BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2339
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2339 (Williams and V. Manuel P�rez)
          As Amended  May 2, 2012
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE             12-1               NATURAL 
          RESOURCES                9-0    
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bradford, Buchanan, Fong, |Ayes:|Chesbro, Knight,          |
          |     |Fuentes, Bonnie           |     |Brownley, Dickinson,      |
          |     |Lowenthal, Gorell,        |     |Grove, Halderman,         |
          |     |Roger Hern�ndez, Ma,      |     |Huffman, Monning, Skinner |
          |     |Nestande, Skinner,        |     |                          |
          |     |Swanson, Valadao,         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Ammiano, Hill, Lara,      |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Energy Commission (CEC), in 
          consultation with the California Public Utilities Commission 
          (PUC), State Air Resources Board (ARB), and other stakeholders, 
          to evaluate policies to overcome barriers to the widespread 
          deployment and use of geothermal heat pump and geothermal ground 
          loop technologies by July 1, 2013.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) that defines 
            renewable energy resources as an electrical facility connected 
            to the electrical grid and requires 33% of utility portfolios 
            to be from renewable energy by 2020.






                                                                  AB 2339
                                                                  Page  2


          2)Establishes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction goals.

          3)Establishes minimum building energy efficiency standards for 
            new and remodeled homes.

          4)Provides incentives for greater levels of energy efficiency 
            features in new and existing homes.

          5)Provides incentives for self-generation by renewable 
            generation technologies that interconnect to the electrical 
            grid.

          6)Provides incentives for solar thermal water heating 
            technologies.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, one-time special fund costs of about $100,000 for CEC 
          to complete the study, which will be absorbed within the balance 
          of the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) funds.



           COMMENTS  :

             Author's statement  .  According to the U.S. Department of 
            Energy, nearly 40% of all U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide are 
            the results of using energy to heat, cool, and provide hot 
            water to buildings.  Additionally, more than 70% of average 
            energy demand for a typical single family home is to meet 
            hearing and cooling needs.

            Geothermal heat pumps and solar heating and cooling 
            technologies can play an important role in reducing 
            electricity demand and increasing efficiency within the built 
            environment. Additionally, the potential for employment and 
            job growth is yet untapped as California seriously 
            underutilizes these technologies.  There should be a state 
            effort to identify and address why such readily available, 
            efficient, and cost effective technologies are underutilized 
            in California when they can save consider able amounts of 
            energy used for heating and cooling.

             When is renewable not renewable  ?  RPS definition of renewables 
            does not include all renewable technologies.  Technologies 
            like geothermal heat pumps or solar heating can displace 
            electricity rather than generate electricity.  Because they do 
            not generate electricity, they are not renewable with respect 





                                                                  AB 2339
                                                                  Page  3


            to RPS.

             So are they efficient  ?  When CEC and PUC determine eligibility 
            for standards and incentive programs they do cost 
            effectiveness evaluations.  PUC has multiple cost 
            effectiveness methodologies, including ones for energy 
            efficiency and self-generation.  Geothermal heat pumps and 
            solar heating and cooling technologies do not fare well in 
            terms of cost effectiveness because renewable energy 
            technologies do not fit well into the energy efficiency cost 
            effectiveness methodology.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Susan Kateley / U. & C. / (916) 
          319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0003924