BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2271
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 23, 2012

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                                Henry T. Perea, Chair
                    AB 2271 (Perea) - As Amended:  March 29, 2012

          Majority vote.  Fiscal committee.  
           
          SUBJECT  :  Sales and Use Tax Law:  worthless accounts

           SUMMARY  :  Provides that a "bad debt" deduction or refund shall 
          not be disallowed solely because a proper election was not 
          established before claiming the deduction or refund.  
          Specifically,  this bill  provides that a "bad debt" deduction or 
          refund shall not be disallowed solely on the ground that a 
          proper election was not established prior to claiming the 
          deduction or refund if a proper election was established after 
          claiming the deduction or refund.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Relieves retailers from sales and use tax (SUT) liability on 
            transactions that were reported on a retailer's SUT return, 
            but which were subsequently found to be worthless and written 
            off for income tax purposes.  If a retailer is not required to 
            file income tax returns, the law allows a bad debt deduction 
            if the amount is charged off in accordance with generally 
            accepted accounting principles.  

          2)Provides that, in the case of accounts held by a lender, a 
            retailer or lender who makes a proper election, shall be 
            entitled to a deduction or refund of the SUT that the retailer 
            has previously reported and paid if the following conditions 
            are met:

             a)   No deduction was previously claimed or allowed on any 
               portion of the accounts;

             b)   The accounts have been found worthless and written off 
               by the lender; 

             c)   The contract between the retailer and the lender 
               contains an irrevocable relinquishment of all rights to the 
               account from the retailer to the lender; and,









                                                                  AB 2271
                                                                  Page  2

             d)   The party electing to claim the deduction or refund 
               files a claim in a manner prescribed by the State Board of 
               Equalization (BOE).  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  The BOE notes, "While enactment of this proposed 
          change in law would allow additional refunds or deductions that 
          are not currently allowable, it would not result in a revenue 
          loss per se.  These are amounts that would otherwise be subject 
          to refund or eligible for a deduction that the claimant failed 
          to obtain the election form claim."  

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)The BOE notes the following in its staff analysis of AB 2688 
            (Committee on Revenue and Taxation), of the current 
            legislative session, which contains nearly identical 
            provisions:
           
                The purpose of this revision is to address an unintended 
               consequence that has resulted in situations where the 
               lenders have failed to file properly completed election 
               forms when claiming the deduction or refund.  In such 
               cases, the claim for deduction or refund is not considered 
               valid.  Currently, staff allows the claimant to prepare and 
               file a proper election form after the claim for deduction 
               or refund is filed, but will not consider the claim valid 
               until such time as the election form is filed (see 
               Regulation 1642 (i)(5)(F), which interprets and explains 
               these provisions). Consequently, if an election form is not 
               filed by the lender within the general limitations period 
               for which a claim for refund or credit may be accepted as 
               timely under the law, the BOE is barred from accepting the 
               claim for deduction or refund for those periods that fall 
               outside the statute of limitations for filing refund claims 
               pursuant to Section 6902 (even if the claim itself was 
               filed within the limitations period).  Consequently, staff 
               has disallowed otherwise valid claims for deductions or 
               refunds by lenders for periods beyond the limitations 
               period.

               This bill would delete the requirement that the election 
               form be prepared and retained prior to claiming a deduction 
               or refund.  Therefore, the date of filing of a proper 
               election will have no �effect] on the date of filing of the 
               claim for a deduction or refund.  Even where the lender 








                                                                  AB 2271
                                                                  Page  3

               files a proper election form outside the limitations 
               period, the timeliness of the claim will still be 
               determined by the date of filing of the claim itself.  
                
           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :   

           Support 
           
          None on file 

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916) 
          319-2098