BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �





           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |         SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER         |
          |                   Senator Fran Pavley, Chair                    |
          |                    2011-2012 Regular Session                    |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          BILL NO: AB 2609                   HEARING DATE: June 26, 2012
          AUTHOR: Hueso                      URGENCY: No
          VERSION: April 24, 2012            CONSULTANT: Dennis O'Connor
          DUAL REFERRAL: No                  FISCAL: Yes
          SUBJECT: Fish and Game Commission.
          
          BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW

          Article IV, Section 20 of the California Constitution creates 
          the Fish and Game Commission: 5 members appointed by the 
          Governor and approved by the Senate for 6-year terms and until 
          their successors are appointed and qualified. A member of the 
          commission may be removed by concurrent resolution adopted by 
          each house, a majority of the membership concurring.

          The Fish and Game Code requires commissioners to elect one of 
          their members as president, and one as vice president.  The code 
          also requires the commission to adopt a conflict of interest 
          code pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

          The commission has had a longstanding regulation that required 
          the president and vice president be selected based solely on 
          seniority.  That regulation was repealed effective June 1, 2012.

          PROPOSED LAW
          This bill would:

          1.Make legislative findings encouraging the Governor and the 
            Senate Committee on Rules to consider the following minimum 
            qualifications in selecting, appointing, and confirming 
            commissioners to serve on the commission:
                 The degree to which the appointee will enhance the 
               diversity of background and geographic representation of 
               the commission.
                 The appointee's demonstrated interest and background in, 
               and familiarity with, wildlife and natural resources 
               management programs at the state or federal level.
                                                                      1







                 The appointee's previous experience in public policy 
               decision-making, including government processes involving 
               public participation.
                 The appointee's commitment to prepare for and attend 
               meetings and subcommittee meetings of the commission and to 
               comply with all applicable state conflict-of-interest laws.
                 The extent of the appointee's exposure to and experience 
               with the basic science underpinning the management of 
               living natural resources.
                 The appointee's diversity of knowledge of natural 
               resource issues and related scientific disciplines, 
               including, but not limited to, outdoor recreation.

          1.Add additional provisions regarding the election of the 
            president and vice president, including:
                 The election shall be held annually, by a concurrent 
               vote of at least three commissioners. 
                 No president or vice president shall serve more than two 
               consecutive years.
                 The president or vice president may be removed from the 
               position of president or vice president by a vote, at any 
               time, of at least three commissioners.

          1.Require the commission to adopt a code of conduct that 
            requires, at a minimum, that a commissioner:
                 Faithfully discharge the duties, responsibilities, and 
               quasi-judicial actions of the commission.
                 Conduct his or her affairs in the public's best 
               interest, following principles of fundamental fairness and 
               due process of law.
                 Conduct his or her affairs in an open, objective, and 
               impartial manner, free of undue influence and the abuse of 
               power and authority.
                 Understand that California's wildlife and natural 
               resources programs require public awareness, understanding, 
               and support of, and participation and confidence in, the 
               commission and its practices and procedures.
                 Preserve the public's welfare and the integrity of the 
               commission, and act to maintain the public's trust in the 
               commission and the implementation of its regulations and 
               policies.
                 Not conduct himself or herself in a manner that reflects 
               discredit upon state laws or policies, regulations, and 
               principles of the commission.
                 Not make, participate in making, or in any other way 
               attempt to use his or her official position to influence a 
               commission decision in which the member has a financial 
                                                                      2







               interest.

          1.Move the requirement for the adoption of a conflict of 
            interest policy out of the Fish and Game Code and into the 
            Political Reform Act of 1974.

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
          According to the author, "As the Commission's scope and 
          responsibilities have significantly expanded over the past 142 
          years and as scientific knowledge of the habitat conservation 
          and ecosystem-based management needs of wildlife have grown, 
          Commissioners are increasingly expected to make complex public 
          policy and biological decisions.  It is necessary to meet 
          minimum qualifications for the selection and appointment of 
          members of the Commission and hold members to a higher ethical 
          standard, similar to other California boards and commissions."

          The Humane Society further comments, "Recent events have put the 
          FGC appointment, political reporting and business processes on 
          the Legislature's radar. Over the years, many stakeholders who 
          have engaged with the FGC have raised related concerns and 
          suffered a lack of trust with respect to FGC decisions. AB 2609 
          addresses a variety of those concerns and, if enacted, would 
          give the public additional assurances about FGC's 
          accountability, competency, and transparency."

          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: None Received

          COMMENTS 
           Standards and Qualifications  .  It is not unusual for the 
          legislature to require minimum qualifications and standards of 
          behavior for members of various boards, bureaus, and 
          commissions.  Members of some boards, like the State Water 
          Resources Control Board, must have specific professional 
          qualifications in order to serve.  Others, such as the Ocean 
          Protection Council, have a mix of ex officio positions and 
          public member positions, where the public members are to have 
          specific backgrounds and interests.  This bill treats the Fish 
          and Game commissioners as if they are all public members, 
          needing some mix of experiences and interests.

          Requirement for conduct are also not uncommon.  For example, the 
          Public Resources Code requires members of the California Coastal 
          Commission to act in the public interest and to abide by 
          principles of fundamental fairness and due process of law.

           Are These The Right Ones?   Typically, minimum qualifications are 
                                                                      3







          few and rather broad.  For example, the precise requirements for 
          appointing public members of the Coastal Commission are: "In 
          making their appointments pursuant to this division, the 
          Governor, the Senate Committee on Rules, and the Speaker of the 
          Assembly shall make good faith efforts to assure that their 
          appointments, as a whole, reflect, to the greatest extent 
          feasible, the economic, social, and geographic diversity of the 
          state."  This bill proposes a fairly extensive but still 
          somewhat broad list of desirable characteristics.

          Statutory requirements for behavior are generally of three 
          types.  Some are extraordinary broad, such as ensuring the 
          decision is in the "public interest."  Others are fairly 
          detailed, and focused on issues such as ex parte communication 
          and other forms of process fairness.  This bill takes the third 
          path, typical of occupational licensing programs, requiring the 
          development of regulations governing professional behavior.  
          Even still, most statutory requirements simply call for the 
          developing of regulations relating to professional conduct and 
          ethical behavior.  This bill goes further and details the types 
          of issues the regulations should address.

           The Puma In The Room.   In mid-February, there were numerous news 
          stories showing the President of the Fish and Game Commission 
          holding a dead mountain lion he killed in recent hunting trip in 
          Idaho.  While hunting mountain lions is legal in Idaho, it is 
          not in California.  Many environmental and animal welfare groups 
          expressed outrage, while a number of hunting organizations 
          defended the president's actions.

           Related Bills.  AB 41 (Hill) amends the same section of the 
          Political Reform Act of 1974 as this bill.  Should AB 41 and 
          this both continue moving through the legislative process, 
          chaptering amendments would likely be necessary.

          SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS: None

          SUPPORT
          Fair Political Practices Commission
          The Humane Society
          Endangered Habitats League
          PawPac

          OPPOSITION
          None Received


                                                                      4






















































                                                                      5