BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          AB 2649 (Ammiano) - Tidelands and submerged lands: City and 
          County of San Francisco: seawall lots.
          
          Amended: May 2, 2012            Policy Vote: NR&W 9-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 6, 2012                      Consultant: 
          Bob Franzoia  
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 2649 would declare that, upon the State Lands 
          Commission making certain findings, seawall lot 322-1 is free 
          from public trust use requirements and would authorize the Port 
          of San Francisco to lease the lot for a nontrust use. 

          Fiscal Impact: Major General Fund loss to the state of a public 
          trust resource through 2094.
              There is no fair market value appraisal of seawall lot 
              322-1.

          Background: For over 100 years, the Legislature has granted 
          public trust lands to local governments so the lands can be 
          managed locally for the benefit of the people of California.  
          There are over 80 trustees in the state, including the ports of 
          Los Angeles, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, 
          Richmond, Benicia, and Eureka.  While these trust lands are 
          managed locally, the commission has oversight authority to 
          ensure those local trustees are complying with the public trust 
          doctrine and the applicable granting statutes.

          Existing law protects, pursuant to the common law doctrine of 
          the public trust, the public's right to use California's 
          waterways for commerce, navigation, fishing, boating, natural 
          habitat protection, and other water oriented activities.  The 
          public trust doctrine provides that filled and unfilled tide and 
          submerged lands and the beds of lakes, streams, and other 
          navigable waterways (public trust lands) are to be held in trust 
          by the state for the benefit of the people of California.  

          Existing law requires the commission to be the steward and 
          manager of the state's public trust lands.  The commission has 








          AB 2649 (Ammiano)
          Page 1


          direct administrative control over the state's public trust 
          lands and oversight authority over public trust lands granted by 
          the Legislature to local public agencies (granted lands).

          Existing law grants in trust to the port, pursuant to the Burton 
          Act (Chapter 1333/1968), administrative control over the public 
          trust lands in the harbor of San Francisco for purposes of 
          commerce, navigation, and fisheries and subject to other terms 
          and conditions specified in the act.

          Seawall lots are filled tidelands.

          The port is governed by a five member Board of Commissioners, 
          each of whom is appointed by the Mayor and subject to 
          confirmation by the City's Board of Supervisors. Each 
          commissioner is appointed to a four-year term. The port 
          commission is responsible for the seven and one-half miles of 
          waterfront adjacent to San Francisco Bay, which the port 
          develops, markets, leases, administers, manages, and maintains. 
          Its jurisdiction stretches along the waterfront from Hyde Street 
          Pier on the north to India Basin on the south. The port's 
          operating portfolio is composed of over 550 ground, commercial, 
          retail, office, industrial and maritime industrial leases.

          Pier 70 is a port site that is approximately 67 acres located in 
          San Francisco's central waterfront, sitting at the foot of 
          Potrero Hill and generally located between Mariposa and 22nd 
          Street, east of Illinois Street.  This site has been identified 
          as a future National Historic District due to its over 150 years 
          of continuous operations in ship building and repair and the 
          role it played in the industrialization of the western United 
          States, the war efforts, and architectural and engineering 
          feats.  Despite its desirable climate and historical features, 
          Pier 70 is in need of major rehabilitation as a result of 
          dilapidated and unsafe structures as well as contamination that 
          occurred during its long history of industrial use.

          Pier 70 is generally made up of public trust lands.  As part of 
          its Pier 70 master plan, the port would like to develop 
          non-trust uses in areas that it believes are least suitable for 
          public trust uses.  The contemplated non-trust development 
          includes cultural, institutional, office, biotech, other 
          commercial, and perhaps a limited amount of residential uses.









          AB 2649 (Ammiano)
          Page 2


          Seawall lot 322-1, which is located in the Pier 70 area, is 
          subject to public trust and Burton Act use restrictions.  The 
          port would like the Legislature to find that the parcel is no 
          longer useful for trust purposes and lift the trust to allow for 
          the development of affordable housing, which is not a trust 
          consistent use.  

          Proposed Law: This bill authorizes the port, notwithstanding the 
          fair market value requirements in SB 815 (Migden) Chapter 
          660/2007, to provide a rent credit or other waiver or deferral 
          of rent in connection with either a nontrust lease of seawall 
          lot 322-1, or, with the approval of the commission, a lease of 
          any other designated seawall lot or other port property that is 
          not subject to public trust or Burton Act trust use 
          restrictions, that results in an effective rent to the port 
          below fair market value, if the commission finds that both of 
          the following conditions are met:  

          (1) The nontrust lease is for affordable housing. The lease may 
          allow other uses, including, but not limited to, commercial uses 
          and market rate housing, provided that no portion of the rent 
          credit, waiver, or deferral is applied to the rent for those 
          other uses.

          (2) The port is entitled to apply the value of the rent credit, 
          waiver, or deferral as an offset against fees or other exactions 
          or obligations that would otherwise be levied or imposed by the 
          city on development projects located on Pier 70, or on other 
          lands under the port's jurisdiction, if approved by the 
          commission, relating to the projects' impacts on or demand for 
          affordable housing, including, but not limited to, fees imposed 
          pursuant to the city's jobs-housing linkage program.  

          Related Legislation: SB 815 (Migden), Chapter 660/2007 contained 
          findings and declarations that several seawall lots (identified 
          as seawall lots 328, 330, 337, and 347S, including a portion of 
          Mission Rock Street) have ceased to be useful for the promotion 
          of the public trust and the Burton Act trust and are freed from 
          the use requirements of the public trust and the Burton Act 
          until January 1, 2094.

          Staff Comments: The "temporary" lifting (for a period of 81 
          years) of public trust use restrictions from a parcel of public 
          land through legislation will likely prompt a future act to 








          AB 2649 (Ammiano)
          Page 3


          permanently lift the trust from the parcel.  Given the 
          significance of eliminating lands from the public's use, the 
          Legislature should ensure that the state conducts its due 
          diligence in reviewing the facts and laws to ensure terminating 
          the trust is appropriate and in the best interest of the state.

          Chapter 660/2007 provides an example for this concern.  Chapter 
          660 authorized the temporary lifting of the public trust use 
          restrictions from certain filled tidelands scattered along the 
          San Francisco's waterfront.  Seawall lot 330 was one of these 
          parcels of filled tidelands.  It is a two acre lot located on 
          The Embarcadero between the Ferry Building and AT&T Park with 
          unobstructed views of San Francisco Bay.  The justification for 
          temporarily lifting the trust use restrictions from these filled 
          tidelands was that (1) the lands were not being used for trust 
          purposes, (2) significant revenues can be generated from these 
          lands if they are utilized for nontrust purposes, (3) the 
          revenues generated from these lands will go to improve other 
          public trust lands, such as the city's historical piers, and (4) 
          the trust use restrictions will only be lifted temporarily.  No 
          major objection was raised to this bill due in large part to the 
          "temporary" nature of the act.

          On December 14, 2010, three years after the enactment of Chapter 
          660, the city entered into the 34th America's Cup Host and Venue 
          Agreement with the America's Cup Event Authority and San 
          Francisco America's Cup Organizing Committee.  In this 
          agreement, the city agreed to a term that "unconditionally 
          obligated" it to remove in its entirety the common law public 
          trust and Burton Act trust from Seawall Lot 330 for conveyance 
          to a private party.  The city did not have the authority to 
          unconditionally obligate itself to this action.

          AB 418 (Ammiano) Chapter 477/2011 permanently terminated the 
          public trust from Seawall Lot 330.  That bill relied heavily on 
          findings in Chapter 660/2007 to conclude that the parcel was no 
          longer useful for trust purposes.  This provided the 
          justification in the bill to exclude the parcel from public use 
          in perpetuity.  

          Realistically, once the state authorizes use of seawall lot 
          322-1 for nontrust purposes until January 1, 2094, this lot will 
          likely never again be available for public trust purposes.









          AB 2649 (Ammiano)
          Page 4


          Recommended Amendments: 
          (1) This bill is proposing to allow the use of public trust land 
          for non-trust purposes for a period of 75 years for less than 
          fair market value.  Staff recommends amending Sec 4 of this bill 
          as noted below in order to ensure commission consideration and 
          approval prior to the issuance of any such lease and to provide 
          the Legislature with greater assurance that the affordable 
          housing, the non-trust purpose, will be constructed on Seawall 
          lot 322-1 in conjunction with the development of Pier 70, thus 
          benefitting the public trust.

          SEC. 4.    (a) Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 4 of 
          Chapter 660  of the Statutes of 2007  , the port may, conditioned 
          on the approval of the commission, provide a rent credit or 
          other waiver or deferral of rent in connection with  either  a 
          nontrust lease of seawall lot 322-1  , or, with the approval of 
          the commission, a nontrust lease of any other designated seawall 
          lot or other port property that is not subject to the use 
          restrictions of the public trust or, the Burton Act trust use 
          restrictions, or the Burton Act transfer agreement, that results 
          in an effective rent to the port below fair market value,  if the 
          commission finds that both of the following conditions are met:
             (1) The nontrust lease is for affordable housing. The lease 
          may allow other uses, including, but not limited to, commercial 
          uses and market rate housing, provided that no portion of the 
          rent credit, waiver, or deferral is applied to the rent for 
          those other uses.
             (2) The port is entitled to apply the value of the rent 
          credit, waiver, or deferral as an offset against fees or other 
          exactions or obligations that would otherwise be levied or 
          imposed by the city on development projects located on Pier 70. 
           , or on other lands under the port's jurisdiction, if approved 
          by the commission in accordance with this paragraph, relating to 
          the projects' impacts on or demand for affordable housing, 
          including, but not limited to, fees imposed pursuant to the 
          city's jobs-housing linkage program. If the development project 
          benefiting from the offset is not located on Pier 70, the 
          commission shall not make an approval under this paragraph 
          unless the project is located on the designated seawall lot on 
          which the affordable housing is located, or the commission finds 
          that the development project includes investment in the 
          preservation of a historic pier or historic structure in an 
          amount equal to or greater than the amount of the offset.
             (b) The port shall provide the commission with documentation 








          AB 2649 (Ammiano)
          Page 5


          necessary to support the findings required by Section 3 of this 
          act and subdivision (a) of this section at or prior to the time 
          the port submits the proposed nontrust lease and other 
          documentation required under subdivision (c) of Section 4 of 
          Chapter 660.
             (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting 
          the port's authority to provide rent credits, waivers, or 
          deferrals under a nontrust lease in exchange for other valuable 
          consideration provided by the lessee that meets the fair market 
          value requirement of Chapter 660.
             (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting 
          the port's authority under the Burton Act to use or lease the 
          designated seawall lots for uses permitted by the Burton Act, 
          subject to any applicable limitations of state law.

          (2) To ensure that the state protects public trust lands and 
          resources, staff recommends amending this bill to allow the 
          port, as an alternative to pursuing a non-trust lease that must 
          terminate in 2094 as described in Sections 3 and 4 and with the 
          approval of the commission in consultation with the California 
          Coastal Conservancy, to acquire land of equal monetary value to 
          seawall lot 322-1 that is adjacent to the water and has 
          dedicated public trust values in exchange for permanently 
          lifting the trust use restrictions at seawall lot 322-1.  If the 
          port is unable to find available and suitable land to acquire, 
          the port shall make a deposit of equal value to seawall lot 
          322-1 to the Kapiloff Land Bank Fund pursuant to Division 
          (commencing with Section 8600) of the Public Resources Code.

          This amendment will hopefully set the precedent for any future 
          actions to temporarily or permanently lift trust use 
          restrictions from public trust lands.  This amendment will also 
          assist with avoiding a scenario where the state allows for a 
          "temporary" lifting of trust use restrictions, which in all 
          reality may lead to the permanent lifting of trust use 
          restrictions without a state review of whether such actions are 
          in the best interests of the state or securing other more 
          beneficial public trust land.