BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2334
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 9, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     AB 2334 (Fong) - As Amended:  April 9, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Water, Parks and 
          Wildlife     Vote:                            8-3
                        Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials7-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Department of Water Resources (DWR), as 
          part of updating the California Water Plan, to:

          1)Identify water systems struggling or failing to meet federal 
            affordability benchmarks.

          2)Determine factors contributing to the high cost of these 
            systems.

          3)Assess existing low-income water affordability programs.

          4)Propose subsidy programs to make water affordable for 
            communities facing especially high costs for water rates, as 
            defined.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual costs to DWR of an unknown amount, likely ranging from 
          several hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million dollars. 
          (General Fund, special funds and bond funds). 

          These annual costs to DWR include the work of a small team of 
          economists, demographers and analysts working to identify, among 
          the state's thousands of water systems, those water systems 
          struggling to meet federal affordability benchmarks; determining 
          the factors contributing to the high cost of these systems; 
          assessing existing low-income water affordability programs 
          (which, presumably, include local, state and federal programs, 
          as well as privately operated programs); and developing a 








                                                                  AB 2334
                                                                  Page  2

          proposal for subsidy programs.  All of this work falls well 
          outside the normal scope of the Water Plan and well beyond its 
          normal depth, making the information and analysis required by 
          this bill a significant, distinct addition to the plan.  

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   The author notes the prevalence of Californians 
            who do not have access to affordable clean drinking water or 
            wastewater services, both of which the author describes as 
            basic necessities.  The author intends this bill to establish 
            a process by which to assess the scale of the problem of 
            drinking water and wastewater accessibility so that 
            appropriate policies may be developed to address the problem. 


           2)Background  .  

              a)   State Water Plans.   DWR is legally required to update 
               the California Water Plan every five years. The plan 
               presents basic data and information on California's water 
               resources, including water supply evaluations and 
               assessments of agricultural, urban, and environmental water 
               uses to quantify the gap between water supplies and uses. 
               The plan also identifies and evaluates existing and 
               proposed statewide demand management and water supply 
               augmentation programs and projects to address the State's 
               water needs. According to DWR, the Water Plan is a 
               high-level document that assists water managers in managing 
               water in the state.  The Water Plan focuses on water supply 
               management, not drinking water quality or affordability.  
               DWR last updated the plan in 2009 and plans its next update 
               for 2013. 

               Statute also requires the Department of Public Health (DPH) 
               to update a Drinking Water Plan every five years. The 
               Drinking Water Plan must include, among other subjects, an 
               analysis of the overall quality of California's drinking 
               water; identification of specific water quality problems 
               and the types and levels of contaminants found in public 
               drinking water systems; an analysis of the known and 
               potential health risks that may be associated with drinking 
               water contamination; an evaluation of how existing water 
               quality information systems currently maintained by local 
               or state agencies can be more effectively used to protect 








                                                                  AB 2334
                                                                  Page  3

               drinking water; and an analysis of the current cost of 
               drinking water paid by residential, business, and 
               industrial consumers based on a statewide survey of large, 
               medium, and small public water systems. 

               Despite statutory requirements, DPH has not updated the 
               plan since 1993 because, according to the department, it 
               has not received funding to update the plan.  Pursuant to a 
               recent court settlement, DPH has agreed to submit a 
               drinking water plan within three years.

              b)   Many Californians Lack Access to Affordable Clean Water  . 
                As noted in a recent United Nations report, the Central 
               Valley relies on groundwater for 90% of its drinking water, 
               and much of that groundwater is contaminated.  Residents 
               who are serviced by water systems with contaminated water 
               supplies oftentimes must purchase bottled water at a cost 
               considerably higher than water system rates. Others 
               residents, who cannot afford to purchase supplemental water 
               or who are unaware of drinking water contamination issues 
               or both, drink water contaminated with nitrates, arsenic or 
               other contaminants.

           3)Support  .  This bill is supported by a long list of 
            organizations that advocate on behalf of human rights, 
            including, though not exclusively, the rights of immigrants, 
            poor people and disadvantaged communities. 

           4)There is no opposition formally registered to this bill.
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081