BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2491|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2491
          Author:   Blumenfield (D)
          Amended:  8/6/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  6-2, 6/27/12
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Alquist, Liu, Price, Simitian, Vargas
          NOES:  Blakeslee, Huff
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Hancock, Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/6/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Dutton

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  46-26, 5/3/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Pupil instruction:  gifted and talented pupil 
          program:  
                      standard for pupil identification 

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the State Board of Education 
          (SBE), upon the next revision of specified criteria, to 
          adopt a standard for pupil identification to ensure the 
          identification procedures of an applicant school district 
          provide economically disadvantaged pupils and pupils of 
          varying cultural backgrounds with full participation in 
          Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) programs.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2491
                                                                Page 
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the GATE program to 
          support unique opportunities for pupils who are identified 
          as gifted and talented and expresses the intent of the 
          Legislature that special efforts be made to ensure that 
          pupils from economically disadvantaged and varying cultural 
          backgrounds be provided with full participation in program. 


          Existing law requires the SBE to maintain regulations 
          governing the GATE program and requires the Superintendent 
          of Public Instruction (SPI) to apportion funds to school 
          districts that offer GATE programs approved by the SBE. 

          School districts that choose to offer a GATE program must 
          submit for approval by the SBE, an application in the "form 
          and manner" prescribed by the SPI.  Existing law requires 
          applications to be approved or denied based on the quality 
          of the plan in accordance with criteria adopted by the SBE 
          and requires the SBE to review the criteria at least once 
          every four years.  The SBE revised the current criteria, 
          Recommended Standards for Programs for Gifted and Talented 
          Students, in 2005.  Generally speaking, applications are 
          approved for one, two, or three years.  The SBE is 
          authorized to approve applications for a period of five 
          years if the program meets exemplary standards.  

          Existing law specifies that for the 2008-09 fiscal year 
          through the 2014-15 fiscal year, local educational agencies 
          that receive funds for specified categorical programs may 
          use the funding received during that time for any 
          educational purpose to the extent permitted by federal law. 
           Funding for GATE programs is included in this categorical 
          flexibility.  

          This bill requires the SBE, upon the next revision of 
          specified criteria, to adopt a standard for pupil 
          identification to ensure the identification procedures of 
          an applicant school district provide economically 
          disadvantaged pupils and pupils of varying cultural 
          backgrounds with full participation in GATE programs.

           Comments
           
           Gifted and Talented Education  .  GATE programs provide 







                                                               AB 2491
                                                                Page 
          3

          differentiated curriculum for gifted and talented students, 
          defined as those who have been identified as possessing 
          demonstrated or potential abilities that give evidence of 
          high performance capability.  These abilities are defined 
          by each school district in accordance with regulations 
          established by the SBE.  Current law requires each district 
          to use one or more of the following categories in defining 
          the capability:  intellectual, creative, specific academic 
          or leadership ability, high achievement, performing and 
          visual arts talent, or other criterion that meets standards 
          set by the SBE.  In 2008-09, the most recent year for which 
          enrollment data are available, there were approximately 
          533,000 GATE students in California.  

          School districts have the responsibility for the 
          development of a method for the identification of pupils as 
          gifted and talented.  The method of identification must be 
          included in the district's application to operate a GATE 
          program.  The application must demonstrate that the 
          district's identification procedures are equitable, 
          comprehensive, and ongoing.  Applications must address the 
          nomination/referral process used in the program, describe 
          the assessment/identification process to ensure that 
          potentially gifted students are appropriately assessed for 
          identification as gifted students, and describe service 
          options available within the program and between other 
          educational programs.  Applicants must also demonstrate 
          that placement is based on the assessed needs of the 
          student and is periodically reviewed.  

           GATE demographics  .  According to the Mid-Atlantic Equity 
          Center at George Washington University,  the 
          disproportional representation of culturally, 
          linguistically, and ethnically diverse and low-income 
          students in gifted and talented programs has been a 
          persistent issue for many decades, with the percentage of 
          minority students constituting gifted and talented below 
          their percentage make up of total enrollment.  California 
          enrollment data for 2008 appears to support this finding.  
          For example, Hispanic or Latino students constituted about 
          49% of the total pupil population in 2008, but represented 
          only 31% of GATE statewide enrollment.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   







                                                               AB 2491
                                                                Page 
          4

          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, minor 
          workload increase for the SBE to adopt a new standard.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/6/12)

          American Federation of State, County and Municipal 
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          California Association for the Gifted
          Los Angeles County Office of Education


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, it is 
          crucial that gifted children living in disadvantaged 
          situations receive an appropriate education.  While many 
          parents can afford to provide extracurricular enrichment 
          for their gifted children, low-income parents often lack 
          the resources to provide these opportunities.  The author 
          maintains that there is under-identification of gifted and 
          talented students who are poor or don't speak English and 
          notes that the focus on English language acquisition may 
          obscure the recognition of high intelligence or talent.  
          Further, cultural differences or poverty may make it 
          difficult for some parents to be actively involved in the 
          schools and help their children access appropriate 
          programs.  Research shows that when gifted students are not 
          sufficiently challenged, their achievement levels drop and 
          they can be at risk for becoming an underachiever.  The 
          goal of this bill is to improve underrepresented students' 
          access to GATE programs.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  46-26, 5/3/12
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, 
            Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Davis, 
            Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Galgiani, Gatto, 
            Hayashi, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie 
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. 
            Manuel P�rez, Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Beth Gaines, Garrick, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, 







                                                               AB 2491
                                                                Page 
          5

            Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, 
            Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Valadao, 
            Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bonilla, Chesbro, Fletcher, Furutani, 
            Gordon, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez, Smyth


          PQ:n  8/8/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****