BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2473
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 8, 2012

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
                     AB 2473 (Atkins) - Amended:  March 29, 2010

           SUBJECT  :  COURT SECURITY: EXTERIOR AREAS

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE SHERIFF BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SECURITY 
          SERVICES EXTERIOR TO A COURTHOUSE, IF AGREED TO BY THE SHERIFF 
          AND THE TRIAL COURT?

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed 
          non-fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS

          Today, court security services -- ranging from bailiff functions 
          within courtrooms to the patrol of court facilities - are 
          provided by the sheriff in almost all counties.  This bill, 
          sponsored by the San Diego County Sheriff's Department and the 
          California State Sheriff's Association, allows the sheriff, if 
          agreed to by the trial court in that county, to provide security 
          services in the exterior of a court facility, in addition to 
          interior security services.  According to the author, a safe 
          court environment requires security planning addressing both 
          interior and exterior areas of the courthouses.  This bill 
          allows, but does not require that, court security services 
          provided by the sheriffs to include exterior areas.  This bill 
          does not provide any additional funds to pay for such services.  
          There is no known opposition to this bill.

           SUMMARY  :  Permits a sheriff to provide security services in the 
          exterior of a court facility, if agreed to by the superior court 
          and the sheriff.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Allows court security services agreed to by a superior court 
            and the sheriff to include, but not be limited to:

             a)   Performing bailiff functions;
             b)   Taking charge of a jury;
             c)   Patrolling hallways and other areas within the court;
             d)   Overseeing prisoners in holding cells in the court;
             e)   Escorting prisoners to and from those holding cells;
             f)   Providing security screening within the court;








                                                                  AB 2473
                                                                  Page  2

             g)   Providing enhanced security for judges and court 
               personnel; and
             h)   Providing security in areas adjacent to a court facility 
               to the extent necessary to protect the safety of people 
               using the facility.

          2)Clarifies that the sheriff shall attend all superior court 
            sessions within his or her county whenever required.   

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Provides that the duties of the presiding judge of each 
            superior court shall include the authority to contract with a 
            sheriff or marshal for the necessary level of law enforcement 
            services in the courts.  Defines " law enforcement functions" 
            as all of the following:

             a)   Bailiff functions in criminal and noncriminal actions, 
               including, but not limited to, attending courts;
             b)   Taking charge of a jury; 
             c)   Patrolling hallways and other areas within court 
               facilities; 
             d)   Overseeing prisoners in holding cells within court 
               facilities; 
             e)   Escorting prisoners in holding cells within court 
               facilities; 
             f)   Providing security screening within court facilities; 
             g)   Providing enhanced security for bench officers and court 
               personnel, as agreed upon by the court and the sheriff or 
               marshal.  (Government Code Sections 69921-21.5.  Unless 
               stated otherwise, all further statutory references are to 
               this code.)

          2)Except as otherwise provided, requires a sheriff, as 
            specified, to attend all superior court actions held within 
            his or her county.  Provides that the court may use court 
            attendants in courtrooms hearing noncriminal, nondelinquency 
            actions where the sheriff's attendance is not required.  
            (Section 69922.)

          3)Requires the sheriff or marshal, in conjunction with the 
            presiding judge, to develop an annual or multiyear 
            comprehensive court security plan that includes the mutually 
            agreed upon law enforcement security plan, to be utilized by 
            the court.  Provides that Judicial Council shall annually 








                                                                  AB 2473
                                                                  Page  3

            submit to the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees a 
            report summarizing the court security plans reviewed by 
            Judicial Council.  (Section 69925.)

          4)Requires that the cost of services in the court security MOU 
            between each superior court and the sheriff or marshal must be 
            based on estimated average cost of salary and benefits for 
            equivalent personnel classifications in that county, not 
            including overtime and retiree health benefits, as defined.  
            Provides that actual court security allocations shall be 
            subject to the approval of the Judicial Council and the 
            funding provided by the Legislature.  (Section 69926.)

          5)Directs the Judicial Council to establish a working group on 
            court security to promulgate recommended uniform standards and 
            guidelines that may be used by the Judicial Council and any 
            sheriff or marshal for the implementation of trial court 
            security services.  (Section 69927.)

           COMMENTS  :  Today, most court security services -- ranging from 
          bailiff functions within courtrooms to the patrol of court 
          facilities - are provided by the sheriff in 56 counties and 
          marshals, who are employees of the court, in Shasta and Trinity 
          counties.  Court attendants provide some of the security in 
          civil and juvenile courts.  This bill, sponsored by the San 
          Diego County Sheriff's Department and the California State 
          Sheriff's Association, allows the sheriff, if agreed to by the 
          trial court in that county, to provide security services in the 
          exterior of a court facility, in addition to interior security 
          services.  According to the author:

               The State Sheriffs' Departments have the responsibility of 
               providing a secure, safe environment for the public and 
               staff in courthouses.  A safe and secure environment must 
               include the exterior as well as the interior of the 
               building in which the court is housed.  

               Courthouses have been targets of violence including 
               shootings, explosive devices and assaults.  High profile 
               court trials such as Mexican drug cartels create a new 
               paradigm for modern courthouses.  Security planning must 
               address exterior areas of courthouses to mitigate the 
               threat from those who would use unattended property, 
               suspicious objects or vehicles to facilitate acts of 
               violence against a courthouse and its occupants. 








                                                                  AB 2473
                                                                  Page  4


           While Security Services are Contracted for Locally with the 
          Sheriffs, the State Picks Up the Tab, Even After Realignment  .  
          To standardize court security, help implement court unification, 
          and as part of the state take over of trial court funding, the 
          Legislature passed the Superior Court Law Enforcement Act, SB 
          1396 (Dunn), Chap. 1010, Stats. 2002, which helped create 
          greater consistency in court security services by simplifying 
          the process of negotiations over court security and establishing 
          a specific set of guidelines both as to procedures and as to 
          what were allowable costs.  Unfortunately, the simplified 
          process did not help keep court security costs from increasing 
          significantly or guarantee adequate funding for court security 
          services.  

          Court security funding had been part of the funds allocated to 
          the judicial branch.  The Judicial Council then allocated to 
          each trial court its respective share, which the trial courts 
          then paid to the sheriffs.  Last year, as part of realignment, 
          funding for sheriff- provided court security was sent directly 
          to the county.  As such, realignment changed the direct source 
          of funding for court security - the county and not the court - 
          although not the underlying source - the general fund and 
          specified fines and fees.  Realignment did not, however, change 
          the nature of the services required, neither reducing court 
          security service delivery nor increasing obligations on
          sheriffs or counties.

           This Bill Permits, But Does Not Require, Sheriffs to Provide 
          Security Services in the Exterior of Each Courthouse .  This bill 
          permits the security services agreed upon by the trial court and 
          the sheriff to include the perimeter of the courthouse.  It does 
          not, however, require that such services be provided by the 
          sheriff.  If it did, this bill would undoubtedly have, what 
          could be, significant fiscal impacts.  According to the author, 
          this bill does not require any additional funding unless the 
          security plan agreed to by the court and the sheriff calls for 
          such measures.  This bill does not address where such additional 
          funds would come from, but since the additional exterior 
          security services are not mandated, no additional funding is 
          needed at this time. 

          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 








                                                                 AB 2473
                                                                  Page  5

           
          San Bernardino County, Office of the Sheriff

           Opposition 
           
          None on file

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334