BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2209
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 2, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2209 (Hueso) - As Amended: April 23, 2012
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10
- 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill prohibits the placement of a dependent child outside
of the United States with any person who is not a parent, absent
a judicial finding that the placement, by clear and convincing
evidence, is in the best interest of the child.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)One-time costs, likely less than $50,000 (GF), for the
Department of Social Services to develop policies and
regulations regarding the placement of children outside of the
country.
2)The placement outside of children outside of the country is a
fairly rare occurrence, according to the Judicial Counsel,
therefore costs to both the courts and child welfare
departments should be minor and absorbable within existing
resources.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . The intent of this bill is to limit instances when a
dependent child, who is not being placed in his or her
parent's custody, may be placed outside of the country.
According to the author, social service and welfare agencies
often make recommendations to the court to place a dependent
child for long-term care or adoption outside of the country.
This is particularly true in cities near border areas. Once a
child is placed out of the country, the court and law
enforcement lose their ability to protect the child if he or
she needs assistance. The author argues that a child who is a
AB 2209
Page 2
dependent of the state should not be placed outside of the
United States unless doing so is in the child's best interest.
Currently, the law does not expressly allow nor prohibit the
placement of a child out of the country. This bill
establishes a legal burden of proof for placing agencies to
meet, with a list of factors they must consider, before making
such a recommendation to the court. AB 2209 establishes a
statewide standard designed to ensure consideration is given
to factors, such as whether the health or educational needs of
the child will be met in the country in which the agency is
considering placing the child.
2)Support . Children's Advocacy Institute notes, "This heightened
standard is important because placement outside of the country
deprives courts of the power to monitor these children, the
care they receive, and their overall well-being. A child's
safety and well-being are paramount. As the acting parent of
foster youth, California must do everything it can to protect
children. AB 2209 supplies the courts with appropriate
standards to protect the best interests of children placed
outside of the country."
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081