BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2292
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 2292 (Nielsen)
As Amended August 6, 2012
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |72-0 |(April 30, |SENATE: |39-0 |(August 9, |
| | |2012) | | |2012) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: JUD.
SUMMARY : Requires a juvenile court, at specified hearings, to
consider the admissible and relevant evidence before returning a
foster child to his or her parents. Specifically, this bill
requires that at a review or permanency hearing for a dependent
child or a delinquent child in the foster care system, the
juvenile court must consider the admissible and relevant
evidence when determining whether to return the child to his or
her parents or guardian or retain the child in foster care.
The Senate amendments add chaptering out language to coordinate
with AB 1712 (Beall) and SB 1064 (De Le�n).
EXISTING LAW :
1)Provides that a child may become a dependent of the juvenile
court and be removed from his or her parents or guardian on
the basis of abuse or neglect.
2)Provides that a juvenile court may adjudge a minor as a ward
of the court because the minor has committed criminal acts or
is habitually disobedient or truant and may detain the minor
if continuance in his or her home is contrary to the minor's
welfare. Placement of detained minors may include foster
care.
3)Requires the court, at the review hearing, to order a
dependent child returned to the custody of his or her parents
unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that returning the child would create a substantial risk of
harm to the child.
4)Requires the court, at the permanency hearing, whether held
timely or properly continued, to order a dependent child
AB 2292
Page 2
returned to the custody of his or her parents unless the court
finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that returning the
child would create a substantial risk of harm to the child.
5)Requires the court to review the status of each ward of the
court placed in foster care every six months. At review and
permanency hearings, requires the court to order the child
returned to the custody of his or her parents unless the court
finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that returning the
child would create a substantial risk of harm to the child.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar
to the version approved by the Senate.
FISCAL EFFECT : None
COMMENTS : This non-controversial bill seeks to ensure that
juvenile courts carefully consider the evidence before rendering
their decisions. Specifically, this bill requires that the
court at review and permanency hearings for foster children,
whether for dependent children or for wards of the court who are
also foster children, consider relevant and admissible evidence
before determining that it is safe to return a child to his or
her parents or guardian.
The author believes that this bill is necessary to protect
children during the reunification process: "Protecting children
should always be the priority of the judicial system. One
aspect that needs to be addressed is how our court system
handles reunification."
If the child is removed from his or her parents, then an initial
detention hearing is held either on the same day that the
petition is filed or on the next court day to determine whether
the minor should be further detained. Within 15 days of the
dependency court's decision to detain the child, the court must
hold a jurisdictional hearing to decide, based on a
preponderance of the evidence, whether the child falls within
the dependency court's jurisdiction. If the child continues to
be detained, a dispositional hearing is held no later than 10
days after the jurisdictional hearing.
The court must review the case of each foster child who has been
removed from his or her parents every six months. At this
review hearing, the court assesses the parents' progress towards
AB 2292
Page 3
possible reunification. The court can reunify the family and
dismiss the case, reunify the family and continue to monitor the
family through family maintenance services, or maintain the case
without, at that point, reunification.
Generally within 12 months after the child is removed from his
or her parents, the court must determine, in a permanency
hearing, whether the child should be returned home or whether
efforts to reunite the family should be terminated. If the
child is not returned home, efforts could still continue to
reunify the family. If reunification efforts end, the court
must determine a different permanency plan for the child.
Possibilities include adoption, legal guardianship or some other
permanent arrangement.
At each of the hearings affected by this bill - the review and
the permanency hearings - there is a statutory presumption that
a child should be returned to his or her parents or guardian.
In order not to return the child, the court must be satisfied by
a preponderance of the evidence that returning the child would
create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety,
protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child.
The court must read and consider the social worker's report, as
well as other reports or evidence submitted.
This bill simply clarifies that the court must consider the
relevant and admissible evidence before ruling. As such, this
bill is declarative of existing law, which requires the court to
consider the evidence before making an order.
Analysis Prepared by : Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916)
319-2334
FN: 0004552