BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2250
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 27, 2012

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
                                 Marty Block, Chair
                    AB 2250 (Gaines) - As Amended:  March 21, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   Public postsecondary education: nonresident tuition: 
          military members.

           SUMMARY  :   Exempts active and former members of the Armed Forces 
          or State Military Reserve and their spouses from paying 
          nonresident tuition at the California State University (CSU) and 
          California Community Colleges (CCC).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Waives nonresident tuition at CSU and CCC for a student, or a 
            spouse of a student, who is an active member or former member 
            of the Armed Forces or State Military Reserve who has served 
            at least 36 months and received an honorable discharge.

          2)Defines Armed Forces as the Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, 
            Marine Corps, National Guard, Naval Militia, Navy, and the 
            reserve components of each of those forces, including the 
            California National Guard.

          3)Requests the University of California (UC) comply with these 
            provisions.

           EXISTING LAW  establishes uniform residency requirements for 
          purposes of ascertaining the amount of fees to be paid by 
          students at UC, CSU, and CCC and establishes various exceptions 
          to these residency requirements, including the following:

          1)A member of the Armed Forces who is stationed in the state on 
            active duty, except a member assigned for educational 
            purposes.  (Education Code � 68075)

          2)A member of the Armed Forces who is transferred to another 
            state but continuously enrolled at a college in California.  
            (EC � 68075)

          3)A student who is a dependent of a member of the Armed Forces 
            stationed in this state on active duty.  (EC � 68074)

          4)A student dependent of a member of the Armed Forces may keep 
            his or her resident classification until he or she has resided 








                                                                 AB 2250
                                                                  Page  2

            in the state for the minimum time necessary to become a 
            resident in the event the member of the Armed Forces upon whom 
            they are dependent is transferred outside of the state or 
            retires as an active member of the Armed Forces.  (EC � 
            68075.5)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown but potentially significant.

           COMMENTS :   This bill is double-referred to the Assembly 
          Veterans Affairs Committee.

           Background  .  Current law establishes the requirements for 
          determining residency for purposes of paying the lower-cost 
          "in-state" student fees at UC, CSU, and CCC.  To qualify for the 
          lower resident fees, students are generally required to have 
          resided in California for more than one year immediately 
          preceding the residence determination date and undertake other 
          specified actions such as registering to vote or registering 
          one's car in California.

           Recent hearing on student veteran issues  .  On February 28, 2012, 
          the Assembly Higher Education and Assembly Veterans Affairs 
          Committees held a joint oversight hearing on the challenges 
          facing California student veterans.  Several students and 
          representatives from the higher education institutions spoke for 
          the need for more resources for veterans services, including 
          more transition assistance, improving outreach and campus-based 
          programs, and easing the matriculation of prior military 
          learning.  The Committee may wish to consider whether funding 
          fee waivers for out-of-state student veterans should be a 
          priority in light of the need to improve services for California 
          student veterans whose taxes helped support their colleges and 
          universities.

           Need for this bill  .  According to the author, "This legislation 
          is necessary as a large amount of soldiers are coming back from 
          the War on Terror and we need to make higher education for them 
          a priority."  

           Other states  .  All states appear to require a veteran be a state 
          resident in order to qualify for in-state tuition/fee, and state 
          policies on spouses and dependents also require the veteran be a 
          state resident.

           Conflict with current active military nonresident fee exemption  . 








                                                                  AB 2250
                                                                  Page  3

           Existing law exempts active duty military and their spouses 
          from nonresident tuition unless the service member is here for 
          educational purposes.  This bill sets a higher standard by 
          requiring the service member to have served for 36 months before 
          qualifying for a waiver of nonresident tuition.  This bill would 
          also waive nonresident tuition for service members who are 
          stationed in California for educational purposes.  

           Benefits of California-resident classification for tuition and 
          fee purposes  .  UC, CSU, and CCC are publicly subsidized with the 
          proceeds of state taxes; the lower resident fees for students 
          who reside in California reflect the contribution they and their 
          parents have already made by paying taxes in California.  The 
          fees charged to non-California residents are intended to cover 
          the cost of the subsidy that is generated by California 
          taxpayers.  Tuition and fees for a full-time undergraduate 
          student in 2011-12 are:

                          Resident                       Out-of-State  
          UC                  $12,192$35,070
          CSU                           $5,472         $10,170
          CCC            $36 per unit   $244 per unit 

           What benefit does this bill provide  ?  This bill would primarily 
          apply to veterans from other states and their spouses, who would 
          otherwise be charged nonresident fees during their first year 
          while they establish residency.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits 
          fund a student's in-state tuition and fees.  Thus, in theory, 
          this bill would provide a subsidy equaling the difference 
          between the resident and non-resident fees at the student's 
          college or university during his or her first year.  After the 
          first year, when the student will have had the opportunity to 
          establish residency, the Post-9/11 GI Bill would fully cover the 
          student's fees.  However, by removing the one-year residency 
          requirement, a veteran has no incentive to become a California 
          resident.  The Committee may wish to consider whether it is 
          appropriate to provide this subsidy to veterans and their 
          spouses who do not have to demonstrate any intent to make 
          California their home or pay the taxes that support its public 
          services, including higher education.

           Should spouses be provided this benefit  ?  As noted previously 
          under Existing Law, spouses and dependents of active duty 
          service members stationed in California receive the benefit it 
          residency for tuition/fee purposes because their spouses' 








                                                                  AB 2250
                                                                  Page  4

          military assignment in California is beyond their control.  
          However, upon discharge, a veteran and his or her spouse are 
          free to establish residency where ever they choose, including 
          California.
           
           Should this benefit be need-based  ?  Most California financial 
          aid programs require demonstration of financial need.  Is it 
          appropriate to provide a significant state subsidy to all 
          persons eligible for this benefit without proof of need, 
          especially when the state is cutting existing programs?  

           Revenue loss to the segments  .  This bill does not provide 
          funding to backfill for the loss of non-resident fee revenue 
          that would likely result from this bill.  If the intent of this 
          bill is to provide a benefit to non-Californian members of the 
          military, it may be more appropriate to provide this benefit 
          directly, such as through a Cal Grant dedicated to these 
          students for the one year it takes to establish residency.  This 
          would allow the Legislature to more easily track the costs of 
          the program, as well as review its merits relative to other 
          student financial aid programs and other state-supported 
          programs, and would spare the segments revenue losses in 
          addition to those they have sustained in recent state budgets.  

           Related legislation  .  AB 2478 (Hayashi), which is set for 
          hearing in this Committee on March 27, 2012, would waive 
          nonresident tuition for up to four years for CCC students who 
          served on active duty for one year immediately prior to 
          discharge.  AB 38 (Salas, 2009), which died in the Assembly 
          Appropriations Committee, would have waived nonresident tuition 
          for one year.  SB 272 (Runner), Chapter 356, Statutes of 2007, 
          as introduced would have waived the one-year residency 
          requirement for former military members.  This provision was 
          deleted from the chaptered version.  AB 2472 (Wyland) of 2006, 
          was substantially similar to this bill and was held in the 
          Assembly Appropriations Committee.   

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges
          Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Department of 
          California









                                                                  AB 2250
                                                                  Page  5

           Opposition 
           
          >
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandra Fried / HIGHER ED. / (916) 
          319-3960