BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                                  SENATE HUMAN
                               SERVICES COMMITTEE
                            Senator Carol Liu, Chair


          BILL NO:       AB 2280                                     
          A
          AUTHOR:        Lara                                        
          B
          VERSION:       August 24, 2012
          HEARING DATE:  August 28, 2012 - pursuant to Rule 29.10    
          2
                                                                     
          2
                                                                     
          8
          CONSULTANT:    Mareva Brown                                
          0

                                        

                                     SUBJECT
                                         
            California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, 
                              Infants and Children

                                     SUMMARY  

          Requires the Department of Public Health, within 30 days 
          after the department has completed its first investigation, 
          to provide written notice to a vendor who has been found to 
          overcharge a nutrition coupon upon determination of an 
          initial violation, when the violation could be used later 
          to establish a pattern to impose a sanction. Requires the 
          department to deliver the notice to the vendor 30 days 
          before conducting a second investigation for purpose of 
          establishing a pattern of violation. States legislative 
          intent that these provisions clarify existing law.

                                     ABSTRACT  

          1.Establishes in federal law the Special Supplemental Food 
            Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in 
            recognition of the demonstrated relationship between good 
            nutrition and the capacity of children to develop and 
            learn (7 C.F.R. 246) and creates the California WIC 
                                                         Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2280 (Lara)           Page 
          2


          

            program to provide nutritional food supplements through 
            the issuance of nutrition coupons to low-income pregnant, 
            post-partum and lactating women and low-income infants 
            and children aged 5 and younger. (HSC 123280)

          2.Establishes protocols for vendors to accept nutrition 
            coupons from recipients, including a requirement that 
            coupon redemption be used only for specified foods and 
            that vendors redeem nutrition coupons at an amount that 
            is the same as, or lesser than, that charged other 
            customers for identical foods. (HSC 123315).

          3.Establishes that the state may levy sanctions, as 
            specified, against a vendor who knowingly redeems food 
            coupons in excess of prices charged other customers or 
            commits fraud, and authorizes the state to enter a 
            vendor's business to verify food prices, investigate or 
            otherwise determine compliance. (HSC 123325 et seq.)

          4.Defines in federal law specified vendor violations (7 
            C.F.R. 246.2)
           
          This bill

           1.Requires that the Department of Public Health (DPH) 
            provide written notice to a retail food vendor if the 
            department determines that the vendor has committed an 
            initial violation for which a pattern of the violation 
            must be established to impose a sanction. 

          2.Requires that DPH provide that notice no later than 30 
            days after the department completes the investigation.

          3.Requires that DPH deliver notice to a WIC vendor that it 
            is in violation of law 30 days before conducting a second 
            investigation of the same vendor for purposes of 
            establishing a pattern of violation. This notice must be 
            delivered:

                  a.         to the vendor's most recent business 
                    ownership address on file with DPH, or
                  b.        to the vendor location upon 
                    identification of a violation during a vendor 
                    monitoring visit, as specified.





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2280 (Lara)           Page 
          3


          

          4.Requires that the written notice to the vendor includes a 
            description of the initial violation and permits the 
            department to include information to assist the vendor to 
            take corrective action, including identifying a 60-day 
            window in which the violation occurred.

          5.Defines a "violation," as specified.

          6.Declares legislative intent that this bill clarifies 
            existing law.

                                  FISCAL IMPACT  

          An Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis indicates 
          that costs associated with this legislation would be minor 
          and absorbable within existing resources. The Senate 
          Appropriations committee did not analyze this bill.

                            BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION  

           Purpose of the bill

           According to the author, this bill would reconcile current 
          inconsistencies between state regulations and federal law 
          pertaining to vendor notifications of WIC program 
          violations.

          Federal WIC program regulations and a USDA WIC Final Policy 
          Memorandum (2005-1A) require states to notify vendors of an 
          initial violation prior to documenting another violation if 
          the violations are among those that require a pattern to 
          impose a sanction. The only exception in federal law is 
          when the state agency determines that notifying the vendor 
          would compromise an investigation. In contrast, the 
          California Code of Regulations directs that "a warning that 
          violations are occurring or have occurred is not required 
          prior to any adverse action taken against food vendors." 

          In order for WIC participants to access healthy, nutritious 
          foods, they must have access to state-approved WIC retail 
          food vendors in their communities. The author states that, 
          in addition to being contrary to federal regulations, the 
          state's failure to notify a vendor of a first or subsequent 
          violation before sanctions are imposed denies the vendor 
          the opportunity to take corrective action to prevent future 




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2280 (Lara)           Page 
          4


          

          violations. 

          Additionally, it puts the vendor in danger of 
          disqualification, potentially exacerbating the problem of 
          "food deserts" which restrict a community's access to 
          eligible food vendors and necessary food products. 
          According to USDA data provided by the author, 10 percent 
          of the nation resides in a food desert, including 1 million 
          low-income Californians who do not have nearby supermarkets 
          or large grocery stores.

           WIC 

           WIC is a 100% federally funded nutrition and health 
          program, providing funds for buying healthy supplemental 
          foods from WIC-authorized vendors. It also provides as 
          nutrition education, help finding healthcare and other 
          community services. The program aids low-income pregnant, 
          breastfeeding and post-partum women, as well as a 
          low-income parent who is the sole provider of a child under 
          age 5. Participants must be at nutritional risk, as 
          determined by a health professional, and at or below 185 
          percent of the federal poverty level ($42,642 for a family 
          of four).  Many WIC recipients are working parents. 

          In California, DPH administers contracts with 84 local WIC 
          agencies - half local governments and half private, 
          non-profit community organizations - to provide services at 
          more than 650 sites statewide to nearly 1.5 million 
          participants each month. Additionally, WIC checks can be 
          redeemed at any of the more than 5,500 participating 
          grocery stores. According to DPH, six million food checks 
          are issued each month.  Each check is valid for a 30-day 
          period and is payable for a specific type and quantity of 
          food.  DPH states that WIC is a direct infusion into the 
          California economy of about $1.1 billion per year, with the 
          retail value of WIC checks about $63 per month, per 
          participant.

           Recent Amendments  :

          This bill was heard in the Senate Human Services committee 
          on June 27, 2012 and amended on the floor on Friday, August 
          24. The author states that amendments were requested by the 
          Department of Public Health to conform to federal law. 




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2280 (Lara)           Page 
          5


          


          The bill's intent is to provide vendors with an opportunity 
          to correct violations before subsequent violations are 
          issued that may imperil their participation on the WIC 
          program. The intent of the bill has not changed. These 
          amendments alter the bill by prohibiting the DPH from 
          initiating a second investigation of a WIC vendor until 30 
          days after the vendor has been notified of a first 
          violation and specify where that notice is to be delivered. 
          They remove language that would have allowed DPH to bypass 
          the notification process in cases where DPH felt 
          notification would hamper an investigation.

          The amendments delete the requirement that the DPH provide 
          vendors with specific information about a violation, 
          including the location, date and description of the illegal 
          transaction. That language is replaced with general 
          language requiring "a description of the initial violation" 
          with permission to "include information that may assist the 
          vendor to take corrective action" including providing a 
          60-day window of the date in which the violation occurred.

                                   PRIOR VOTES
           
          Senate Human Services  5 - 0
          Assembly Floor 70 - 0
          Assembly Appropriations17 - 0
          Assembly Health     19 - 0 


                                    POSITIONS  

          Support:       California Chamber of Commerce
                         California Grocers Association
                         California Retailers Association

          Oppose:   None received


                                   -- END --