BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �          1





                SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
                                 ALEX PADILLA, CHAIR
          

          AB 2339 -  Williams                               Hearing Date:  
          June 19, 2012              A
          As Amended:         June 12, 2012            FISCAL       B

                                                                        2
                                                                        3
                                                                        3
                                                                        9

                                      DESCRIPTION
           
           Current law  establishes the California Energy Commission (CEC) 
          which is charged with, among other duties, developing energy 
          policies that conserve resources, protect the environment, 
          ensure energy reliability, enhance the state's economy, and 
          protect public health and safety.  Those policies are reported 
          biennially in the Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR).

           Current law  requires the CEC to develop, implement, and 
          administer a program the Public Interest Energy Research Program 
          (PIER) the purpose of which is to develop, and help bring to 
          market, energy technologies that provide increased environmental 
          benefits, greater system reliability, lower system costs, and 
          tangible benefits to electric utility customers. PIER was funded 
          under prior law with a public goods charge of $62.5 million per 
          year assessed on electric customers in the territories of the 
          investor-owned utilities (IOUs).

           This bill  would require the CEC to evaluate and recommend 
          policies and implementation strategies to overcome barriers to 
          the deployment of geothermal heat pump and geothermal ground 
          loop technologies.

                                      BACKGROUND
           
          Geothermal Heat Pump Systems - According to the U.S. Department 
          of Energy, geothermal heat pumps (sometimes referred to as 
          GeoExchange, earth-coupled, ground-source, or water-source heat 
          pumps) have been in use since the late 1940s.  Geothermal heat 
          pumps (GHPs) use the constant temperature of the earth as the 











          exchange medium instead of the outside air temperature. This 
          allows the system to reach fairly high efficiencies (300%-600%) 
          on the coldest of winter nights, compared to 175%-250% for 
          air-source heat pumps on cool days.

          While many parts of the country experience seasonal temperature 
          extremes - from scorching heat in the summer to sub-zero cold in 
          the winter - a few feet below the earth's surface the ground 
          remains at a relatively constant temperature. Depending on 
          latitude, ground temperatures range from 45?F (7?C) to 75?F 
          (21?C). Like a cave, this ground temperature is warmer than the 
          air above it during the winter and cooler than the air in the 
          summer. The GHP takes advantage of this by exchanging heat with 
          the earth through a ground heat exchanger. 

          As with any heat pump, geothermal and water-source heat pumps 
          are able to heat, cool, and, if so equipped, supply a building 
          with hot water.  Some models of geothermal systems are available 
          with two-speed compressors and variable fans for more comfort 
          and energy savings.  Relative to air-source heat pumps, they are 
          quieter, last longer, need little maintenance, and do not depend 
          on the temperature of the outside air.

          Even though the installation price of a geothermal system can be 
          several times that of an air-source system of the same heating 
          and cooling capacity, the additional costs are returned to the 
          consumer in energy savings in 5-10 years.  System life is 
          estimated at 25 years for the inside components and 50+ years 
          for the ground loop. There are approximately 50,000 geothermal 
          heat pumps installed in the United States each year.

          Benefits of Geothermal Heat Pump Systems - The biggest benefit 
          of GHPs is that they use 25%-50% less electricity than 
          conventional heating or cooling systems. This translates into a 
          GHP using one unit of electricity to move three units of heat 
          from the earth. According to the Environmental Protection 
          Agency, geothermal heat pumps can reduce energy consumption - 
          and corresponding emissions - up to 44% compared to air-source 
          heat pumps and up to 72% compared to electric resistance heating 
          with standard air-conditioning equipment. GHPs also improve 
          humidity control by maintaining about 50% relative indoor 
          humidity, making GHPs very effective in humid areas.

          Integrated Energy Policy Report - The CEC is required to prepare 










          a biennial integrated energy policy report that contains an 
          assessment of major energy trends and issues facing the state's 
          electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and 
          provides policy recommendations to conserve resources; protect 
          the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy 
          supplies; enhance the state's economy; and protect public health 
          and safety.  The CEC prepares these assessments and associated 
          policy recommendations every two years as part of the IEPR.  
          Preparation of the IEPR involves close collaboration with 
          federal, state, and local agencies and a wide variety of 
          stakeholders in an extensive public process to identify critical 
          energy issues and develop strategies to address those issues.

          The most recent IEPR included a summary of priority energy 
          issues currently facing California with strategies and 
          recommendations to further the state's goal of ensuring 
          reliable, affordable, and environmentally responsible energy 
          sources.  Energy topics covered in the report include progress 
          toward statewide renewable energy targets and issues facing 
          future renewable development; efforts to increase energy 
          efficiency in existing and new buildings; progress by utilities 
          in achieving energy efficiency targets and potential; improving 
          coordination among the state's energy agencies; streamlining 
          power plant licensing processes; results of preliminary 
          forecasts of electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel 
          supply and demand; future energy infrastructure needs; the need 
          for research and development efforts to support statewide energy 
          policies; and issues facing California's nuclear power plants.

          Public Interest Energy Research - PIER program has been the 
          state's energy research development and demonstration program, 
          advancing science and technology in the fields of energy 
          efficiency, renewable energy, advanced electricity technologies, 
          energy-related environmental protection, and transmission and 
          distribution, and transportation technologies.  Historically the 
          program was funded through the public goods charge the source of 
          which was a surcharge on electric ratepayers.  The authority for 
          that funding sunset January 1, 2012 and the CEC is transitioning 
          its research program to conform to action by the California 
          Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) which authorized a new 
          surcharge termed the "Electric Program Investment Charge 
          (EPIC)."  The CPUC has directed the investor-owned utilities to 
          collect from ratepayers and send to the CEC $115 million 
          annually to fund applied research, technology demonstration and 










          deployment and market support programs.  

                                       COMMENTS
           
              1.   Author's Purpose  .  According to the author AB 2339 
               requires the CEC to identify and address existing barriers 
               to the widespread deployment of geothermal heat pumps and 
               geothermal ground loop technologies.  There should be a 
               statewide effort to identify and address why such readily 
               available, efficient and cost effective technologies are 
               not widely used in California. 
           
               He further reports that increased deployment of geothermal 
               heat pumps will reduce the need for fossil fuel powered 
               peak generation, improve utility load factor, provide 
               on-site consumer energy savings without the need for 
               rebates and provide all of the benefits that drive the 
               desire for renewable energy standards without putting 
               pressure on electric rates or ratepayer's energy bills.  

              2.   CEC Direction  .  The bill broadly requires the CEC to 
               research and develop policy strategies for the expanded use 
               of GHPs.  The CEC has two general programs for research and 
               policy development - the Public Interest Energy Research 
               Program and the Integrated Energy Policy Report.  However, 
               the bill does not reference which evaluative tool is to be 
               used.  The approach, funding and outcome of each program 
               are very different.  In this case the IEPR appears to be 
               the best avenue to achieve the author's purpose which is to 
               enhance the deployment of use of the technology (IEPR) not 
               research the technical aspects or effectiveness of the 
               technology (PIER).  Historically the Legislature has not 
               dictated the use of PIER funds to specified projects 
               because it sidesteps the integrity of the research process 
               and the goals of the PIER program as outlined by the 
               Legislature.  Consequently, the committee may wish to 
               consider amendments that move the directive in this bill 
               under the rubric and funding of the IEPR.

              3.   Double Referral  .  Should this bill be approved by the 
               committee, it should be re-referred to the Senate Committee 
               on Environmental Quality for its consideration.

                                    ASSEMBLY VOTES










           
          Assembly Floor                     (76-0)
          Assembly Appropriations Committee  (17-0)
          Assembly Natural Resources Committee                           
          (9-0)
          Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee                      
          (12-1)

                                           



                                      POSITIONS
           
           Sponsor:
           
          California Geothermal Heat Pump Coalition

           Support:
           
          Air Connection
          Bosch Thermotechnology Corp.
          California Groundwater Association
          ClimateMaster
          Colorado Geo Energy and Heat Pump Association
          Crystal Air
          Desert GeoExchange
          Energy Control Inc.
          Enertech Global, LLC
          Environmental Defense Center
          Gaia Geothermal, LLC
          Geothermal Exchange Organization
          Geothermal National & International Initiative
          Geothermal Resource Group
          Ground Source energy NW
          HeatSpring Learning Institute
          Meline Engineering Corp.
          Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
          WaterFurnace

           Oppose:
           
          None on file











          










          Kellie Smith 
          AB 2339 Analysis
          Hearing Date:  June 19, 2012