BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2491
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 2491 (Blumenfield)
As Amended March 29, 2012
Majority vote
EDUCATION 6-4 APPROPRIATIONS 12-4
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Brownley, Ammiano, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield, |
| |Butler, Carter, Eng, | |Bradford, Charles |
| |Williams | |Calderon, Campos, Davis, |
| | | |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara, |
| | | |Mitchell, Solorio |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Norby, Grove, Halderman, |Nays:|Donnelly, Nielsen, Norby, |
| |Wagner | |Wagner |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Prohibits a school district's application for a
proposed Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) program to be
approved by the State Board of Education (SBE), for a period of
more than one year unless the application describes the process
used by the school district to identify for eligibility in the
program, pupils of ethnic minorities and pupils of diverse
socio-economic status.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, General Fund/Proposition 98 (GF/98) cost pressure,
likely less than $100,000, to local education agencies (LEAs) to
implement the requirements of this measure. According to the
California Department of Education (CDE), no LEA with fewer than
1,500 average daily attendance receives less to support its GATE
program than $2,500 or the amount it received in the 1998-99
fiscal year (FY), whichever is greater. The February 2009
budget package established fiscal and policy flexibility for
this program, which allows LEAs to use GATE funding for any
educational purpose it deems necessary. Also, LEAs are annually
allocated the same amount of program funding they received in
the 2008-09 FY.
COMMENTS : Background on GATE: According to the CDE, the GATE
program provides funding for LEAs to develop unique education
opportunities for high-achieving and underachieving pupils in
AB 2491
Page 2
California public elementary and secondary schools who have been
identified as gifted and talented. Special efforts are made to
ensure that pupils from economically disadvantaged and varying
cultural backgrounds are provided with full participation in
these unique opportunities. LEAs may establish programs for
GATE pupils consisting of special day classes, part-time
groupings, and cluster groupings. GATE programs are operated in
approximately 800 school districts located in all 58 counties.
There are over 480,000 public school students that have been
identified as gifted and talented in the state.
According to the author, it is crucial that we provide an
appropriate education for gifted children living in
disadvantaged situations. While many parents can afford to
provide extracurricular enrichment for their gifted children,
low-income parents lack the resources to provide these
opportunities. If schools also lack the funds necessary to
identify and appropriately educate our gifted low-income youth,
the gifts and talents of these children may never be realized.
The reasons are varied for the under-identification of gifted
and talented students who are poor or do not speak English.
Parents may be so stretched financially that opportunities for
enrichment and development are almost non-existent, and school
staff may base their judgments in part on the benefits of such
enrichment. The focus on English language acquisition may
obscure the recognition of high intelligence or talent.
Cultural differences or poverty may preclude some parents from
active involvement in the schools and from helping their
children access appropriate programs. The Los Angeles Unified
School District (LAUSD) has a large concentration of low-income
and minority students and the GATE program is notoriously
homogenous and concentrated in the higher-income student
population, for various reasons including access and cultural
differences. The goal of this bill is to encourage better
integration of those students who are not in the GATE program
but would otherwise qualify.
Demographics in GATE: Below is a chart that illustrates the
demographic differences between the general student population
in California and the student population identified for GATE.
The chart shows an over-identification of White, Asian and
Filipino students and an under-identification of Hispanic and
African American students in the GATE program state-wide.
AB 2491
Page 3
-------------------------------------------------
| |GATE Student | Statewide |
| | Population | Student |
| | | Population |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|Hispanic or Latino | 30.6% | 51.4% |
| | | |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|White | 40.0% | 26.6% |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|Asian | 17.8% | 8.5% |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|Filipino | 4.3% | 2.6% |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|African American | 4.0% | 6.7% |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|American Indian or | 0.6% | 0.7% |
|Alaska Native | | |
|-------------------+-------------+---------------|
|Pacific Islander | 0.6% |0.6% |
| | | |
-------------------------------------------------
(Source: California Department of Education 2010-11 Data)
Funding Flexibility: There are approximately 60 categorical
programs that serve specific goals or specific programs. The FY
2009-10 budget had an important impact on categorical programs.
The budget agreement imposed a 20% reduction on 39 programs and
gave local education agencies (LEAs) that received those funds
in FY 2007-08 the flexibility to use the funds for any
educational purposes from FY 2008-09 through FY 2012-13. This
flexibility was extended to FY 2014-15 by SB 70 (Budget
Committee), Chapter 7, Statutes of 2011. This reduction and
flexibility provision is commonly known as "Tier 3" flexibility,
which essentially gives LEAs $4.5 billion in additional
unrestricted funds. Tier 1 protected four categorical programs
from cuts and flexibility while 11 categorical programs
sustained reductions but were given no flexibility under Tier 2.
For Tier 3 funds, school districts receive their allocations
for five years based on the applicable percentage the programs
received in FY 2007-08. As a result, until 2015, LEAs are not
required to justify or report average daily attendance (ADA) in
order to receive the specified categorical funds. GATE is one
of the categorical programs included in Tier 3 flexibility,
AB 2491
Page 4
therefore, districts are not required to submit an application
to the CDE for approval. This means this bill would not be
implemented until Tier 3 flexibility expires in 2014-15, or
later if it is extended again.
Analysis Prepared by : Chelsea Kelley / ED. / (916) 319-2087
FN: 0003416