BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2200
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 23, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                      AB 2200 (Ma) - As Amended:  April 18, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :  High-occupancy vehicle lanes:  Interstate 80

           SUMMARY :  Suspends the operation of high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) 
          lanes in the Interstate 80 corridor within the jurisdiction of 
          the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) during the 
          reverse commute direction, as defined.  Specifically,  this bill  : 
           

          1)Suspends operation of the HOV lanes on this particular 
            corridor during this particular period, so long as doing so is 
            consistent with the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 
            San Francisco Bay Area and with other federal requirements.  

          2)Defines "reverse commute direction" to mean eastbound on 
            Interstate 80 between the hours of 5 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 
            westbound on Interstate 80 between the hours of 3 p.m. and 7 
            p.m.  

          3)Makes findings and declarations regarding the unique nature of 
            the Interstate 80 corridor in the San Francisco Bay area.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Authorizes the California Department of Transportation 
            (Caltrans) and local authorities, with respect to highways 
            under their respective jurisdictions, to permit preferential 
            use of highway lanes for HOVs, under specific conditions.  

          2)Requires Caltrans, or the appropriate local entity, to produce 
            engineering reports that estimate the effect of an HOV lane 
            prior to establishing the lane.  The reports must evaluate the 
            proposals for safety, congestion, and highway capacity.  

          3)Vests, under federal law, state departments of transportation 
            with responsibility for establishing occupancy requirements 
            for vehicles using HOV lanes, except that the requirement can 
            be no less than two occupants.  

          4)Under the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, requires 








                                                                  AB 2200
                                                                  Page  2

            states that do not meet federal standards for carbon monoxide 
            and ozone to develop SIPs.  

          5)Also requires, under federal law, SIPs to result in emission 
            reductions to federal standards and to conform with regional 
            transportation plans;  

          6)Authorizes federal sanctions for a state's failure to conform 
            to SIP requirements; sanctions include withholding approval 
            for federal highway projects.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The primary purpose of an HOV lane is to increase the 
          total number of people moved through a congested corridor by 
          offering two kinds of incentives: a savings in travel time and a 
          reliable and predictable travel time.  Because HOV lanes carry 
          vehicles with a higher number of occupants, they may move 
          significantly more people during congested periods, even when 
          the number of vehicles that use the HOV lane is lower than on 
          the adjoining general-purpose lanes.  In general, carpoolers, 
          vanpoolers, and transit users are the primary beneficiaries of 
          HOV lanes.  

          HOV lanes work best where significant roadway congestion during 
          the peak periods occurs.   Experience with HOV lanes from around 
          the country has shown a positive relationship between ridership 
          and travel time savings, suggesting that, as congestion grows, 
          the travelers' willingness to carpool or ride on a bus that uses 
          an HOV lane also grows.  

          In the Bay Area, HOV lane occupancy requirements are 2+ except 
          on parts of the system that feed into the San Francisco-Oakland 
          Bay Bridge, Carquinez Bridge, and the Benicia-Martinez Bridge, 
          which have HOV occupancy requirements of 3+.  While federal law 
          vests states with the authority to set the minimum HOV occupancy 
          requirements, in practice this decision is made in the Bay Area 
          jointly by Caltrans, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 
          and MTC.  

          HOV lanes in the Bay Area are operated contiguous with general 
          purpose lanes and have continuous unlimited access into and out 
          of the lane, with no buffer (neither physical nor striped) 
          separating them from the adjacent lanes.  The lane restrictions 
          are in effect only during weekday commute periods (e.g. 5-9 a.m. 








                                                                  AB 2200
                                                                  Page  3

          and 3-7 p.m.). During off-peak periods and on weekends, the 
          lanes are open to all traffic.  Typically, HOV lanes work at 
          their optimum when the vehicular volume is approximately 1650 
          vehicles per hour.  (In contrast, mixed flow lanes are generally 
          expected optimally to carry between 1,800 and 2,000 vehicles per 
          hour.)  

          This bill suspends operation of the HOV lanes in Interstate 80 
          between the Carquinez Bridge and the San Francisco-Oakland Bay 
          Bridge during the reverse commute direction.  The author asserts 
          that HOV lanes in this corridor are not fully utilized at all 
          times.  She cites as evidence recent HOV volume reports 
          demonstrating that while the HOV lanes may be at or near 
          capacity in the morning (approximately 1750 vehicles per hour), 
          only 200 vehicles per hour used the HOV lane in the reverse 
          commute direction.  

           Proposed amendments:   MTC is pursuing an ambitious plan to 
          develop a region-wide HOT lane network throughout the San 
          Francisco Bay Area, including Interstate 80 within its 
          jurisdiction.  The author has agreed to amend the bill to add a 
          January 1, 2020, sunset date to ensure that the proposed HOT 
          lane is not impacted by suspending operation of the HOV lanes.   
           
           Previous legislation:   AB 2132 (Sher), Chapter 940, Statues of 
          1991, authorized Caltrans to establish HOV lanes on the new 
          Dumbarton and San Mateo bridges and the bridge approaches and 
          established the occupancy requirements for those HOV lanes at 
          2+.  (These provisions were later repealed by SB 916 (Perata), 
          Chapter 716, Statutes of 2003.)  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :  

           Support  
           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 










                                                                  AB 2200
                                                                 Page  4