BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2616
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2616 (Carter)
          As Amended  May 9, 2012
          Majority vote 

           EDUCATION           10-0        APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Brownley, Norby, Ammiano, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |
          |     |Buchanan, Carter, Eng,    |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
          |     |Grove, Halderman, Wagner, |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
          |     |Williams                  |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |
          |     |                          |     |Ammiano, Hill, Lara,      |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Makes several changes to the provisions governing 
          truancy.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Specifies that for purposes of the truancy provisions, a valid 
            excuse includes, but is not limited to, the reasons for which 
            a pupil shall be excused from school, and may include other 
            reasons that are within the discretion of school 
            administrators and, based on the facts of the pupil's 
            circumstances, are deemed to constitute a valid excuse.  

          2)Revises the provision governing the first time a truancy 
            report is issued.  Specifies that the pupil and, as 
            appropriate, the parent, may be requested to attend a meeting 
            with a school counselor or other school designee to discuss 
            the root causes of the attendance issue and develop a joint 
            plan to improve the pupil's attendance.  Strikes the provision 
            that a pupil may be given a written warning by a peace officer 
            the first time a truancy report is issued.  

          3)Revises the provision governing the second time a truancy 
            report is issued.  Provides that in addition to being assigned 
            by the school to an afterschool or weekend study program, the 
            pupil may be given a written warning by a peace officer.  A 
            record of the written warning may be kept at the school for a 
            period of not less than two years, or until the pupil 
            graduates, or transfers, from that school.  If the pupil 








                                                                  AB 2616
                                                                  Page  2


            transfers from that school, the record may be forwarded to the 
            school receiving the pupil's school records.  A record of the 
            written warning may be maintained by the law enforcement 
            agency in accordance with that law enforcement agency's 
            policies and procedures. 

          4)Authorizes, rather than requires, that upon a fourth time a 
            truancy is issued within the same school year, the pupil to be 
            referred to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court that may 
            adjudge the pupil to be a ward of the court.  

          5)Lowers a fine associated with a fourth truancy, if the pupil 
            is adjudged a ward of the court, from $100 dollars to $50 
            dollars, for which a parent or legal guardian of the pupil may 
            be jointly liable.  Specifies that the fine shall not be 
            subject to state penalties specified under Penal Code Section 
            1464.  

          6)Adds "legal" before all references to "guardian."  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, General Fund/Proposition 98 pressure, likely less 
          than $1 million, to school districts to comply with the 
          parent/guardian's request to attend a meeting with a counselor, 
          upon receipt of the first truancy report.  Potential, 
          indeterminate unknown General Fund savings, likely in the tens 
          of thousands, to the court system to repeal the mandate that a 
          pupil be under the jurisdiction of a juvenile court upon his or 
          her fourth truancy report within the same school year.   

           COMMENTS  :  California's compulsory education law requires all 
          students between the ages of six and 18 to attend school 
          full-time and requires their parents and legal guardians to be 
          responsible for ensuring that their children attend school.  
          This bill makes several changes to the truancy laws.  In 
          2010-11, the California Department of Education (CDE) reported a 
          truancy rate of 29.76%; 1.837 million students out of a total 
          enrollment of 6.2 million were considered truants.  

          A student who is absent from school without a valid excuse three 
          full days in one school year or is tardy or absent for more than 
          any 30-minute period during the schoolday without a valid excuse 
          on three occasions in one school year, or any combination 
          thereof, is considered a truant.  This bill clarifies that a 








                                                                  AB 2616
                                                                  Page  3


          "valid excuse" includes, but is not limited to, the excused 
          absences authorized in existing law (e.g., illness, doctor and 
          dental appointments of the pupil or the pupil's child, attending 
          funeral services of a member of his or her immediate family), 
          and may include other reasons within the discretion of school 
          administrators.  The sponsor of the bill, Public Counsel, states 
          that administrators should have more discretion to take into 
          consideration circumstances that may have caused a pupil to be 
          absent or late - for example, a pupil takes public 
          transportation to school and the bus is late.  

          Parents or legal guardians are notified when their children has 
          been classified as a truant and are provided specified 
          information, including a reminder of their obligation to compel 
          the attendance of pupils at school, that parents or legal 
          guardians who fail to meet this obligation may be guilty of an 
          infraction and subject to prosecution, that alternative 
          educational programs are available, and that the parent or the 
          legal guardian has the right to meet with appropriate school 
          personnel to discuss solutions to the pupil's truancy.  

          Existing law specifies actions that may or shall be undertaken 
          each time a truancy report is required.  Existing law authorizes 
          a pupil to receive a written warning by a peace officer upon a 
          first truancy report.  The record of the warning is kept for two 
          years and may be transferred to a new school if the pupil 
          changes school.  This bill authorizes, instead, the pupil and 
          the parent to meet with the school counselor or other school 
          staff to discuss the root causes of the attendance issue and 
          develop a joint plan to improve attendance upon a first truancy 
          report.  The truancy laws were devised as a way to keep students 
          in school.  This provision of the bill is consistent with the 
          goal of a series of bills that have been introduced this year 
          attempting to reduce punitive disciplinary measures and focus 
          instead on alternative ways to keep a student in school.  Under 
          this bill, the written warning by a peace officer current 
          authorized for a first truancy report is an authorized 
          consequence upon a second truancy report.  

          Upon a pupil's third truancy in a school year, a pupil is 
          classified as a habitual truant and may be referred to a school 
          attendance review board (SARB) or to the local probation 
          officer.  A fourth truancy puts the pupil within the 
          jurisdiction of the juvenile court and may deem the pupil a ward 








                                                                  AB 2616
                                                                  Page  4


          of the court.  If the pupil is adjudged a ward of the court, the 
          pupil may be required to do court-approved community service, 
          attend a court-approved truancy prevention program, have his or 
          her driving privileges suspended or revoked, and/or pay a fine 
          of $100.  This bill makes it permissive to refer the pupil to 
          the juvenile court, reduces the fine to $50, and prohibits the 
          fine to be subjected to additional state penalties for all 
          criminal offenses specified in Penal Code Section 1464.  

          According to the sponsor, "there are situations where a school 
          could find that sending the child into the juvenile justice 
          system would not be of benefit to the child, particularly given 
          the research showing that children with juvenile court 
          involvement are as much as 4 times more likely to drop out of 
          schools.  In fact, juvenile court involvement could further 
          exacerbate the attendance issues, particularly given the time 
          required for the young person and his or her family to go to 
          Court and the lack of resources that the Courts often have to 
          assist with any underlying problems related mental health, 
          special education, disability, and poverty.  Generally, as the 
          American Psychological Association and others have found, rather 
          than serving as a "wake-up call," aggressive criminal justice 
          centered policies in and around schools are more likely to cause 
          students to feel alienated from the educational system, causing 
          further disengagement.  Moreover, if the Court determines that 
          incarceration is the appropriate response, our juvenile court 
          schools, according to at least one measure from CDE's DATAQUEST, 
          have a four year adjusted derived dropout rate of 98.7%, which 
          is obviously contrary to the intended goal of increasing 
          attendance and moving students closer to school success."


           ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |               |        Existing law         |         AB 2616          |
          |               |                             |                          |
          |---------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------|
          |First truancy  |The pupil may be given a     |The pupil, and, as        |
          |report         |written warning by a peace   |appropriate, the parent   |
          |               |officer.                     |or legal guardian may be  |
          |               |                             |requested to attend a     |
          |               |                             |meeting with a school     |
          |               |                             |staff to discuss the root |
          |               |                             |causes of the attendance  |
          |               |                             |issue and develop a joint |








                                                                  AB 2616
                                                                  Page  5


          |               |                             |plan to improve the       |
          |               |                             |pupil's attendance.       |
          |---------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------|
          |Second truancy |The pupil may be assigned to |The pupil may be given a  |
          |report         |an afterschool or weekend    |written warning by a      |
          |               |study program.               |peace officer, and may be |
          |               |                             |assigned to an            |
          |               |                             |afterschool or weekend    |
          |               |                             |study program.            |
          |---------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------|
          |Third truancy  |The pupil shall be           |No change.                |
          |report         |classified as a habitual     |                          |
          |               |truant and may be referred   |                          |
          |               |to a SARB or a truancy       |                          |
          |               |mediation program.           |                          |
          |---------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------|
          |Fourth truancy |Requires the pupil to be     |Makes it permissive to    |
          |report         |referred to the juvenile     |refer a pupil to juvenile |
          |               |court which may adjudge the  |court.  Reduces the fine  |
          |               |pupil to be a ward of the    |to $50 and prohibits the  |
          |               |court.  The pupil shall be   |fine to be subjected to   |
          |               |required to do one or more   |state penalties.          |
          |               |of the following:  community |                          |
          |               |service, attend a            |                          |
          |               |court-approved truancy       |                          |
          |               |prevention program, have his |                          |
          |               |or her driving privileges    |                          |
          |               |suspended or revoked, and/or |                          |
          |               |pay a fine of not more than  |                          |
          |               |$100.                        |                          |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Sophia Kwong Kim / ED. / (916) 319-2087 

                                                                FN: 0003891