BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2364
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 16, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 2364 (Wagner) - As Amended:  April 30, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              JudiciaryVote:9-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill establishes procedures for service of process and 
          execution of levies at a central location designated by a bank 
          and its other branches. Specifically, this bill:

             1)   Requires a bank or financial institution that has more 
               than nine branch offices in this state, and authorizes 
               those with less than nine, to designate one or more central 
               locations for service of legal process within the state. 
               Further provides that if the institution fails to make the 
               designation, then each branch shall be deemed to be a 
               central location at which service may be made.

             2)   Requires the bank to file a notice of its designation 
               with the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI), and 
               requires DFI to update its online records to reflect 
               current designations within 10 days of filing. DFI is to 
               provide this information to any person requesting it, and 
               may satisfy this requirement by making the information 
               available for free to the public on its web site.


             3)   Clarifies that the effects of service of legal process 
               and execution of levies served within California is limited 
               to accounts and safety deposit boxes maintained at a bank's 
               branches and offices within this state, and not other 
               states or countries.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Minor absorbable ongoing costs to DFI for filing banks' 
          designations and making this information available on its 








                                                                  AB 2364
                                                                  Page  2

          website. �Financial Institutions Fund]

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  . Attachment is an order by a court, while a civil 
            action is pending, directing that money or property of the 
            defendant be held as security for the eventual satisfaction of 
            a judgment, if one is obtained. Attachment is thus a 
            provisional remedy to aid the plaintiff in the collection of a 
            money judgment by seizure of the defendant's money or property 
            in advance of a trial or judgment. It is ordered when a court, 
            after a hearing on an application for a writ of attachment, 
            finds that the plaintiff has established the probable validity 
            of the claim. In contrast, writs of execution are issued only 
            after judgment is entered by the court. They permit the 
            judgment creditor to collect against the property of the 
            judgment debtor, including deposit accounts held by a 
            financial institution. In short, attachment can be seen as a 
            pre-judgment security device, while execution of levy is a 
            post-judgment collection device. 

           2)Purpose  . This bill-sponsored by the Consumer Financial 
            Services Committee, Business Law Section of the State 
            Bar-amends service of process rules for both attachment to and 
            execution of levies upon accounts, safe deposit boxes, and 
            other property held by the debtor or defendant's bank. 
            According to the author, this bill seeks to address two 
            problems that arise from these current procedures for service 
            of levies. First, conducting discovery or a debtor's 
            examination to identify the proper branch to serve can add 
            hundreds or even thousands of dollars of unnecessary expenses 
            to the cost of judgment collection, a cost that may be added 
            to the amount owed by the judgment debtor. Second, the current 
            requirement that the judgment creditor serve the proper branch 
            can also facilitate the concealment of assets by a dishonest 
            judgment debtor, because an examination of the debtor to 
            identify the branch can prompt the debtor to move the funds 
            and game the system. 

            By facilitating service of process at a central location 
            instead of at individual branches, the author contends this 
            bill will reduce unnecessary expenses on collection, and will 
            prevent unscrupulous debtors from manipulating the rules to 
            avoid their obligations. For example, given the relatively 
            concentrated nature of the banking industry today, the sponsor 








                                                                  AB 2364
                                                                  Page  3

            estimates that a creditor serving levies on the central 
            locations designated by just a handful of the largest banks 
            would probably capture a sizable majority of all of the 
            deposit accounts and safe deposit boxes in California. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081