BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          AB 2552 (Torres) - Vehicles: provisions on driving under the 
          influence.
          
          Amended: August 6, 2012         Policy Vote: Public Safety 7-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 16, 2012                          
          Consultant: Jolie Onodera       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 2552 would revise and recast the provisions on 
          driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or a 
          combination of alcohol and drugs, by separating the provisions 
          into distinct sections.

          Fiscal Impact: 
           One-time costs of approximately $1.2 million (Motor Vehicle 
            Account) to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for 
            programming changes.
           Potential federal grant funding of $400,000 to $500,000 
            through the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) pending a written 
            grant agreement between the OTS and DMV, and subject to BTH 
            approval, to support the project.

          Background: Existing law provides that it is unlawful for any 
          person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or 
          drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage 
          and drug, to drive a vehicle. 

          Under existing law, the provisions related to driving under the 
          influence of alcohol or drugs, or the combination of drugs and 
          alcohol, are listed together in sections of statute and are not 
          separately distinguishable between individuals arrested for 
          driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination 
          of both. As a result, limited data is available to accurately 
          identify the number of arrests due to each specific type of 
          violation. 

          According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
          (NHTSA), "In particular, a lack of statewide arrest or 
          disposition data distinguishing drug-impaired from 
          alcohol-impaired driving arrests significantly impedes the 
          States' ability to assess the extent of drug-impaired driving 






          AB 2552 (Torres)
          Page 1


          and evaluate the impact of countermeasures. Similarly, the lack 
          of standardized and complete State record systems limits the 
          NHTSA's ability to make clear inferences about the scope of the 
          national drug-impaired-driving problem." "Only two states 
          (Hawaii and New York) have driving under the influence of drugs 
          statutes separate from their alcohol DUI laws. In all other 
          States, a driver violates a DUI statute if the driver drives 
          under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of 
          alcohol and drugs." (Drug Impaired Driving: Understanding the 
          Problem and Ways to Reduce It, A Report to Congress, NHTSA, 
          December 2009)

          Proposed Law: This bill would revise and recast provisions 
          related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or 
          the combination of drugs and alcohol by separating the 
          provisions into the following three distinct sections:
                  Driving under the influence of alcohol.
                  Driving under the influence of drugs.
                  Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

          Staff Comments: The DMV has indicated the provisions of this 
          bill will necessitate extensive programming changes that 
          realistically could not be completed by the January 1, 2013, 
          implementation date of this bill. In addition to significant 
          overtime costs to expedite the extensive programming workload, 
          the DMV would also incur additional costs to manually process 
          DUI abstracts and impose suspension actions until the automation 
          changes are completed. Estimated costs would likely be in the 
          range of $2.4 million (Motor Vehicle Account) in an effort to 
          meet the requirements of the bill under the tight timeframe. A 
          number of pending programming efforts and a critical DMV 
          information technology project could also be compromised in 
          efforts to meet the timelines of this bill, potentially 
          resulting in additional future costs to the department.

          The DMV has indicated a delayed operative date of 12 months will 
          reduce the estimated programming costs to $1.2 million, and will 
          help to alleviate the need for overtime and additional workload 
          for manual processes. Moreover, the delayed operative date will 
          not disrupt DMV's other critical programming efforts currently 
          underway. 

          Staff notes the OTS has indicated the NHTSA has approved a 
          funding request for $400,000 to $500,000 in unexpended federal 
          grant funds (Section 408 - State Traffic Safety Information 
          Systems Improvements) pending a written grant agreement between 






          AB 2552 (Torres)
          Page 2


          the OTS and the DMV to ensure costs are reasonable and 
          allowable. Approval from the Business, Transportation, and 
          Housing Agency would also be required. These federal grant funds 
          would assist the DMV with a portion of the programming costs.

          To the extent the improved tracking of DUI offenses leads to 
          better data and more comprehensive information, could result in 
          assisting researchers to quantify the magnitude of drug-impaired 
          driving, and could enhance traffic safety by allowing for 
          appropriate sentencing, probation, and rehabilitation upon 
          conviction, for either alcohol or drug impairment.
          
          Recommended Amendments: In order to substantially reduce the 
          fiscal impact of this measure, staff recommends an amendment to 
          delay the operative date by 12 months to January 1, 2014. This 
          will also provide the DMV with additional time to ensure proper 
          planning and staff are available to complete this project.
           
          Proposed Author Amendments: The proposed author amendments delay 
          implementation to January 1, 2014.