BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2657
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 9, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2657 (Calderon) - As Amended: April 10, 2012
Policy Committee:
JudiciaryVote:10-0 (Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires a transcript derived from an electronic
recording of a court proceeding to include a designation of
"inaudible" or "unintelligible" for those portions of the
recording that contain no audible sound or are not discernible.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact.
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the author, "When inaudible noises and/or
unintelligible sounds occur and are not designated within
transcripts from electronic recordings, the transcripts do not
reflect the true proceeding, potentially harming litigants by
representing inaccurate transcripts as true, correct, and
complete copies of proceedings."
"In order to ensure the integrity of the record and to alert
consumers as to any ambiguity in the record that arises from an
inaudible or unintelligible section of an audio recording - a
designation of "inaudible" or "unintelligible" should be
required in each instance it occurs in transcripts prepared from
audio recordings."
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
AB 2657
Page 2