessment window. 








                                                               AB 2193
                                                                Page 
          4

           Since 2008-09, approximately 11% of ELs have annually 
            been reclassified as English proficient. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

            Data collection and hosting  .  Approximately $50,000 for 
            .5 PY to compile specified data for each school district. 
            See staff comments.

            Local assistance  .  $100,000 - $200,000 to support the 
            expanded role of regional consortia required by this 
            bill.

            Mandates  .  Potentially substantial reimbursable mandate 
            on school districts to expand regional consortia duties 
            and parental notifications.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/27/12) (per Senate Education 
          Committee analysis - unable to reverify at time of writing)

          Californians Together (source)
          Association of California School Administrators
          California Association for Bilingual Education
          California Association of Latino Superintendents and 
          Administrators
          California Federation of Teachers
          California School Boards Association
          California Teachers Association
          California Teachers of English to Speakers of Other 
          Languages
          Families in Schools
          San Francisco Unified School District

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, a 
          mechanism does not currently exist to identify Long-term 
          English learners or those at risk of becoming such.  Absent 
          a mechanism, school districts and parents find it difficult 
          to provide appropriate and timely interventions to prevent 
          an EL from becoming an LTEL.  This bill begins the process 
          of identifying "long-term English learners to ensure that 
          they do not become 'invisible'" and do no fall through the 







                                                               AB 2193
                                                                Page 
          5

          cracks regarding instruction.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  68-10, 5/30/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Garrick, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, 
            Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, 
            Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, 
            Monning, Nestande, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel 
            P�rez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, 
            Swanson, Torres, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, 
            Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Morrell, Nielsen
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fletcher, Valadao


          PQ:m  8/21/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****