BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2370|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2370
          Author:   Mansoor (R), et al.
          Amended:  8/29/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/13/12
          AYES:  Hernandez, Harman, Alquist, Anderson, DeSaulnier, 
            Rubio, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Blakeslee, De Le�n

           SENATE FLOOR  :  38-0, 8/21/12
          AYES:  Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, 
            Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Hancock, Hernandez, 
            Huff, Kehoe, La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, 
            Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, Simitian, 
            Steinberg, Strickland, Vargas, Walters, Wolk, Wright, 
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman, Runner

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 8/24/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Mental retardation:  change of term to 
          intellectual disabilities

           SOURCE  :     Best Buddies California


           DIGEST  :    This bill deletes in state law references to 
          mental retardation" or a "mentally retarded person" and 
          instead replaces them with "intellectual disability" or "a 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2370
                                                                Page 
          2

          person with an intellectual disability."  

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/29/12 make further technical 
          and conforming changes to this bill to make the language 
          identical to SB 1381 (Pavley) and to prevent chaptering 
          conflicts with SB 1009 (Senate Budget and Fiscal Review 
          Committee), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2012.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/15/12 make various conforming 
          changes to this bill to make the language identical to SB 
          1381 (Pavley) and to prevent chaptering conflicts with 
          other bills. The changes also provide clarification and 
          consistency by, for example, using person-first language 
          (changing "intellectually disabled person" to "person with 
          an intellectual disability").

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law refers to "mental retardation" or 
          "a mentally retarded person" in numerous state statutory 
          provisions, including provisions relating to psychiatric 
          technician regulation, the state's unfair competition 
          statute, educational and social services, commitment to 
          state facilities, and criminal punishment.

          This bill:

          1.Deletes references to mental retardation or a mentally 
            retarded person and instead replaces them with 
            "intellectual disability" or "a person with an 
            intellectual disability."  

          2.Prohibits standards in effect at the time of enactment 
            from being construed as making a substantive change in 
            law, a change of services being provided, or eligibility.

          3.States that, as used in a state regulation, state 
            publication, or other writing, the terms "mental 
            retardation" and "mentally retarded person" have the same 
            meaning as the terms "intellectual disability" and 
            "person with intellectual disability," unless the context 
            or an explicit provision of federal or state law clearly 
            requires a different meaning."

          4.Shall be known as the Shriver "R-Word" Act.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2370
                                                                Page 
          3

           Background
           
          The Resource Network International contracted with the 
          Kansas University Center for the Study of Family, 
          Neighborhood and Community Policy to do an in-depth study 
          related to the past and current use of the term "mental 
          retardation" in the context of government programs. 
          Published in 2002, the study, entitled "Usage of the Term 
          'Mental Retardation:'  Language, Image and Public 
          Education," found there are many definitions of mental 
          retardation but four are the most prevalent. The term 
          "mental retardation" is used consistently in the United 
          States far more than other terms and the next most 
          consistent equivalent term is "intellectual disability," 
          which is used in British Commonwealth countries and by the 
          International Society for the Scientific Study of 
          Intellectual Disabilities.  There has recently been a move 
          away from the term "mental retardation," but no substitute 
          has been agreed upon.  The general consensus among 
          activists and responders to surveys (advocates, clinicians, 
          families, parents, or other professionals) is that the term 
          has negative connotations although many concede that any 
          substitute for the same population will also soon develop 
          stigmatizing qualities.  There is also fear among some that 
          a name change will endanger entitlement programs, but the 
          current momentum is to change the term. 
          
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/17/12)

          Best Buddies California (source) 
          Association of Regional Center Agencies
          California Disability Services Association
          Dayle McIntosh Disability Resource Centers
          Junior League of Orange County, California
          North Los Angeles County Regional Center
          Sacramento County Developmental Disabilities Planning and 
          Advisory                                               
          Council
          Special Olympics Northern California
          The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy in California


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2370
                                                                Page 
          4

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Best Buddies California, writes 
          that, while California is usually on the cutting edge of 
          legislation, the majority of states have already changed 
          their statutes to eliminate the "R-word" with the goal to 
          eliminate a term that promotes a negative stereotype of 
          intellectually disabled individuals.  The Arc and United 
          Cerebral Palsy in California states that eliminating the 
          "R-word" in all usage is a high priority for the 
          developmental disability community in order to build 
          respect for people with intellectual disabilities and that, 
          while the "R-word" was once intended to be a term of 
          respect, times and terms have changed, and "R-word" now 
          inflicts intentional or unintentional pain and is used in 
          bullying and hate crimes.




           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 8/24/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, 
            Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, 
            Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, 
            Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, 
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, 
            Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cook, Donnelly, Halderman, Roger 
            Hern�ndez, Mitchell


          CTW:n   8/30/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****




                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2370
                                                                Page 
          5














































                                                           CONTINUED