BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
AB 2392 (J. Perez) - Medi-Cal: interpreter services.
Amended: May 25, 2012 Policy Vote: Health 6-3
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: August 16, 2012
Consultant: Brendan McCarthy
SUSPENSE FILE.
Bill Summary: AB 2392 would require the Department of Health
Care Services to establish a program to provide interpretation
services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have limited English
proficiency.
Fiscal Impact:
One-time costs likely in the hundreds of thousands to
develop program guidelines, seek necessary federal
approvals, and develop billing systems.
Ongoing costs of about $30 million per year to provide
translation services in fee-for-service Medi-Cal.
Unknown costs in Medi-Cal managed care. Under current law,
health plans are required to provide interpretation
services, including managed care plans that contract with
the Department of Health Care Services. It is unclear
whether the bill's requirement to provide "certified medical
interpretation services" would increase costs for
translation services, above the costs already being
incurred.
The federal financial participation rate for the costs
above may vary. For interpretive services provided to
children and their family members, the state can claim a 75%
federal financial participation rate. However, those costs
are only eligible for a 75% federal cost share if they are
billed as administrative costs (as opposed to benefits). For
childless adults, the rate is generally 50%.
Background: Under federal law and regulation, health care
providers that accept federal funding are required to provide
AB 2392 (J. Perez)
Page 1
linguistically accessible services to all patients. Under state
law and contract requirements with the Department of Health Care
Services, health plans providing Medi-Cal managed care service
are required to provide translation services to patients.
Despite these requirements in law, there are indications that
not all Medi-Cal beneficiaries are receiving care in a
linguistically appropriate manner. According to the California
Health Interview Survey, about 8% of adults in Medi-Cal had
difficulty understanding their doctor or required another person
to help them understand their doctor. Similarly, about 7% of the
parents of children enrolled in Medi-Cal had difficulty
understanding their doctor or needed another person to help them
understand their doctor.
Proposed Law: AB 2392 would require the Department of Health
Care Services to establish a program to provide interpretation
services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have limited English
proficiency.
Specifically, the bill:
Would require the Department of Health Care Services to
seek federal funding to establish a program to provide for
certified medical interpretation services to Medi-Cal
beneficiaries.
Would require the services to be provided in both Medi-Cal
fee-for-service managed care.
Would authorize providers or managed care plans contracting
with Medi-Cal to use the program.
Would require the Department to develop a mechanism to
leverage existing sources of funding to offset additional
General Fund costs.
Staff Comments: The availability of enhanced federal financial
participation for translation services indicates that there may
be opportunities to improve access to care for non-English
proficient Medi-Cal beneficiaries at a reduced cost to the
state. On the other hand, it is not clear whether the program to
provide certified translation services, are required under the
bill, would be a more economical method of providing translation
services than the current methods used by health care providers.
If a centralized system managed by the Department is more costly
than the methods currently in use, cost savings may be minimal.
AB 2392 (J. Perez)
Page 2
Improving translation services for people with limited English
proficiency would likely have mixed impacts on Medi-Cal costs.
By improving enrollees' ability to communicate with providers,
the bill is likely to enable enrollees to more easily access
care, increasing utilization and costs. On the other hand,
better communication between a patient and a provider may
improve the patient and the provider's ability to manage the
patient's health, potentially reducing long-term costs.